It's not just Steemit but every social media campaign thrives on vote buying. What a marketing agency sets up a marketing budget, what do you think the agency spends on. Of course vote buying. It's become a norm in the marketplace. And, when it becomes a norm, it is no more unethical. It's just how the game is played. Unfortunately that's the truth.
So true
Worse still, steemit is not just a social medium. Making vote buying more consequential than ordinary social media
Sure. I can see your point.
We don't have choice, if the rules of the game are like this we have to play it, if we don't play we will never win, I accept the rules and keep playing, I will never give up. ☺
what if the goal isn't to win, but to succeed as a group?
we succeed as a group by having the best content out there, not by individuals 'winning'
and i say buying votes will not get us the best content, but it will get us mediocre content, and even downright garbage, as people continue to 'play the game' without respect to the whole.
There is a position that is healthier than either "I'm here just to make my numbers get bigger" and "you must abdicate your self interest in favor of the group."
And that's to adopt a system which rewards people positively for actually engaging with content that they consider to be quality, whether that is creating it or making sure that someone else who is likely to like it sees it.
It's in my best interest for me to get more content that I like, however that is. It's in your best interest for you to get more content that you like, however that is. Ideally, if we both pursue our best interests, we both get what we want – we both profit.
As the system stands now neither one of us profits by pursuing our best interest. Unless our interest is very narrowly to make our numbers bigger. And our only interest is very narrowly to make our numbers bigger.
I've said it before, and I will inevitably say it again:
You get what you reward.
Steem is set up to reward "playing the game" of making your numbers bigger – and that's it. Observed as a game system, which is really what it is, the current situation of vote buying and influence delegation in order to facilitate evermore vote buying was inevitable. That's what the system is set up to do.
The system rewards acting at certain temporal breakpoints which humans are lousy at doing. The system rewards not caring about content, per se, but only about gaming those upvotes. The system rewards a fixation on chasing the dragon of the most upvotes at the right time.
Because it literally does not reward human interaction in a meaningful way with content. It makes no statement as regards the content of the system. And because the content doesn't matter, the game can be played without reference to content.
And so it is.
The only fix for that is not social. No amount of social influence or interaction can make that change. The only thing that can make that change is a change to the rules of the game so that individual choice makes a difference at an individual level. Individual choices have to empower individual desires.
Until that happens what you can expect to see is what you've already seen.
it may be the norm, but that doesn't mean we should continue doing it.
buying votes is akin to advertising, which in and of itself isn't bad, but it will be used to make ideas seem more valuable than they actually are. this is how walmart, mcdonalds, and microsoft all maintain their market share. (and i would argue their products are less than alternatives and they actually push out alternatives) they use their resources to keep themselves in the limelight, while up-and-comers are overshadowed by the behemoths. i do not see this as a good thing.
let things live or die by their merit alone.
just because it has always been done doesn't mean it should continue.
buying votes is deceitful, nobody likes sellouts (except other sellouts) .. your vote can be delegated to those you trust to vote for you, perhaps, but it should still not be an automatic vote just because you gave me money. that is how united states congress works right now, and corporate interests always have more concentrated wealth to override the individuals.
if vote buying doesn't 'die' it will destroy steemit, because it is only going to get worse. are we really modelling the political world by allowing vote buying?
yes, yes we are...
most people are doing that I think
otherwise it motivate us to earn more steem power and I think steemit is done for that, make people invest and buy steem power or buy upvotes and earn steem power
this is not creating more value, it is a circle jerk that creates 'wealth' but has no value.
we can create good content and at the same time help our selfs that way, we are free to do what we want with the steem that we earn !
no, there is no 'helping our selfs that way' that is good for the economy.
you think you should get paid for doing nothing? what? how is that good for steem? it will destroy it, because it is like a cancer that is not good for the whole.
if it keeps growing, it will kill it.