You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Delegation Issue
This definition eats it own tail. Steem's proposed value to the external universe where money comes from is that it should support the production of content that people want to consume. If "high quality content" is "content which contributes to Steem" then there's no external value and no reason for anyone outside to want any.
Which is where we are today.
Hah, you manage to invalidate your own argument in the very same paragraph.
If you believe that producing content that people want to consume is the best way to attract money then by all means vote for it. Personally, I believe that some such content does so, but not all, and I believe that some contributions bring value apart from (what is traditionally known as) producing content. Where our votes align, the rewards paid will be the greatest, where they don't, rewards will be smaller.
What boggles my mind is everyone trying to fit what "quality content" is into one short definition.
How about dot dot dot we go case by case.
Id wager that by going case by case more often then not we would have concensus about what is quality, does it provide value, etc.
Posted using Partiko Android
Case by case is the reality, no matter what people say.
Glad you're still here. Keep crashing the gates of this party.