The fallacy of endless economic growth
Yesterday, I was reading this interesting article from Christopher Ketcham in the Standard Globe :
The fallacy of endless economic growth
When I was reading it, I thought that the author could have been faster on his argument and that today everybody agree that "someone who thinks that an infinite growth in a limited planet is possible is either a fool either an economist."
But when I reach the comment section, I discovered that the number of fools and economists was still quite important.
How can you explain that based on the same economic and scientific data, people can reach such opposite conclusions ?
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Jul 28. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $9.11 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jul 28 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.