I like that you are using Fibonacci numbers for your MAs. Anything pushed you to decide on that?
I'm currently using the 34, 55, 89 and 233. In the end, I think that the number tagged on a specific MA is more or less irelevant, important is the range of the MA (i.e. the recency of the price action), but then again, if the number is not that well defined, might as well use fib numbers, eh?