Increased Carbon Levels are Not Causing Global Warming
#
Live Stream Summary:
The Global Warming Hysteria that Carbon Dioxide created by burning fossil fuels is warming the planet is utter nonsense garbage to sell the idea we need a carbon tax to create a global government.
You see the UN / IMF banksters cannot have an actual global government without some form of taxation to pay for said ridiculous monstrosity that will be their God damned NWO, so they are pushing the idea of Carbon taxes to bring forth a global tax collected by the World Bank.
Carbon Dioxide is not causing Global Warming. Burn as much fuel as you desire driving your V8. End of Story.
Help me out by up-voting and re-steeming this and or by making me an Independent Journalist by funding me on Patreon with monthly support. My Patreon
Don't forget to follow me @TitusFrost for more of my work coming in the near future...
You can also connect with me on:
- My Patreon
- Titus Frost YouTube
- Lulz Machine YouTube
- Twitter: @ImperatorTruth (When I am not suspended)
- FedBook: "The Lost Truth"
- Minds.com: "TitusFrost"
- My Vid.Me Channel
- My Published Book: "The Lost Truth"
- Gab.ai: TitusFrost
- BitChute
- Check out my book on OpenLibrary
- Read my Book The Lost Truth for Free online
- DTube Channel: https://dtube.video/c/titusfrost
► Watch on DTube
► Watch Source (IPFS)
Don't forget to follow me @TitusFrost for more of my work coming in the near future...
You can also connect with me on:
- My Patreon
- Titus Frost YouTube
- Lulz Machine YouTube
- Twitter: @ImperatorTruth (When I am not suspended)
- FedBook: "The Lost Truth"
- Minds.com: "TitusFrost"
- My Vid.Me Channel
- My Published Book: "The Lost Truth"
- Gab.ai: TitusFrost
- BitChute
- Check out my book on OpenLibrary
- Read my Book The Lost Truth for Free online
- DTube Channel: https://dtube.video/c/titusfrost
► Watch on DTube
► Watch Source (IPFS)
And how are you proving this? By sitting in your car and fighting against world renowned scientists. Like if you agree with this bull.
Ah, has anyone considered radiogenic heat? Of course, there's nothing we can do about radioactive decay below Earth's surface, but have you thought about how much heat is being produced by all things nuclear topside?
Wikipedia:
The radioactive decay of elements in the Earth's mantle and crust results in production of daughter isotopes and release of particles and heat energy, or radiogenic heat. Four radioactive isotopes are responsible for the majority of radiogenic heat, uranium-238 (238U), uranium-235 (235U), thorium-232 (232Th), and potassium-40 (40K).
The flow of heat from Earth's interior to the surface is estimated at 47 terawatts (TW)[1] and comes from two main sources in roughly equal amounts: the radiogenic heat produced by the radioactive decay of isotopes in the mantle and crust, and the primordial heat left over from the formation of the Earth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_internal_heat_budget
Radioactive decay accounts for half of Earth's heat
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/jul/19/radioactive-decay-accounts-for-half-of-earths-heat
John Chapman at 14:46 PM on 27 July, 2010
Just for completeness, in case someone wonders about other factors, the contribution from another nuclear source - the decay of radioactive elements in the Earth's crust (40TW) - amounts to near 0.1 W/m2 which is much more significant than the waste heat.
https://skepticalscience.com/Waste-heat-vs-greenhouse-warming.html
Fukushima, Chernobyl, Cold War nuclear weapons testing, present weapons testing, nuclear power plants, nuclear dump sites, open, abandoned uranium mines, coal fly ash - it's radioactive...etcetera...What kind of impact does all of this radiogenic heat have on global warming?
Congratulations @titusfrost! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCommenting for Manbearpig:
I am super serial
Wow amazing sources and facts you got there. Surely the immense climate change in the last 50 years just coincidentally happened
actually the data has been change to match the hype.
Actually, we don't really understand all the causes of climate change. Science is in the infancy of understanding the dynamic climate patterns that we know occurred in the past, and CO2 can't explain. For all we know, CO2 emissions may be keeping us from entering another ice age, and until we can isolate the variables and understand all the conditions that cause our climate to drastically change in a geological instant, then anyone saying that more/less CO2 is needed is full of shit.
After 50 years of research you cannot claim climate change related research is still in it's infancy stage.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm
A world government would have an easier tool to get money. Print money and let inflation do the work.
