Running a bot posting 50 "Great post !" comments daily and auto-upvote all of it is now profitable even for someone having just 30 000 SP )
Before that it would work only for 1+mio SP accounts )
Running a bot posting 50 "Great post !" comments daily and auto-upvote all of it is now profitable even for someone having just 30 000 SP )
Before that it would work only for 1+mio SP accounts )
Easy enough to run counter bots for that. Negative voting would deal with it better though.
A few people started negative voting a few days ago and look at the turmoil )
Can you imagine a few hundred negative voters on duty ?
I think having linear distribution curve we'll just have to accept self-voting.
Personally I don't mind to give it a try, the current system have prooved itself to be not scalable anyway.
Negative voting isn't possible on Steemit. Negative voting involves voting on votes, rather than voting on posts.
I think @svamiva means flagging/downvoting.
Thanks, I see now.
Anyway, even if it would be implemented I doubt that more then just a few people would bother to use it, there are not many people around want-to-be-policeman-for-free
For the largest stakeholders, downvoting some Steem Power to policing bots wouldn't be something they do for free. It would be something they do to help protect their investment.
Ah, back to July then!