Can't The Government Bail Me Out Of Debt?
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://i654.photobucket.com/albums/uu270/Shimokita/Will%20you%20lose%20everything%20because%20of%20debt.jpg)
In the event of a major financial crisis, would it be possible for the national government to bail out the public instead of bailing out banks?
Well, yes and no.
If the banks are in trouble because too many people are defaulting on their loans, allowing them to go out of business could spell disaster for the economy. If they're big enough, it could affect the global economy and even your plans for your dream vacation.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://i654.photobucket.com/albums/uu270/Shimokita/a%20bank%20is%20in%20trouble.jpg)
Or maybe you think that nationalising the banks (i.e. have the government take them over) is the way to go? You might be right with that, too, but there are lots of people who would object because it's giving the government too much control or would become more inefficient or... just trust me that there will be objections.
Bailouts
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://i654.photobucket.com/albums/uu270/Shimokita/Bank%20bailouts%20sneaky%20sneaky.jpg)
So, the government could have bailed out the public instead of banks?
I already said yes and no, but... fine, I'll give you more of an explanation. A quick one.
If the government had given money to the public instead of the banks on condition that they use it to pay down their debts first (and they could keep whatever was left over), then the public and the banks would no longer have been in trouble.
The government wouldn't have had to give people enough money to pay off the loan in full, though. Giving them enough to bring their repayments down to a more manageable level would have done the job nicely.
Wouldn't we need to pay more tax to pay for that?
Nope. The fact that people couldn't repay the loans was a symptom of there not being enough money circulating around the economy. By creating more money and injecting it into the economy via these bailouts, the government would have made things better for everyone.
Doesn't money printing cause inflation?
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://i654.photobucket.com/albums/uu270/Shimokita/we%20told%20the%20public%20that%20they%20still%20owed%20the%20banks.jpg)
I'm up to my eyeballs in debt now - what should I do?
Well, don't turn to crime. That's bad. Instead, turn to the criminals in government and demand a modern debt jubilee. The name sounds like a party, doesn't it? They'll love the sound of it.
If they say no, then you must tell everyone you know about the politician who's a party pooper and they'll be better off having a party animal get elected instead!
If you don't ask, you don't get!
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by Penston from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP. Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.
Interesting article, thanks for posting!
I guess the short-term vs long-term question is key - and in general public reaction is always short-term focused. Politicians should be acting in everyone's long-term interests, but I guess they fail there much of the time...
Cheers
Inserting a plug for another economist I enjoy- David Graeber's a frequent debt jubilee advocate. If you haven't read it yet, his book Debt: The First 5000 Years is well worth a read.