You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Curating responsibly

in #curation7 years ago

Wanna get rich on YouTube, post a stupid Cat video and get a billion views. I was hoping for something different here.

In my short time, less than a week; I see two things, a mutual admiration society between insiders/whales who reward each other and their designated favorites, by what appears to be automatic BOT voting?

Secondly I notice attempts to garner good press and favoritism by rewarding known content creators/influencers who might migrate or promote Steemit.

I joined because of Jeff Berwick, The Dollar Vigilante reporting he had made $15,000 in his introduction post. Later he posted about this amazing success in another post and received another $9,000+ pay off or pay day.

His total winnings to date appear to be around $35-$40,000 USD not bad. In fairness, Jeff posts a lot and has some great information on YouTube. He also has some rewards that are low, like a $1.25.

Hopefully I'm 100% wrong.

Sort:  

That was a long time ago, the community has been slowly maturing since the time dollarvigilante joined. You're absolutely right that there's collusive voting, but I have some good news for you. With Hardfork 19, the influence of whales will be diminished by an order of magnitude. Currently, it takes 10,000 minnows to equal a whale. After HF19, it'll be just 100 minnows. So insider/whale/collusive voting will no longer be effective.

Of course, now it's up to the minnows and dolphins to curate responsibly - which is why I made this post.

Also, as Steemit grows and matures, all of this will go away.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 68348.76
ETH 2644.95
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.69