I fear for my life's data. I fear for my life's data, too.
I fear for my life's data. (Originally coined at https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101316950872174, https://twitter.com/contechtext/status/1374007220795498498, https://twitter.com/prosodyCONTEXTe/status/1374022375130464257, https://twitter.com/prosodyContext/status/1374037454890622979)
I fear for my iife's data, too.
I fear for my life's data, because other people are paranoid about their life's data.
I fear for my life's data, because other people fear for their life's data.
Is it a 'Right to be Remembered' (coining) versus "Right to be Forgotten" (coined) issue, a Social-Memory Issue (coining) as Social_Issue_(human) (coined) meets Memory_Issue_(technology) (coined) issue?
Personally, I fear for my life's data because I want to keep/prove data, whereas other people fear their life's data in terms of not wanting to keep/prove data. (I ask if "Realityl" only works if we keep that data long-term, is a vote/grade for mom er dad a permanent timestamped record signed just like at an election/detector/testification/test?, and what that proves/means.)
The only theoretical way for Realityl.info (a permanent familial/home grading record) to work, is if the "Total Information Awareness" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness) is classified (confidentially? You read/write alone in a voting booth?) for the individual (including all family members, is each family member an individual?).
Language needs to change?
You have my data.My data is your data.I fear for my lifeis not just one 4 letter word away fromI fear for my life's data., it requires literacy/biteracy (Call that #Biteracy?).I repeat names too.
I repeat names, too.
#Too #DataToo #NamesToo #NameToo #Names2 #Name2
https://twitter.com/contechtext/status/1477554839416709121
https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101417338619324
https://www.fb.com/prosody/posts/10101417338619324
https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101417338619324?cft[0]=AZVQ6HzKLH_XOkgOr6xyDGsAAOP3i5h9H8ZR3SJ8eTxd5L4L4J-nyJpoasPbiwoxcCHoLxnSrS6v0edz7hWMkwu5GCNZRIpA1szO8PHs0S0FTC_zvsWHG5dDWg_z6FI3tf7gSWSL_7gZoXNRazpZlTvb&tn=%2CO%2CP-R
https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101417338619324?__c...
#Data
Naming, for example, becomes a reality thought experiment of another order.
If we asked people to legally state names for the record at a greater scale.
What if so and so actually said that name?
What if it was okay to name your...?
What if laws had to be made to specify what order of what name was appropriate (instead of selectively applying rules based on opinionated leadership not recorded permanently)?
What if there is a possibility there is/was a net benefit, to naming?
Clearly there are concerns with matter of fact naming being a risk/threat to identity issues that entail and cover deeper respects in US Law. However, that is not specified in any W3.org or Matrix.org documentation/specification. If naming is dictated by rules dealt only by extremes then we have not even talked about starting with naming your parent(s).
Reality in this experiment might start with naming your mom/dad/other being a respect/privilege some manage exceptionally.
We start to begin a narrative about where "privacy/private/public/open" change meaning. We strand together what goes from "private" to "public" and back, turning ("maybe") into a rumor/gossip, to what becomes common knowledge, and then language coming out as a (so far often indeterminable) process of determining linguistic faults, loopholes, and traces of fact in everyday talk about (and reporting memory of) your parent.
Oh and the fact I did not finish writing about...
Before I get to that edit/name/term/item I...
Wait I think I have 300 characters and 5 minutes according to the rules for this edit box, one sec...
Oh wait, your writing on, um, Google+, was not banned you say, you say it was just killed by a CEO?
Who remembers you said?
Oh wait, you mean literally everyones writing is available to Google still (for the "Law"), but you can not read your own Google+? You mean everyone who wrote/spoke there??
You think Google actually deleted Google+ (or maybe G jst did not want to talk about it, but saves it for...?)?
Sorry, just?
"Just"? Are we spelling that word correctly?
