Linksautonome vs. Rechtsextreme
Liebe Steemer,
ich habe ein paar Fragen zu den gewalttätigen Ausschreitungen beim G20-Gipfel.
Warum werden Linksextreme Linksautonome genannt?
Inwiefern sind diese autonom? Sind das nicht eher Lebensversager, die vom Staat eine Grundversicherung beziehen und damit genau das Gegenteil von autonom, nämlich hochgradig abhängig?
Warum verwendet Focus im Titel die Wörter "Linksautonome" und "Rechtsextreme"? Sind nicht beides Extreme?
Gibt es einen Unterschied zwischen linksextrem und rechtsextrem? (Ich konnte noch keinen finden)
Was meint Ihr dazu?
Und: wie sollte die Regierung einerseits mit den Verbrechern vom G20-Gipfel umgehen und andererseits langfristig mit dem Extremismus- und Terrorismusproblem verfahren?
wenigstens noch was Lustiges:
Und wir die Steuerzahler bezahlen sie alle:
und ueber die GEZ auch die Berichterstattung
Was vergessen?
Haha @roy2016...`Sie wohnen nicht nur bei Mutti-sie tragen auch ihre Unterwäsche...Lol
Also, in meinen Augen will die linke 68er Generation, die Deutschland seit Jahrzehnten regiert (besetzen einflussreiche Positionen in Schulen, Gerichten und natürlich den Massenmedien) von ihrem Versagen ablenken. Die "Linksautonomen" sind wesentlich gewaltbereiter als "Rechtsextreme".
Ich will hier sicher nicht aufwägen, wer braver und wer "böser" ist. Arschlöcher gibt es überall, keine Frage!
Aber für mich zählt eine Grundregel: Wer BLINDE GEWALT ausübt hat die volle Härte des Gesetzes zu spüren. Und was hier in HH gelaufen ist von Polizeiseiten war nicht durchschlagend. Wenn das wirklich alles war, was die Polizei draufhat - dann ists mit der "inneren Sicherheit" nicht mehr weit her in diesem Land......
Danke earnfast, das sehe ich ganz ähnlich. Wer Gewalt ausübt muss nicht nur die volle Härte der Gesetze und Regeln spüren. Wer Gewalt ausübt, muss nach Möglichkeit gestoppt werden. Lieber einen toten und/oder verletzten Gewalttäter, als einen unschuldig Beteiligten, der nur zur falschen Zeit am falschen Ort war.
There's absolutely major differences between the left and the right, one of which being that the right actually cares about their people, culture, and country, that's what the right is all about.
The left is about being useful idiots for communism, controlled by Soros money, while letting in a bunch of FUCKED UP "migrants" to destroy Germany, it's people, and culture.
I think that's probably the biggest difference between the left and the right, and it should be recognized.
Lets be honest here, Germany was WAY better off under Hitler.
Germany was never worse off than under Hitler. Even if I don't like Merkel and her government at all, you can't compare today with the Third Reich. Only Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot were as bad as Hitler.
Nope, the German people were happy under Hitler, this alone makes him better than Merkel. I don't know what you heard, but Hitler was an awesome leader, his people LOVED him.
When you can walk among your nation's people without bodyguards you know you're doing the right thing as a fuhrer. There's no comparing Hitler to Stalin, Merkel, or Pol pot. He was better than all of them and by far. Look into the wellbeing of 1930-1940s Germany, see for yourself.
Nazi-ruled Germany is what it looks like when a country's gov't actually cares about it's own people, the germans were happy, healthy, and doing well financially under Hitler's rule. They would not be invaded by middle eastern and north african "migrants" back then I can tell you that much.
He was loved by a part of the population because of his Keynesian / socialist economic policies and because a part of the population was / is just crazy.
There were many people who hated him. He needed Bodyguards as well as today's politicians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assassination_attempts_on_Adolf_Hitler
And what about the German Jews? What about the German Socialists / Social Democrats? What about the disabled? What about the homosexuals?
Germany was way wealthier before Hitler rose to power. He was just an evil, brutal dictator.
All of that is wrong, if you got your info from wiki you only got one side of the story as usual, it's been admitted that jews actually pay people to edit wiki articles so that they contain certain whitewashed info supporting their side of the story basically.
The Germans were impoverished before Hitler rose to power actually, the price of bread in german marks could fill a wheelbarrow before he got elected, that's why he got elected, and he fixed Germany's economy with national socialism.
The people Hitler was against were the communists who were invading and degrading Germany, as well as the violent "social democrats" who were the equivalent of Antifa at the time.
I know we in the west only ever get one side of the story, but if you look into the other side deep enough you realize Hitler and the national socialists were in fact the good guys. I know this is shocking to hear, but it's the truth.
I would only ever recommend wiki for technical stuff, when it comes to political matters on the other hand... I would recommend strongly against getting your information from that site.
The Germans who elected Hitler were far from crazy, inflation and WWI has damaged Germany horribly and made it's people poor and starving, the election of Hitler was a valid action at the time, it was legitimate and any nation would have done the same under the circumstances.
Don't be fooled by certain mainstream narratives when it comes to Hitler, a sucker is born every day and pushed through the meat grinder of popularized political narratives, that's why guys like me exist. Someone's got to correct the record.
I can't believe it. This is just ridiculous.
Please leave my profile and never come back!
Only thing ridiculous here is the average internet user's resistance to facts and full trust of government-given historical narratives.
"Facts" from an antisemitic Nazi conspiracy theorist...