You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Netflix binge watch of the weekend

in #entertainment6 years ago

So he dug the bullet out after according to them? was he a hunter?

He owned a .22 rifle. I don't know if he was actually a hunter or not. The gun was left over from the person who had lived in the trailer before him. That person testified in 2016 that the gun was his and he often shot targets all over the property, including near the garage (where the bullet was found). Over the course of his time at the home he estimated he shot over 3000 rounds from the .22 on the property.

The prosecution alleged that the bullet was a through and through, entering one side of the head and leaving from the other, winding up on the floor of Avery's garage. (We don't have a definitive cause of death since the victim's body was burned and all that was ever found were bone fragments).

There are two forensics questions around the bullet.

  1. does a .22 rifle have the power to go in one side of the skull, pass through the brain, and come out the other side. - The new defense lawyer brought a marksman expert to test the theory, who used two animal bones placed on either side of ballistic gel to replicate a head. The .22 he fired was unable to pass through both sides of the bone, instead lodging in the ballistic gel.

  2. A bullet that passed through a body should have trace elements of calcium and phosphorus remaining even after full examination. They are blowing up the image so large that we are talking about microns in size. The bullet that was alleged to be the cause of death had calcium but no phosphorus. The defense expert says calcium can be picked up literally anywhere, you have to have both to show that the bullet passed through bone.

Eliminating the bullet as cause of death does not necessarily prove Avery is innocent, but it is the evidence that was put forth by the prosecutor to get him convicted. If you can demonstrably prove it is not the actual cause of death, then the prosecutors case seems to unravel.

But apparently the court of Wisconsin doesn't buy it, since the guy is still in jail.

Sort:  

Yeah, I was wondering if that's even powerful enough the moment you mentioned that it was a .22.

They're saying he got a headshot with a .22 and it went through his skull and into wood? Yeah, bullshit. Technically, he could possibly get some kind of special high load bullet...but even then, that's not something just a casual user gets. Headshot, then burned the body sounds like more than someone that just happens to have a gun left over from a previous tenant. Was there blood fucking everywhere?

Were these people fucking morons? A bullet does not go through something without having any trace evidence of what it went though on it.

Eliminating the bullet as cause of death does not necessarily prove Avery is innocent, but it is the evidence that was put forth by the prosecutor to get him convicted. If you can demonstrably prove it is not the actual cause of death, then the prosecutors case seems to unravel.

Yeah, clearly it had no relation to whatever the actual cause of death was.

The guy could have killed him for all I know, but I doubt with a .22, and I doubt even further with some random bullet they found in the garage.

But apparently the court of Wisconsin doesn't buy it, since the guy is still in jail.

Yeah, well, it's a lot harder to get out once you are in.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63744.49
ETH 2639.10
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.77