Clear the pipes - Decentralized education to change the world

in #education6 years ago (edited)

I am not a big fan of the current setup of government authorities but the sad truth is that they do represent us. I am not talking simply because (for the most part) we vote them into their positions, I am speaking of the pipelines that got them there. The fact is that the people who populate governments, banks and corporations are people, just like us. You may argue this point of course but all of them have gone through the same cultural conditioning that trains them to behave in certain ways and given the position and pathway, we would likely do the same.

Targeting results isn't enough

Often, we look at the result of something and then try to change it directly, for example, numbers of women in STEM related fields which is low. Preferring women in the hiring practices doesn't actually solve the problem because it sets up an unhealthy rating system that isn't based on merit. To fix the numbers takes generations not a couple of election cycles. The reason is that there are more factors at play than just 'women don't have opportunity' which include a massive amount of social dynamics.

In Australia they ran a program that saw a massive increase of women in high school STEM programs but, when it came to University applications, the ratios remained unchanged. This is for various reasons with one being that men and women often have different interest areas that affect their decision making. This could be inherent in the organism or, socially learned but either way, it isn't going to be a 'quick fix' to change this, it is going to take a great deal of time.

Government is much the same, all education is much the same. Which is what I actually want to talk a little bit about.

Exclusion through education

Education systems are very narrow skill focused and have been designed this way to cater for governments and corporations who require various skills and numbers of participants to get their agendas completed. This has been this way since the industrial revolution.

The problem is that for various reasons, the narrow skillset rewarded by education is very exclusive, meaning that favours some types of people much more heavily than others and because of the way industry works, there are vast differences (average) results between those who fit the system and those who do not. Education is a sorting and ranking process engineered to push what industry needs to the top and let the rest scramble for whatever is left over, it is part of the mechanism that creates wealth inequalities and disenfranchisement of populations.

Narrow focus, leaky pipes

If we picture Steem as a representation of this, content that is Steem/development focus gets more support because the corporations (the larger accounts and investors) are interested in this area of the platform. They reward that content because that is what they need to support their agendas of platform growth. But, this will change over time with distribution, which is something that the real world is yet to learn because the education market is not a free market.

In the real world, the engineered and centralized environments are going to get increasingly volatile because the narrow and exclusive focus skills that once supported industry are going to support less and less as automation replaces more of the positions. This means there is a decreasing need for this type of education but, there is still the need for revenue from those same groups to maintain a consumer base and tax revenues to fund the very governments that engineered such a fragile system and then subsidized it heavily to remain narrow.

This very system they have created has developed a pipe network that feeds populations to all other positions, including the governments and corporations. It is a massive, massive institutionalized circlejerk of sorts that drives similar types of people into power positions who in turn, favour similar types of people. Cronyism.

When we look at the results of something and identify change is needed, it isn't good enough to attack the head alone, it has to be a holistic approach that heals the entire ecosystem. What I see as a potential driver of this is decentralized education which is already happening to some degree but with blockchains and cryptocurrencies, can happen to a much greater degree in time.

Free education

I say already happening because it is very hard but not impossible to self-train and create a career outside of the formal institutions. The hard part isn't getting access to the information required, it is convincing people programmed to favour formal education over self-taught passion learning. One of the leading authorities on AI learning left school at 12 as it didn't support his development style.

Decentralized education means that a free-market system can influence the education sector instead of a process of tailoring to the immediate needs of a corporation or government. This means that large populations of people will slowly organize and decide what skillsets are important and while to begin with, STEM is likely to be very strong, over time it will weaken and strengthen.

It will weaken because there will be more opportunity for people to diversify and educate in areas that are of interest to them rather than what is expected of them to participate in an economy. It will strengthen because those who are actually interested in STEM will focus their efforts there without the noise of others who are their because they have to be. Over time, this can have some profound effects on the entire ecosystem, including governments.

Governments aren't inherently evil

Changing the pipe network and diversifying what skills are wanted by the market means that there is going to be more distribution as to what skills are rewarded by that market. What this means is that there are less peaks in results and fewer lows. On top of this, the attitude of the market will change markedly as people start to not only embrace a wider range of skillsets but also benefit directly from being able to do more of what they enjoy without being penalized as heavily for it not being what a corporation wants of them. Rather than have a job monetized by a company, it is rewarded by the market directly.

This also changes the role of governments because through a (long) process of dissolution of narrow power, government becomes a population support function that has people working within it who are interested in supporting the community. This means that the cronyism that exists today because of the narrow agendas is removed and the people working in government are those interested in best servicing the infrastructure needs of the community that facilitate its strength as a unit, not as segments ranked on importance of how they best serve narrow agendas.

