You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Hey Steemit Libertarians, I debated the death penalty with a conservative...
I have scars all over my body, many from executions done to me as a child, my adult teeth are mostly all ruined I was pandered to a dentist who took sexual pleasure from harming me and other children I assume... so to your point, yes. We have proof.
"I have scars all over my body, many from executions done to me as a child,"
You were executed many times as a child?
This was done by the individual not the state.
The State is involved as are Police. And they are obligated to act. Wrong again you are. State acted on some and on some they allowed others to do it etc...
This does not mean that you were executed.
You market too hard and make too much misguided effort to find fault. Bad faith. Fraud. Try asking direct questions about the events first.
Or how about you tell a complete and coherent story. I shouldn't have to tease the events out of you.
If you had included the events you might have made a stronger case. That is, of course, if you know what the meaning of execute and euthanize are but I don't think you do.
And since you can't define murder or treason properly and offer false equivalency on someone's crime that seems, err, foolish really.
You need to actually read what I have written as I have explicitly defined treason per the US Constitution.
Murder is defined as "the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought" by Merriam-Webster.
Finally, I have made no false equivalency's just pointed out issues in your comments. If you disagree then here is the definition of false equivalency, from SkepticalRaptor, " logical fallacy where there appears to be a logical equivalence (usually in quantity and quality of evidence) between two opposing arguments, but when in fact there is one side has substantially higher quality and quantity of evidence. However, there is no equivalence between the two sides of a “debate” when one is supported by evidence, and the other side has no evidence, or evidence of low quality." If you think that I made a false equivalence then support your position by quoting the false equivalence.
I'd say overall your views are of no use to anyone. Given how misguided you are. And how closed minded you are.
It sounds like someone doesn't like having the errors and inconsistencies of their comments pointed out to them. Just FYI, I am not closed minded and I have not offered any evidence to support that false assertion.