What percent of the population knows what it means that Steem is
append-only(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Append-only)? Could the law dignity/dignify that in legal code, or would the CIA/DEA secrets suffer, being forced to remember that too?Are we talking about your mother/father or, er, your motherland/fatherland here?
https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent
https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context
Mirror:
https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101423612740934 (first text location)
https://twitter.com/prosodyContext/status/1485343652213936128 (second edit/mirror)
https://twitter.com/prosodyCONTEXTe/status/1485369740872851462 (third with edits)
Archives:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context
https://perma.cc/G98R-Y6YP
https://perma.cc/G98R-Y6YP?type=image
https://perma.cc/9X92-YGMQ
https://perma.cc/9X92-YGMQ?type=image
https://archive.today/pqkTv / https://archive.is/pqkTv / https://archive.md/pqkTv
https://archive.today/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context / https://archive.today/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent
https://conifer.rhizome.org/037/accounts-wait-did-you-read-that-wath-as-a-49-er-a-51-parcent-from-100-or-from-1-first/20220123193158/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent (feel free to flip through my free/public chat/question history, if you just seek around Rhizome profile at https://conifer.rhizome.org/037, which contains Archive.org / Archive.today / Perma.cc links. I am/my username is a "37" meaning "Witness" ...my full real name is on profile page.)
#DataToo #RecordMeToo #PleaseRecordMeToo #RecordDataToo #PleaseRecordDataToo #SocialMemoryIssue #SocialIssueMemoryIssue #Log
For example, text chat is a great example. Very few people relatively to the general population have experienced stable chats (saved securely as text), in a long-form/long-term manner (like me and others, which is difficult even for experts). I believe StackExchange.com is an exception to the rule, above Matrix.org as an open/public identity server, because while Matrix has proritized Ratchet E2EE libraries, instead Stack has prioritised proof. (Notice I did not say "Blockchain", I said Proof.)
Like StackExchange, public chats being the default, I was text-first/text-only by "default", meaning, copyable text. Same text that US law requires, in writing, which requires, you guessed it, Text.
That requires a different sort of thinking about what recording means. Currently US law has a lot of avoidance of (what I call a
Social-Memory Issue) and antagonism towards that which is making people against the very idea of forcing agents too (and your mom and dad too) to record chats as much as me and StackExchange record every letter, openly/publicly/permanently. Which, again, requires a different degree of thinking/thought than tricking people to say things that you can remember in your own words (which is not the same...), suddenly that does not work in this/ther environment.I began with Yahoo! Chat at chat.yahoo.com. If I could share my AOL AIM logs, I would pay for the Freedom of Information Data Act recovery with my blood (because it is better evidence than a "guessing Op" with a funcopname (or is that your family parent, sounds the same?)). I believe Oath.com has a copy, but for who? I mean, Oath.com has a copy for whom?
Once you talk about your mom/dad does it go away because you asked (at what age, does it matter for reporting your mom/dad too?), is that what Laws would require and for who else would such a Law matter? Is it possible requiring your mom and dad to report to "permanent record" too, is an important matter, even if it is "just a question"?
For hashtags, #DataToo #RecordMeToo #PleaseRecordMeToo #RecordDataToo #PleaseRecordDataToo #SocialMemoryIssue #SocialIssueMemoryIssue #Log ...er #Logy?
My #log has old/past chats: https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent&page=1
https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent&page=2
https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent&page=3
https://conifer.rhizome.org/037/accounts-formulated-with-pnp--p-equals-np/20220108212050/https://chat.stackexchange.com/users/16272/prosody-gabe-vereable-context?tab=recent&page=10
(Sadly, "pagination" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagination#In_web_browsers only works manually, you have to add the "&page=5" by yourself.)
A reading skill to just rememember/excavate.
I put a mirror/copy at https://twitter.com/contechtext/status/1520974267068063744 for the record.
#Log #Memory #Proof #Record #Redundancy #RecordKeeping
Also, well, I put another copy/mirror on https://www.facebook.com/prosody/posts/10101449995399874 too, just for the record.
#Log #Memory #Proof #Record #Redundancy #RecordKeeping
From "&page=1" to "&page=12" so far, hmm. (Every time I chat, you must increment/paginate greater again, til StackExchange implements a "Next page..." button.)
Because of https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/172774/how-do-you-find-out-your-very-first-chat-in-a-particular-chatroom/172777#172777.