Decentalized communities

If we imagine Steem as a new form of government that focuses on the community (not there yet), the government benefits when the community benefits, and the community strength is in its ability to be inclusive, not exclusive. Even though there will be niches that have higher or lower rewards, distribution of resources and a free market system will slowly organize itself so that there are fewer high peaks and low troughs unless the market decides it.

What this means is that in time (a long time most likely) participation in the community is rewarded on the basis of what skillsets are deemed necessary for the community at any given time and when large populations are moving on a very diversified spectrum, there is less volatility but, it will continually shift without getting into positions that there is cataclysmic failure like we are likely approaching now with global economics.

Do what you want

Being part of a decentralized community means you are free to do as you please however, this doesn't guarantee return on what you do and, there is likely less support for those who choose not to participate in the community itself. Of course, there are a great deal of variables and options in this approach which is the point because it means that more people can be included without having to rely on making it through a fine-grained filtering system for a chance of success.

Upstreaming the future

Essentially (in my opinion) a decentralized community does a much better job of upstreaming challenges faced because rather than pulling information from a narrow set of points, it is in a constant negotiation looking for solutions without actually looking for solutions directly. This also means that less future problems are likely to arise as they are avoided in the pipelines before they have a chance to stabilize into institutional foundations.

Lowering costs and maintaining quality

What is also going to be a game changer in education across decentralized networks is that through the lower cost of infrastructure compared to centralized institutions, increasing numbers of people are able to have access to a massive range of resources that provide opportunity to develop as individuals without having to rely on an authority to provide and choose what is important. Combine this with the ability to create trust in information and there is a future potential that fields of study will get even stronger as the pool of participants is truly a global resource.

Where does this lead?

Hard to say but if all of these areas are going to concurrently be put under pressure from automation, what can happen is that people are able to spend more time doing what they want while having various needs catered for by the increasing capabilities of the automation. This could lead to a dystopia but if the pipelines are of the type that value community over narrow competition, there is the chance that existence and experience of the community ecosystem and the individual is one of flourishing, rather than degradation and zero sum returns.

In my opinion, this is not one of those 'in my lifetime' processes and I do not think that I am going to see much of the changes of this even if they are happening as we speak but for me, this is the bigger picture, the long, long, long-term view. What this requires of course is an increasing amount of participation and shift in values both from a moral perspective and an economic one, which is what is already happening here. Narrow perspective, crony systems do not give up their positions easily though which is why the values have to change.

As decentralized communities start to gather momentum and more participation takes place, the plumbing from the ground up starts to change its structure and the pipes that lead into the institutions will feed an increasing number of 'decentralized minds'. They will slowly disrupt at all levels of the centralized structure to the point that what was controlling and authoritative, now becomes a healthy system that supports the community.

Caveats

We are nowhere near this point now and although I have faith that it is possible, I am under no illusion that it is probable. There are no guarantees in this life but if we consider how much needless suffering there is in this world to date, looking for ways to improve experience for the greatest number of people isn't necessarily a bad way to waste a life. The game we play now can have ramifications that fundamentally change the experiences of those to come, even if will never live to see a smile on their face as they spend their days doing what they love.

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Sort:  

Education can become more efficient and effective, if the power of the current socioeconomic factions, or guild, of "educators" can be broken. Decentralized education apparatus can be equally, or more, effective in training the next set of bureaucrats and functionaries. How will a decentralized education platform determine certification and qualification regarding certain technical skills? Centralized training programs have minimal standard that must be met, before someone can become certified or qualified to become part of a technical group. If there is a centrally determined certification standards, then only the mode of information delivery is decentralized. The control continues remain within the hands of guilds.

If there is not to be certifying and qualifying central standard, then how will humans determine whom to hire when needing certain highly technical services? Furthermore, no human is equal in skill and talent, which includes information dissemination and training. How will the educators be assigned on a hierarchy, if there exists no centralized standard? The "do-it-yourself" model can only provide so much, and certain situations require professional intervention. Trust in professionals derives from trust in centralized standards, establishes by central authority, and more importantly, ruthlessly enforced by technical guilds with the assistance from the crown. How will humans in this decentralized scenario trust anyone?

It has been changes in technology that has led small tribes to centralization, it can be changes of technology that lead away from it. Not being able to answer questions today doesn't mean they are unanswerable. There is no universal code that I know of that says this is the best we can ever do as a species.

