Even at Harvard -- Or Especially at HarvardsteemCreated with Sketch.

in #diversity7 years ago

A year back, I did a piece (http://uberthoughtsusa.blogspot.com/2015/12/and-stupid-shall-inherit-earth.html) which included a lengthy reference to the Harvard placemat scandal, wherein its "Office of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion" had to retract placemats it had created to tell students how to answer questions. The answers, of course, were the oh, so politically correct ones, meaning that the University believed that its students were incapable either of answering the questions lucidly without help, or just incapable of giving the answer Harvard wanted them to.

The university, of course, had to apologize and withdraw the placemats, but not before I got a very widely-read post written about it. So, thanks.

But then I got a bug up my you-know-what about what an "Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion" actually did, and whether the old-money donors to the university hanging out at various Harvard Clubs were all that happy about what it might be, you know ... doing. There was no better way than to look at its Twitter account, right?

So that's what I did. And boy, is that interesting. Harvard's T. H. Chan School of Public Health has an Office of Diversity and Inclusion with a Twitter account. Yes, they do. I sincerely hope that, even named as that, it is indeed the same office that was named in the news story; I would be aghast if there were multiple offices at Harvard paying people to do whatever such offices do. But they had a Twitter account, so for the purposes of this piece -- good enough.

That account posted 15 tweets in the week before this piece was originally written. Fifteen is a lot of tweets for an office that one would think would be more focused on dealing with student issues, rather than broadcasting them ... at least until you read what those tweets actually are. So let's take a look.

First, here is a list of just the hashtags from just those 15 tweets and one from a few days earlier (mentally insert the hashtag):
Islamaophobia
NoThisIsn'tTheOnion
VAWA
genderINequality
EndYouthHomelessness
dropthecharges
lgbt
LegalDiscrimination
Harvard
TitleIX
immigration
norway
genderviolence
leadingtheway
translivesmatter
2015inReview
whiteprivilege

Many of the tweets referenced online articles. These included one asserting that 23 "transwomen" [sic] were killed in the USA; one on Norway teaching Muslim immigrants why it is OK for men and women to hug and kiss in public; one pointing to a finding that a woman in jail had killed herself; one how colleges are getting waivers from the Title IX regulations; one about punishment for a disruptive teenager in a high school in another state on a different coast; one citing that the USA is one of only three countries not mandating paid maternity leave; one about "toxic masculinity"; one about the Virginia school system closed because a teacher gave a "calligraphy lesson in Arabic" (making the students write a Muslim declaration); and one about fixing the prison system and the immigration system.

I am really trying to understand how some of these articles -- and some of the hashtags, particularly the whiteprivilege one -- are associated with the mission of the university, and even associated with the office itself. Title IX? I suppose. Norway trying to teach unwilling Muslims to kiss in public? Not so much. But I suppose that is for the university and those who donate to its rather gargantuan endowment to decide.

What I don't get is what the rationale is that would have the school let any office, with people it pays salaries to, put out a tweet with a hashtag "whiteprivilege." That article link, by the way, was to a piece touching on affirmative action in a case before the Supreme Court. White privilege is a term that is offensive on its surface -- offensive, for example, to descendants of immigrants who came from Ireland and Italy 100 years ago and had to scrap for a living; people from eastern Europe, hated there and hated here when they arrived, who had to work hard to make lives.

It is seemingly NOT offensive, though, to the privileged dweebs populating the Office of Equity and Whatever at Harvard, who apparently have plenty of time to search for and tweet out any link to a far leftist-slanted article they can find. I suppose I would be happy with a job like that, except that I'd also occasionally have to deal with the over-privileged dweebs complaining about stuff, just like the ones at Oberlin complaining about their undercooked sushi.

I could handle that, though. Think that Harvard would hire me to staff an Office of Conservative Value Promotion?

Copyright 2017, 2015 by Robert Sutton

Sort:  

Sadly, I suspect each "school" within the university has its own office dedicated to diversity. Mostly because they don't have much to actually do, so you can pack them with unqualified minorities in order to boost the percentage of non-whites on staff.

Anyway, to the extent that there might be any rationale for having an office dedicated to diversity and inclusion, it certainly should limit itself to, you know, addressing those issues within the school. It's thoroughly inappropriate for the office to spend its time on political issues that aren't remotely relevant to the school's diversity or sense of "inclusion" among its "diverse" folks. Shame on Harvard.

Of course, Alfred. And it's worse that they have more than one, if they do, because clearly they have too much time on their hands if they're able to go tweeting out links to stories not associated with their mission, whatever that may be, and to create placemats to tell students how to answer when their parents ask them why we need 10,000 phony Syrian refugees.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.17
JST 0.029
BTC 69187.87
ETH 2486.25
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.53