RE: DELETED
No apologies necessary. And there's no intention of discrediting you or the project - only constructive criticism. Your enthusiasm level is high and I get all the good intentions, though I've been through alot over the last 15 years so understand where you're coming from and some of the inherent weaknesses in the approach are.
I get your frustrations - and aren't going to try sugar-coat anything when I see they're likely to continue with the approach taken. It seems kinda like you've gotten offended because I haven't hopped on the positivity train off the bat - but your expectations are about as realistic as expecting to sleep with someone halfway through the first date. I don't mean that to put you down in any way - but offer honest, valuable feedback as otherwise you're likely to keep getting frustrated as running in high gear and wondering why no one wants to jump on the wagon before slowing down enough navigate the way through a gentler, paced relationship-building process.
There might indeed be a few people interested in starting from scratch - though you'll attract the right people the further you go in articulating the vision and details, versus such a broadly-sweeping general concept...
Meh this conversation is unproductive. I explained how I felt, private critiscism is professional.
as is transparency in discussions of a "collective" project in a forum where an idea is collectively being developed.
the degree of productivity is dependent on how the feedback is acted upon.
you wanted contribution to your idea - you got it. not in the form of unconditional positivity you wanted. but in honest, authentic, objective feedback. maybe I offered too much too soon when it wasn't asked for, so my bad.
OR on the flip side - it could be a challenge. and rather than getting defensive and shrugging it off, you could use the questions to stimulate an elaboration into the details missing from your first take to clear up the misunderstandings generating the feedback.