RE: EOS CONSTITUTION: FINAL ARBITRATORS & NON-INITIATION OF FORCE?
Awesome Video and important questions you raise, I've been thinking of these two.
@icc: my assumption is that they are a renowned body in international finance regulation and it might be a wise decision because the Eos arbitration forums are basically not existent atm..
@Justice without force: I totally agree with the statement that justice doesn't work without the implementation of force. But I think what Dan is after here is non-violent in a physical sense rule of law, if you do bad on the Eos blockchain you will losse your tokens and get barred from ever joining again, but no police will break your door, wrestle you to the floor and drag you into prison, you get the idea I guess. But that is of course too narrow a view, and of course we are all happy for a police doing their dirty work off chain, and - hopefully -keeping eos bad actors from having a Hitman gunning down the arbitrator on their case Italian style, or competitors raiding the data centers of some block producer...
Hey @Champagnecrypto just found the explanatory article on the icc arbitration change:
https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/1089/rationale-for-changing-the-default-eos-arbitration-forum
Thanks for sharing.