You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The myths of decentralized social media platforms versus the economic realities.
I think a few things which may help include: The voting for witnesses needs to change to a formula where wishes of the majority of the people cannot be over ridden by a very large account. The Steem on exchanges should not be used by exchanges to control governance, so a delay in the ability to vote for witnesses is needed.
Yes, the exchanges are a bit problematic. But how can you make the first thing - the majority of people not overvoted by very large accounts? Isn't it fair for those who have big stake to have a huge voice? I am thinking of it but no decision came to my mind. Also, the circle-voting which might be happening between those who are delegated, is there any chance to avoid it?