Is it in the hope of free speech or is it for capitalism? Idk,but most stuff people are ranting online shouldn't be monetized... Let them run a server on their home computer with their own content, they can hide it behind some technology stacks that can act as a proxy to protect their feeble little castle called home from swatting and what not, but I disagree that steem needs these people. For what? So others can downvote em into obscurity and they can rage against steem later? Again, thanks but no thanks.
Maybe if we lived in a world where people just take the action of blocking someone, whisper to themselves 'not in my house' and move on with their lives.
There is Soo much wrong with this mindset of "bring in the shadowbanned people",... This infrastructure isn't for them either, the big frontends will ban them... As steemit has done in the past and others when presented with a legal threat will also.... Unless you are also pushing for more client side apps that pull directly from the blockchain.. using steemit as an example here is in very bad taste... Anyways, have a beautiful day, gotta get to the Halloween party we are throwing tonight, just wanted to hop on steem for a second and saw this.... And wasted my valuable steem time reading this post that's right up there with my actifit shit posts and wasted more time replying. LoL. I'm not mad, or upset or any of that, and I'll still upvote, but I believe you should reflect on your beliefs and why you have them. Or something. Rock on brother!!