When Price Passes Practicality

in #crypto6 years ago

future_of_crypto.jpg

With cryptocurrency having soared massively in market capitalization, we should take this lull in the market to reflect on whether the price has outpaced the practical use cases of most cryptocurrencies.

You see, most people criticize me heavily when I bring up their favorite cryptocurrency like IOTA, and ask whether it has users. When I do this, these clowns will often cite some pawn shop in Europe that accepts it for payment. When someone does this, I lose all doubt of their clown membership status, because the question I am posing has nothing to do with, "Does anyone in the world at all use X crypto?" Rather, I am asking a more general investing question of whether a given cryptocurrency has a broad base of users who transact in that crypto to do regular, everyday business, not people speculating in cryptocurrency for investing purposes.

There is a difference between investing transactions, and regular, everyday use of a currency. Certainly a coin can have many speculators flocking to it. Certainly a coin can have many youtube videos made about it. It can get marketed and hyped... but is anyone actually using it for something besides these reasons?

Measuring Usership

When we want to measure whether a currency is used, I am not concerned with number of transactions. After all, we could have a million transactions all totaling up to less than $1 USD. This metric can be useless. Likewise, if we are tallying up test transactions of projects people are working on, or tallying up speculator transactions, I do not care about these either.

The reason we need actual users in the long-run for a cryptocurrency is that when all the speculators dump your favorite cryptocurrency who will be left to buy it?

This is why I want real users. Real users need to buy a cryptocurrency to accomplish something meaningful in the world of cryptocurrency. They will buy a cryptocurrency even if it has fallen out of favor with speculators.

Real Uses that I see in cryptocurrency:

  • Reserve currency for trading other cryptos, used to send funds internationally (bitcoin, USDT)
  • Cryptocurrency used for ICO sales (Ethereum)
  • Possible Future as a International Banking Currency (Ripple)
  • Possible Future as a currency for blockchain apps, and better functionality for the ICO market (EOS)
  • Blogging Social Media Currency / Most User Friendly Currency / Influence Purchasing on Steemit.com / Soon to be the Easiest way to launch an ICO (Steem)
  • Illicit economies using privacy coins (Monero)

The rest of cryptocurrency is based on pipe dreams. Even two of the ones I listed are based on a future hope and expectation which may not happen.

How many ICO's have exclusively launched on NEO? ICO's anyone cares about? Compare that number to the number of ICO's exclusively launched on Ethereum and you will notice the difference. Relatively (relatively means in comparison to Ethereum), NEO has no users. I am not saying NEO has no users, I mean in comparison to Ethereum it has not users.

When the market figures out it is stupid

My Hypothesis:
There is a moment in the future where all the facts that should matter but do not matter, will actually matter. In other words, in the end, the market should eventually reach a state that it cares about how a project is actually doing. At some point, lies posted on a fancy website have to eventually be seen for what they are, marketing deception not based in real-world reality.

Path to market maturity

First, cryptocurrency needs to get out of the diaper stages. From what I listed, there are only five projects presently which have users, and two more that I think could have users within two years.

In some ways, what we are looking at today is like IBM stock in the 60's. It was not until 40 years later did people fully figure out computer tech and build the infrastructure to use it for the internet tech bubble. This maturity cycle should be faster because blockchain tech quickly innovates and it does not require new infrastructure.

What we have not seen is the beginning of the tech bubble in cryptocurrency. We have seen a lot of absolute junk put up into copy-cat projects that mostly all do the same thing bitcoin or ethereum does.

Steemit.com was the only decent, everyday implementation for a cryptocurrency. Everything else is largely too difficult to use for an average person. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, ect. remain geared for technical uses for cryptocurrency.

I personally believe the marketplace should do better at developing real projects and innovating better.

CONCLUSION:

The chaff of the cryptocurrency market will fall by the wayside. 95% of the cryptocurrencies listed are useless for practical purposes and will not play a major role in the marketplace in the distant future. The market does not need 100 bitcoins, we need less than 10. The broadening of the marketplace in crypto needs to be a practical use case differentiation from standard bitcoin copy crypto.

Sort:  

Absolutely agree. I have been considering whether it would be worth doing 2 things. 1st is to actually list the use-cases or niches that crypto can fill and then 2nd classify each crypto in the top 100 to see which crypto does it best.

I think a lot of "investors" in crypto are getting the cart before the horse.

A lot of cryptos have good use cases and ideas, but the dissemination and execution is abysmal. Like BAT, advertising tokens is a good idea, has a use, but is there any market penetration? How is the execution of the platform? This is where many good ideas fail.

It was an amazing year and all your predictions have been achieved.

