You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Hello...my name is Everitt Mickey and
I don't recall mentioning libertarianism
(false equivalency fallacy).
ZAP doesn't have that in it's definition.
'ZERO Aggression Principle"
three words..what's so hard to understand?
How you're for zero aggresion in an aggression tolerant society.
I'm not FOR anything
(in the sense that you imply)
that would be ME telling others what to think.
Anarchists don't do that.
So you telling me what anarchists don't do when I asked a straightforward and simple question which is pertinent as the entire argument follows crudely Anarchist is me, anarchy is zap, i am adult, but thanks for telling me what you think anarchists do or don't.
yet ANOTHER logical fallacy...you are just full of them.
All I said (reading comprehension is a thing)
is that
(that would be me)
am an anarchist.
an individual
I don't need someone else to tell me how to think
or to behave
that's the
"no rulers" part.
as such I'm not telling you
or anyone
what to do or think either
that would make me your ruler
no thanks..
(thinks of this as a public service announcement)
is that so hard?
Exactly which logical fallacy is that and why and how does it apply? You are an anarchist, and now you're telling me that you won't tell me what to think, as if I asked your opinion or thoughts, when I asked to explain how are you a part of a aggression tolerant society while being for Zero tolerance to aggression, exactly what you denied even though you clearly dedicated an article to, which begins with I am an anarchist, hilariously though you'd sooner deny that and deny any kind of principle, especially reason, because you avail to consider that someone querying you for your opinion or thoughts means they have availed themselves of sovereignty, and next youll tell me that I implied for you to tell me what or how to think and accuse me of whatever implications conveniently avoiding the obvious question: how can you be for Zero Aggression Principle (I'll call you aggression intolerant) in a society that is tolerant of aggression?
I've dealt with you before..before you changed your screenname.
think what you want to think.
Telling me to think what I want to think since you have no argument, what was my screen name before I changed it, since I haven't changed it once this is the blockchain old man.
I'm not making an argument.
I'm merely stating a fact.
I AM an anarchist.
You're being very rude and combative.