Change Of Default Arbitration Forum Named in Article IX Of EOS Constitution
Earlier today, Thomas Cox from Block.one notified the community of a change that needed to be made to Article IX of the EOS Constitution The change names a different default arbitration forum. In fact, it is the same forum that was named for over a month, until the recent changes were made by Dan Larimer and Thomas Cox.
They didn’t realize the ramifications that this change could have for the EOS platform, so there is now an attempt to revert this Article before the chain goes live. EOS Canada wanted to take some time to explain the change, and why you should support it too.
Hey @eos-canada.
I want to say that the community shares your frustration with the nonsensical decision from yesterday’s Go / No Go meeting.
Alex was as always the voice of reason and went above and beyond by collating and validating the first vote data. I am truly baffled by the floored logic displayed by some of the other (not all), candidates that have no technical or cautionary foundation.
For me this only deepens my commitment to promoting @eos-canada as a block producer as you have shown the qualities that we token holders as a community (at least everyone I talk and work with who are behind EOS), want and need.
Thank you :)
As always @eos-Canada, thanks for the great update.