"Full Speech" defined by Annie G. Rogers, Ph.D., a $Psychologist (who wrote in "The Unsayable" about "full speech" but did not use the official/medical/criminal/operative word to describe [...] once in the whole book.).
Why is a text processor not the example like paper is blank as a rule? I mean I really like your bubble design, who/what shows me how that passed the accessibility spec again?
How much time does Mark Z devote to going through the intelligently designed bubbled text, and can either cite a Great Books Program that used that reasoning at the printer, thinking about being a reader, is that helping us read?
Why has the advent of information design changed book format into Pre-K style line spacing, is that wath or do we really call that part math?
"Full Speech" defined by Annie G. Rogers, Ph.D., a $Psychologist (who wrote in "The Unsayable" about "full speech" but did not use the official/medical/criminal/operative word to describe [...] once in the whole book.).
Originally defined by Lacan, a $Psychoanalyst.
"Full Speech" defined by Rogers, Ph.D, a $Psychologist (referencing Lacan, a $Psychoanalyst), in The Unsayable: The Hidden Language of Trauma.
I do not know how we went from
text_linestochat_bubblesreally that is not what I predicted (and we call what/that accessibility?).text_lines -> chat_bubbles = accessibility_specification? (Whatwg!?)Why is a text processor not the example like paper is blank as a rule? I mean I really like your bubble design, who/what shows me how that passed the accessibility spec again?
How much time does Mark Z devote to going through the intelligently designed bubbled text, and can either cite a Great Books Program that used that reasoning at the printer, thinking about being a reader, is that helping us read?
Why has the advent of information design changed book format into Pre-K style line spacing, is that wath or do we really call that part math?