You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is a major attack on free speech inevitable?
governance that controls the network isn't dictated by any elite group or trusted authority, but instead by the ideals of the community in question.
Essentially, we've finally figured out a way to automate the human element (corruption) out of the governance model.
That sounds nice but its not how it works. Steemit is most certainly controlled by a self appointed elite. How can anyone deny it?
It was that elite that froze the accounts.
They do not want relinquish their domination of the top 20 witnesses
indeed, and is direct mass mob rule really the best way to organise ourselves? i'd rather it lead to a permanent conservatism (stalemate,) if the network is safe and equitable in the first place.
I agree. The ultimate goal of any legal system (code version) should be to reach a steady-state, where no further revisions are needed.
100% this.