Bitcoin and EOS have very different ideology. Bitcoin is made to be sovereign state ristant. No one-not even the miners could block TXs/amounts of bitcoin without splitting the chain. And those are so bad that no one wants them. EOS is made to be an OS of blockchains. Like OS where you can delete what you think is bad-EOS is the same. You feel like deleting bad things when sometimes you realized it was a mistake so you bring it back. EOS is not as decentralization as Bitcoin. Does it need to be? Is the definition of decentralization the same in EOS? NO,No.
What many people see is miner=Bitcoin.
Instead Bitcoin=chaos based system.
With some much chaos to control is to hard..
Bitcoin miner=half of control.
One thing is that miner pool don't equal miners. Think of miners as another asset on bitcoin that votes on Bitcoin Blocks. They delegate their rigs to pools which represent them. If those miners do disagree they can undelagte it. Yes it still bad(FU bitmain) the major pool makes probably hold 40% of the rigs in their pools. However with a now proposal will make force pools to give their power to miners which would give a better representation of who controls what. NO HF needed for this.
Bitcoin node system is also fighting with the miners.
Bitcoin node can declare UASF and UAHF and with the LN nodes will get paid for their service as well.

However i did find this reddit comment on eos interesting and has some backing to it:

What's "great" is that the 21 block producers are all working in background to address this situation. What's not great about that is 21 people are working in a "back room" to figure out what is going on and are going to "take care of it"..."everything is under control." Right now, they control when this chain will be restarted.

Guess what, those BPs are going to start developing relationships with one another, even though these people are supposed to have little in common, due to being globally distributed- thus ostensibly reducing the possibility of collusion. Of course, they have a lot in common now, as big holders of EOS, operators of the network, and recipients of the block rewards. Some of them are going to like each other, while some will not like each other. They will start to clique off into subgroups. And then they may eventually start to disagree with one another (if EOS is lucky). Or, in a possibly worse scenario, they'll all agree with each other, and simply bend things in ways that benefit them. Together, they likely control enough tokens to vote and keep each other in power.

This is how cartels are born. Call it FUD if you want, but it's just a plausible analysis of what could happen, and even sooner than potentially expected. Not all cartels outwardly wear a cartel mask. The rushed nature of EOS deployment could even hasten the development of these types of dynamics (if BPs are constantly working together to solve problems, since block.one has thrown up their hands in a sense).

Block producers of a decentralized blockchain should not have to work together in such ways. It creates an obvious risk of collusion in the operation of the network.

EOS is a major shit in thinking in the crypto world. I don't like it but we also need to see it. EOS is the U.S.A of cryptocurrency. No crypto is fully decentralized bc we are humans but Bitcoin is the most.
EOS needs a lot of prove and it system/governance needs to do better than blocking users. It redemption is apps. If it can prove that then it main selling point is accommodated for real world usage.