You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: EOS - Peeking under the hood - Shady centralisation attempt with Block.one involved?
EvolutionOS looks more decentralized
was browsing on eosindex when i found it out
his page states something that got my attention:
Preventing the EOS BlockOne team and affiliated Venture Funds from operating 12 of the 21 block producers. Evolution will instead take a decentralized approach and distribute Voting Rights and Opportunity equally.
same reason that make me read your post @conceptskip
EOSlooks good, but at the end if only a small group is controlling that is not much of a decentralization, just richer getting richer IMO!
Blockchains can be build on eos, that is why evolutionOS looks good!
Also trying to delete information without saying why, concerns me a little more. hmmm....
More research is needed,
Thanks for the article
Thanks for your reply. Yes they repeat the claim of block.one controlling the 12 bp candidates on serveral occasions, but i didn't find more evidence than the 4 that i've mentioned in my post. So the rest i consider as simply unproven as of yet. Still there lacks a proper reply from block.one side.
As regards EvolutionOS as such, of course a democratic approach looks interesting, but not sure how they effectively intend to prevent sybil attacks. And the era of figures like Trump, Putin, Erdogan, and a Brexit clearly demonstrates the limitations and fallacies possible in democracy.
Thanks for the reply too :D
Is good to know that you have done your own research, i need to dig a bit and see what can i found.
Was taking a look at sybil attacks. ended up reading an article ( on letstalkbitcoin ): Solution to Sybil attacks and 51% attacks in Decentralized Networks . Proof-of-reputation was a method i did not know about :)
The proof-of-stake equal money = power, world runs that way and i do not think is doing right imo, too much greed :)
Whitepaper are like constitutions... (?). i need to take a look at the EvolutionOS paper(s) :)