Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-yearexamination
Sex differences in cognitive ability level and cognitive ability pattern or tilt (e.g., math > verbal) have beenlinked to educational and occupational outcomes in STEM and otherfields. The present study examines cognitiveability tilt across the last 35 years in 2,053,265 academically talented students in the U.S. (SAT, ACT, EXPLORE)and 7119 students in India (ASSET) who were in the top 5% of cognitive ability, populations that largely feedhigh level STEM and other occupations. Across all measures and samples, sex differences in ability tilt wereuncovered, favoring males for math > verbal and favoring females for verbal > math. As ability tilt increased,sex differences in ability tilt appeared to increase. Additionally, sex differences in tilt increased as ability se-lectivity increased. Broadly, sex differences in ability tilt remained fairly stable over time, were consistent acrossmost measures, and replicated across the U.S. and India. Such trends should be carefully monitored given theirpotential to impact future workforce trends.
Source of shared Link
Flagged for plagiarism and spam!
https://www.psychologytoday.com/sites/default/files/waihodgesmakel2018.pdf
@steemflagrewards
Steem Flag Rewards mention comment has been approved! Thank you for reporting this abuse, @steemseph.
You are posting content that is not yours by copying it without sourcing or manipulating it to pass plagiarism tools.
You are repetitively posting the same content or recyling contents after a period of time.
This post was submitted via our Discord Community channel. Check us out on the following link!
SFR Discord
Follow on flag for spam @steemflagrewards
Follow on flag for plagiarism @steemflagrewards.
Just curious if all @dlike users are getting on that list? If that platform isn‘t save to use then I‘m sorry, I didn‘t know that, if not then I‘m wondering where the problem is since I am just using the dApp as intended. Thank you.
Furthermore your source is wrong since I got this from here. https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2018-wai.pdf
Posted using Partiko iOS
Why are you sharing this link? What does it add to the conversation? How does it warrant rewards to just share someone else's work? Who are you trying to engage?
As i said. I an using a DApp the way it is advertised. If that doesn‘t fit then maybe engage the creators of dlike and work with them if you take such issue with it. As for why i am sharing this stuff. Because i find it interesting and want other people to read it aswell which perfectly aligns with dlike.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Does the app have a way for you to add comments to tell your human readers why they should click the link? I don't use it, so I don't know.
Why would anyone wanting this info look for it here instead of going to the source? Why did you share it here, now, by these means? Those questions are for you, not the app devs.