Shall we stay invested or do you see new targets for them.

It will be great if you can Share your view and coins for 2018 so that we all can benefit :)

NAV Coin: 12x+ Was at .60$ now its 4.2$ (80% Reached)

EOS: 18x+ ($10 target) -- Achieved

Bitcoin: 2.7x ($9,900+ target) -- Achieved

Ethereum: 2x to 3x ($600 to $900) -- Achieved

DASH: 2x+ ($800+ target) -- Achieved

You are awesome and very thoughtful in your coin selection. God bless you.

bat is great, i own some. The need better marketing, a famous celebrity advertising the system. Like Edward Snowden does on behalf of zcash on twitter.

and why do you like monero so much. I think zcoin has better tech...

Do you have ny new targets on NAV n EOS, or some new coin/ico you recommend?

Hey Bugged,

Curious if you had jumped back in after the recent dip? I remember reading your post of how you had exited crypto not long before the market correction earlier this week.

No, though I have been very tempted. I'm just not convinced the selling is done and I'm hoping some of the ponzis bust during the downturn so we can really clean the slate for a longer bull run. Wishful thinking maybe ;)

I don't think even the worst Ponzis will affect the overall market (Bitconnect flirting with $2B cap). Biggest risk entering 2018 may be BTC failing to address the scaling and fee issue before users decide to crown a new blockchain. I really think this could happen unanimously over time..

Good luck. Read your post on potential shift from PoW/DPoS, good stuff.

Thanks. Financially the collapse of ponzis like BitConnect might not dent the market much, but it will affect sentiment. There is a whole breed of speculators who are buying madly in this mania and they need to realise that diligence is required.

When the market wises up it'll see the true gems in the crypto space and maybe throw off the dinosaur BTC and it's ongoing scaling drama.

Well, that's my fantasy anyway :)

You are the only investor on youtube that makes sense of what he says. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree with what you say. I also think that a lot of projects try to implement cryptos where cryptos are actually not needed.

Great article. It's almost certain that 95-99% of the current cryptos out there will not survive long term.

Any thoughts on the tipping point towards mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies as... currencies?

Right now it's simply seen as a speculative investment vehicle and not much else. IMO it won't be seriously used as something to pay for goods and services until:

  1. Major adoption and stabilization
  2. Top companies (Amazon, eBay, etc..) offer it as a mode of payment

It's kind of a catch-22. You can't really have one of these without the other. Here's hoping the tech continues to make progress and attract new people until it can fulfill its vision.

The only place we could even have mainstream adoption is Steemit.com.... but 9 out of 10 people will not want to blog. Blogging is a niche. It's a popular niche, but it's not a mainstream activity, so presently, crypto lacks a vehicle to go mainstream. Apps built on EOS are perhaps the only hope to go mainstream anytime soon. On EOS, app devs could build smart phone apps that use blockchain in new and interesting ways (like Steemit). If that happens we could get something more mainstream.

I find myself agreeing with you about Steem to a certain extent. It's a clear example of blockchain real-world application. I do appreciate that you receive a reward based on actual contribution. Still, I'm wondering if there are cases of groups of people just upvoting each others posts...

Wondering about Bitshares... When governments start cracking down on exchanges, decentralized exchanges will be the only ones left so the need for Bitshares will be great. I'm not aware of any other decentralized exchanges at the moment.

The only problem I've experienced with Bitshares is that the wallet frequently doesn't initialize correctly. I've tried the download executables as well as the browser plugin apps and they both have this problem. That's why I haven't invested in Bitshares yet because I want to know I can always open the wallet when there's an internet connection. I only have success about 1/3 of the time in opening the wallet so it makes me skittish about putting any money in there.

Methinks I have not experienced the abovementioned problem. Been using firefox and https://wallet.bitshares.org . Every now and then syncing would fail temporarily. But then reloading the page always helps.

There are some other DEXs but I'm not sure how well each runs. Bitshares may be the best DEX out there. Only DEX I used was Counterparty, but it was mainly for asset trading. ... I think BlockNet is another DEX, don't quote me on this.

I've been having very similar problems with the clunky BTS wallet. So I thought it was me not being Geek enough to figure it out. Presently have two wallets but it seems to default to one of them and I haven't been able to pry the other one open for maybe five or six weeks now. And there was a couple of months previous to that where I couldn't get into it. Figure that eventually it will be running on EOS type platform.

I checked out Firefox @jerzy's suggestion with Bitshares wallet and it's much more reliable.

Tried that link and it worked! Still somewhat puzzled.

