My NOLA City Hall, 5G Adventure: A NOTICE of LIABILITY

After delaying the deployment (barely!) of 5G in our community for several months after we asked City Council for a single solitary study that proved 5G is safe for humanity, & after the health panel promised by them, not only failed to include any health experts, but also denied us equal place to bring MEDICAL doctors and EMF experts in to testify electronically, nor did they validate our place at the panel had we had the$1,000's together to fly them down, keeping us in the dark as to what was going on, ALWAYS at the last minute, while the industry experts had plenty of time to fly down and be there and plenty of time to represent. FOR POSTERITY

Dear Council Members Williams, et al...

I am writing today in hopes of having questions answered that have yet to be answered that were first asked 6 months ago, when I and others first attended the Smart & Sustainable meetings to voice some of our deep concerns for the health, safety, and security of the citizens of New Orleans in regards to this historic 5G rollout.

Because if we are to accept that our lives rest in the balance of an opinion that we believe contradicts the science which proves EMF is indeed hazardous to humanity, then we will need to know exactly which studies SPECIFICALLY you're basing your opinion on. 

1) Which STUDIES SPECIFICALLY have proven 5G technology is safe for humanity? NOT which “agency” has a set of studies, but rather, which scientific study are you siting exactly as evidence that 5G is safe for biological systems? 

We've poured over the studies by FCC, ACS, NIH, FDA, NCI, ICNIRP, & have found none that do this so we ask for you to share with us the specific studies. 

2) RE: Resolution R-18-536 page 3 paragraph 2 states:

“WHEREAS, the Council also desires to incorporate public safety technology, such as gunshot sensors, smart street lights, crime stat data bases, traffic and crowd management technology, etc., into the grid and its Smart Cities initiative;” 

a) Exactly what is “crowd management technology”,  b) what does ETC.  mean EXACTLY, and c) how is 5G and the IoT going to help implement that?

3) We were told there would be an opt out option because “nothing will ever be forced onto anyone’s property or anyone’s residence”. Since EMF is scientifically & measurably proven to radiate any given field, and since our bodies are our properties, HOW MAY WE OPT OUT of the citywide radiation?

4) The FCC only states how much radiation we can be exposed to at any one given time, but who is overseeing how much radiation total we are exposed to in an overlapped field?? If there is no one whose job it is to see to our cumulative exposure, HOW CAN WE CREATE an agency that will be liable for seeing to it?

a) Who’s manning the cocktail?? 
b) If no one, then how do we remedy that?

We pray this story ends in greater cooperation with all that which is in public interest & seek to understand the opinions on which you based your actions on, as we can not yet make any sense of your decision.

<hr><a href='https://d.tube/#!/v/nolabutterfly/qpvia5oo3kl'> ▶️ DTube</a><br /><a href='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuTdG8TFDEo'> ▶️ YouTube</a>