CO2 greenhouse effect is just one in many factors driving climate change. We have hundreds of thousands of years of temperature records thanks to ice cores, and there have been numerous huge shifts in climate in Earth's history that CO2 doesn't begin to explain.
While everything you say is true (as far as I know at least), you still cannot say CO2 is not the leading cause of todays climate change
Btw, props to you for discussing in a nice and non-offensive way! Not sure this would have been possible on youtube :)
You also can't say that it is the leading source of climate change. It almost certainly is a major contributor based on the leading science, but you can't say global warming isn't bad for the long term well being of the planet or humanity, its an unfounded claim and the vast majority of climate change models have been extremely innacurate.
There are so many contributing variables, its like trying to predict the stock market, but you've gotta wait 100 years instead of a couple days to see if your model is correct, then you habe to refine your model and retest. We only have ONE sample to study or test, that's an insanely limited dataset. Imagine if we only had one person to study for medicine, how fast would it advance?
The popular claims about climate change science aren't even supported by the science, they're just myths and untested hypotheses floating around culture. People believe them because of tribalist peer pressure, "because science", because everyone wants to be perceived as smart, no one wants to be insulted.
It IS a propaganda tribalist movement, just look at the attacks on people who are so called "climate change deniers".
That's what happens when you collude with government. Churches, corporations, or science. Things get politicized, things get corrupted, it turns into propaganda to get a politician elected. The politician on the committee holding your paycheck over your head, favors get traded. The slightest bias for political favor is compounded over time, but when it grows big enough to notice, the corrupt have to admit their error, or pretend its not an error. Most people are good people, or they think they are, they try to be. The cognitive dissonance of the error and minor justifications obfuscate the obvious until they are blind. It happens in every context of human life, I might be doing it right now.
That's why when you see people attacking someone for having a different idea, voicing a different opinion, or just asking questions, that's cultural tribalism, its not rational, its not scientific, its very unlikely to be correct. Correct ideas are easily defensible, people who are willing to talk calm and civil, without acting perpetually irritated, those are usually the people who believe they are right, they're trying to be intellectually honest.
Last paragraph *that's intellectual tribalism
We now have emails and documents confirming that 3 of the biggest oil companies confirming they knew CO2 emissions cause climate change... that's all the proof I need.
Then you're gullible, and the reason society is the way it is today. Oil companies are involved in the whole scheme/scam.
We have emails and documents? Which ones, and where? Let me guess, anonymous source?
No anonymous sources, documentation from the law firms that are bringing the case against them... it's official documentation from their corporate correspondence. Look it up. No anonymous sources. But let me ask where are YOUR sources, there are none in your article, but thanks for insulting me and saying the world is the way it is because of people like me.
The entire solar system is warming- do your research and you'll see what NASA knows but is concealing because it will destroy their man made climate change CONTROL scheme
As you are aware in recent history and the present there are huge Redwood trees. At one time all the continents had massive forests. It is possible that there might have been trees substantially larger than even the largest trees that we have now.
Okay so perhaps the trees are not as large as Devil's Tower but I the largest tree in recent history was 390 feet tall. As you said in previous periods carbon dioxide was higher during the period of the dinosaurs. Keep in mind that the earth tries to maintain homoeostasis. Returning to levels of higher CO2 will require more vegetation - which we no longer have. We no longer have the forests nor water life forms to buffer huge quantities. Roughly a billion years ago Venus was comparable to the way Earth is now. In fact one of the theories around panspermia is that life originated on Venus Source: School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University
At some point there was a cataclysmic increase in CO2 which has lead to Venus to have a surface temperature of 864 degrees Fahrenheit.
I agree that not all climate change can be attributed to human behaviour but perhaps there is a synergy or even a catalytic reaction going on.
A Carbon Tax may be a way that the UN can generate revenue but it has another purpose as well. It is an incentive to explore alternative fuels. Instead of arguing against the Carbon Tax ... promote Thorium.
After 50 years of research you cannot claim climate change related research is still in it's infancy stage.////////
Nice work . Thanks. Followed
You can't have a rational public discussion about man made climate change without including the facts regarding the intentional and prolific geo-engineering programs that have been carried out by goverments and other international organisations over the last 50+ years. These have been scientifically proven to exist by the scientific community.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org
different subject.
Great Words to live by!!!!