DEX's are clunky yes, I haven't used one I liked. Counterparty DEX was ... okay, but transactions would take minutes since it was BTC blockchain used.

They really have which is a shame I was hoping that cryptos would be able to figure out a way to be able to handle massive transactions by now but that seems like an issue that wont be solved any time soon.

I couldn't agree more, I've had similar thoughts as the total market cap reached ATHs.

If it's too early to invest in the tech and/or if most projects are overvalued/junk, what are your expectations for Institutional money in 2018?

I imagine most institutional money being attracted to blockchain tech that embraces compliance, transparency, and a certain degree of centralization (Ripple seems to fit the bill best here).

Or, perhaps a more decentralized platform whose tech can prove to be an order of magnitude better than what's currently available (DASH/BCH/EOS) and that can safely support the needs of business on the blockchain, part of this is solving for the scaling problems that seems to plague most platforms as they become widely adopted.

Crypto should go higher. So few people are smart enough to actually trade the market on fundementals, they're still reeling over what digital decentralized money means for the future... I expect more interest in crypto in 2018 and people investing into it more.

I now know several every-day people who now want to invest into crypto now that's gone up. Millionaires and billionaires are thinking likewise, the sector will see more money into it. And there is a decent reason for investing into it now, because some projects do have valid and compelling use cases, so they are actually worth something long-run. BTC should keep going higher in 2018, I believe. The rest of crypto will follow, the good, bad and ugly.

people will always criticise until they don't know its potential anyways
I wish you a very Merry Christmas :D keep sharing and inspiring with your work :D

Viable business idea

One needs to read into each company and decide weather it is a viable business idea. Nothing goes up in value unless it provides something in the long run...and Bitcoin provides nothing.

Understanding the Network

They say lightning fast network will fix Bitcoin. Then again lightening fast network will make all go faster by the same coefficient. Now, if there is no logical fundamental reason why anyone should have Bitcoin then it is a mania bubble and one does not want to get caught holding the hot potato. Bitcoin is not producing what is promised. In fact, it is failing dismally. It is slow and expensive to transfer. The only reason why anyone is buying is is because they believe someone else is going to pay more for it than what you bought it for.

Bitcoin provides a common network for payment and trading. It is useful. If I had to send money to China, it's faster to send BTC than wire it there or western union it there. Government and banking financial controls can take days or weeks. BTC is same day. This is what gives it value as a medium of exchange.

It seems to me that BTC at the moment is primarily being used as a purely a investment vehicle to make profits and nothing more. There is nothing wrong with an investment vehicle since there are so many investment vehicles in the fiat world and where there is money made there is attention which is a good thing. I am still ponding whether BTC really need to have practical use like buying starbucks coffee to be great and continue to be great.

BTC is used practically. If you want to trade your favorite low market cap alt-coin, you must buy BTC. You have no choice. Also, plenty of people sending BTC internationally. Chinese for a while were using BTC as a vehicle to get money out of the country. There are other countries with similar issues. Then there is certain cultures where their national currency is junk so some of the money changers will also use some BTC along with USD as currencies that do not depreciate. Also, plenty of drug deals still happen in BTC.

So true. I lived in Asia 15 years ago for a number of years and people then put their money into gold and USD (and real estate in their country) for the exact reasons you enumerated. Now BTC has arisen and it is more practical and easy to use and spend than gold and real estate.

Another crypto that has a product that is already being used in Europe and Asia (Not the US) is TenX (PAY). They have a Crypto debit card that is very useful for international travelers to buy things in different fiat currencies.

Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and Peace on Earth.

I completly agree, different tokens for different contexts, but the unique that looks like a real digital currency and reserve of value is monero.

Balance privacy and transaction privacy is the feature that keep you alive in certaint countries, it isn't just for criminals and illegal activities.

It's 90% criminals and illegal activities. I'm a libertarian, but plenty of libertarians have tin foil hats on. A tin foil hat wont help us with understanding investments, it will just hinder our world view.

Privacy while I like it, and while this may be an attractive feature for .0000001% of the world population, it is not a compelling use case in and of itself. Tracking people would be a more compelling use case for investing because we could get corporations on-board and it would cause the price to skyrocket. Privacy, wont ring the buzzer of most people out there. It's an idealistic goal, not really something the every day person wants to achieve in their life. It's way, way down the list of priorities on the Maslow hierarchy of needs.

Certain countries? Sure I guess. They should just grow some balls and get a better government instead of using passive aggressive, hard to use crypto to do it.

lol hahaha you make me laugh and think at the same time ;)

if you are a libertarian, you should know that government and better/good are the opposite, free market baby!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 59328.31
ETH 2997.26
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.79