You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Lessons learned from bot operation during "the whale experiment" and hardfork 18

in #curation • 9 years ago

Although, I think one point of the trending list is to let people monitor for high-value abusive voting before payout. I guess the devs would need to be sure not to give abusive voting/author teams a way to hide their activity.

Now that is a good point 😵 Anyone who disagrees with down voting / flagging to reduce reward payout (there are many) would be tickled by that idea. I hadn't thought of it but yep, it's relevant. But I thought that number of comments and the rep of the commenters had something to do with the trending page too right? Or is it just est. payout?

9 years ago in #curation by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     9 years ago 

    It was commenters too. As demonstrated by @transisto's example, here. Although, I just found this, from @smooth, in that post's comments:

    It's actually not a known "issue", it is intended. The idea being that any high rewards, even buried in comments, would become visible and can be scrutinized by stakeholders for possible downvoting.

    It is being removed because maintaining the tree sum on a blockchain isn't feasible if you don't limit the comment depth.

    so maybe it's just top-level posts now.

    Coin Marketplace

    STEEM 0.09
    TRX 0.30
    JST 0.035
    BTC 110096.92
    ETH 3893.04
    USDT 1.00
    SBD 0.58