Detailed Analysis of Today’s Bitcoin Senate Hearing

in cryptocurrency •  9 months ago

Finally, the much-feared Bitcoin Senate hearing has come and gone.

For those who sold out in anticipation of a true government crackdown on the cryptocurrency market, I have a bridge I’d like to sell ya!

The government, as I suspected, was quite reasonable – well, as reasonable as a nanny-state government can be! Ultimately, they just want to have their cut, and clamp down on truly illegal activities (ie. BitConnect).

Here are some key quotes from today’s Senate hearing (courtesy of TechCrunch, who reported the news), and at the end, I will share my own insights:

The Intrinsic Value of Cryptocurrency

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton stated:

“There are a lot of smart people who think there’s something to the value of cryptocurrency and the international exchange and I’m not seeing those benefits manifesting themselves in the market yet. I look at this from the perspective of main street investors and they should understand that.”

*Note however that his language is open-minded, not draconian or ham-fisted

Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Clayton stated:

“I think our main street investors look at these virtual currency platforms and assume they are regulated in the same way that a stock is regulated and as I said it’s far from that and I think we should address that.”

*Again, we find open-ended language. The SEC might require warnings issued, such as the Surgeon General’s warning on tobacco products, but a full-fledged regulatory imposition is unlikely.

Initial Coin Offerings or ICOs

Clayton responded:

”I believe every ICO I’ve seen is a security… You can call it a coin but if it functions as a security, it is a security…Those who engage in semantic gymnastics or elaborate re-structuring exercises in an effort to avoid having a coin be a security are squarely in the crosshairs of our enforcement provision.”

*Folks, THIS is where the debate about U.S. government oversight on cryptocurrency markets will occur, not on whether or not bitcoin or any other altcoin has the right to exist (they do).

The government’s position is that the ICO, for all intents and purposes, acts like an IPO, but sidestepping the regulations required of IPOs. If the SEC lets ICOs stand as they are, then publicly-traded companies, particularly penny stock companies, will cry bloody murder.

On the other hand, the “people’s position” is that everyone should have the right to take risks if they so choose, and the ICO is no different. Since the IRS defines bitcoin as property, it seems the correlation with IPOs is irrelevant.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the U.S. government is simply not willing to undertake the massive effort (and expense) required to crackdown on bitcoin. The Senate hearing also affirmed that government agencies are intrigued by the blockchain technology, and that they don’t want to stifle innovation.

At the same time, the regulatory bodies have a job to do. They can’t let ponzi schemes like BitConnect run wild, blockchain or no blockchain. So in many respects, we do need some oversight into the actual administration of cryptocurrency markets.

But to what extent are these oversight procedures protecting the American people, and at what point does it cross over into undue and unconstitutional influence? That’s another major debate that’s brewing.

Where we are all encouraged is that the Senate hearing wasn’t the big, bad wolf that most people were afraid of. As I said from the beginning...Just HODL It!

#cryptoupdate #bitcoinsenate #bullishmoney

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

There was recent behind-the-scenes regulations orchestrated to take effect at the same time as the hearing.
LocalBitcoins.com just started forcing users to ID Verify

The market responded well!!!

Regulations are coming whether we like it or not. At least it looks like the SEC is starting to accommodate for the nature of cryptocurrencies, not just ban them outright.

While the hearing could have been a lot worse, I’m afraid that we may be duped. A televised hearing is an opportunity for politicians to show off their skills and “wise demeanor”. These people are actors and can play to the audience. Their true face comes out behind closed doors, far from millions of eyes that can see their deviousness.
Make no mistake, the true mandate of the SEC is to serve Wall Street, not main street. Their very existence is based on legitimizing ways for their masters to fleece the little guy. (Think High Frequency Trading).
Keep a keen eye on what they do, not what they say.
These are the foxes telling the kitchens they are here to help.

The good news is that clearly they don’t have a handle on the crypto space and don’t yet know how to intervene.
The other news that was missed in the euphoria was the head of the BIS (the Central bank of Central Banks), Augustin Carstens, speaking about cryptos:

“Novel technology is not the same as better technology or better economics,” he said. “That is clearly the case with Bitcoin: while perhaps intended as an alternative payment system with no government involvement, it has become a combination of a bubble, a Ponzi scheme and an environmental disaster.”
“Private digital tokens masquerading as currencies must not subvert this trust [in central banks],” he said, before proceeding to layout a “strong case” for banking regulators to place the squeeze on the cryptoasset ecosystem.”

This shows how they really feel. Legacy money does not accept competition.
Stay vigilant!