Humans organize in hierarchies and segregate according to class/caste because of the inherent reality of human nature and reality of inequality. There are certain aspects of sociopolitical organization that can be improved, but some other aspects of sociopolitical organization can not be changed. Someone will be in charge, and human political factionalism will continue, as long as men organize themselves into communities/societies. Unless "decentralization" denotes separated, fragmented, individual humans eeking out subsistence apart from other humans, centralized power structure alway remains. "Reform" is essentially discontented factions attempting to arrogate more power unto themselves at the expense of others. Nothing really changes in human sociopolitical drama.

Having just quit formal teaching I'm relying on education becoming more decentralised... I imagine the next financial crisis will help... once state education faces further cuts, parents will be forced to seek out privatised alternatives to supplement.

I also think this will happen in your lifetime... radical change to education that is.. the infrastructure-s already in place after all.

However, I'm not convinced block chain tech is vital - speaking as an education professional WordPress pretty much already does everything I need it to!

Posted using Partiko Android

However, I'm not convinced block chain tech is vital

I think it as the people see you out and look to rate, evaluate standards for some professions as well as pay, blockchains become a way to create trust and a trackable history without requiring a centralized authority to monitor.

The information is one thing but you still want to be able to predict if a plumber or a doctor have certain skills before they get to work.

I'm keeping an open mind... it'll be interesting to see how it all pads out.

On my to do list is to try and give people the option to pay for tuition with steem!

Posted using Partiko Android

For one, Does the gouvernment actually represnet us, the people? Or do they represent the mediasphere that programms sertain thinking that is wanted that guides voters? And how can any political organisation represent the people when none can at any time stand for the exact same as the people want everywhere at once, when what is the best that the people want for the people never is the same everywhere?

Secondly; is it really actually a problem that there isnt the same amount of men as women in any given workplace? May it actually be that one gender is better at certain things then the other? Dont we want the best able for the task at hand?

Also I would argue that; yes, governments is inherently evil, though not by the intent of the politicians necessarily. Mainly as centralized power is always corrupt. But a decentralized governing system is likely needed in any society. (take note of the wording;) )

But I do agree with the main issue here, that the educational system is broken and not functional for the people. And there is many ways to do it better then it currently is, and however that will be, it includes removing the concept of " documented knowledge from institutions".

For one, Does the gouvernment actually represnet us, the people?

Yes. all pipelines lead into all the systems we have. All of this is a creation of us over millennia. Change the feeding systems and everything else changes too.

Secondly; is it really actually a problem that there isnit the same amount of men as women in any given workplace?

No, it was an example about pipelines and differences as well as how central authorities aim to 'resolve' issues.

But a decentralized governing system is likely needed in any society. (take note of the wording;) )

Words are words and although people argue over them, the word is never the thing. You can call it all apples, oranges and old sneakers yet it doesn't change what they are at any given point.

But I do agree with the main issue here,

The other points are to bring the relevance of how current education helps lead to a polarized, broken, disenfranchised, exclusionary world. It doesn't have to though. People talk about increasing education which is fine but then they spread the same mechanism that fail to support the communities fully and instead encourage massive gaps in populations. Education is important but more important is the type of education and what is learned from it.

If we imagine Steem as a new form of government that focuses on the community (not their yet), the government benefits when the community benefits, and the community strength is in its ability to be inclusive, not exclusive.

If it doesn't give itself a legal monopoly on aggression, and doesn't assume authority over a specific area; it's not a government in any sense of the word.

What is a better word do you think?

Organisation.
Like a darts club. If you'd like to be a member, here are the rules.

This is well outside my general thought areas :)

Governments aren't inherently evil

I noticed ;)

I see them as a tool that we use. unfortunately they overreach their constraints because of the way we have used them. they are just management systems, change the content and they function differently. Much like the way guns operate, they are just tools as well and the impact they make depends on the users.

I must say, this issue has been on the mind of many. But i just know that the situation the world is right now didn't start in a day but took a lot of centuries. Just like u said, there is no quick fix to this. But that doesnt mean there is no hope. If we start now with the right steps, the next generation will thank us for it.
Then again, what are the right steps? Its all expiremental.

If we start now with the right steps, the next generation will thank us for it.
Then again, what are the right steps? Its all expiremental.¨

Thankful or not, they inherit what we leave them. Life is all a big experiment of sorts.

Hi @tarazkp!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.106 which ranks you at #255 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 1 places in the last three days (old rank 254).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 298 contributions, your post is ranked at #15.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.36
TRX 0.12
JST 0.039
BTC 70112.96
ETH 3549.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.71