I would suggest that the major and biggest problem developers, philosophers, and creative people have to focus on solving in the crypto community is effective governance. This governance cannot be a one sized fits all. It should not be ideologically restricted. It should in my opinion allow the stakeholders to own the concept of crypto and who are the stakeholders?

The actual stakeholders are the people of earth born and not yet born. For this reason the platform must be maximally adaptable. It has to be designed in such a way so that as sentiment changes over time the platform can evolve with it. Bitcoin in my opinion cannot adapt and is extremely rigid in it's ideological base to the point where it might be trapped in a technological tomb. I would hope the next gen platforms do not make the same mistakes else crypto will continue to be banned merely because a few powerful people somewhere disagree with the ideology of the core developers.

The only way to make something immune to being banned is to make it so adaptable that it becomes whatever everyone will like at the time. So yes, I'm perhaps one of the earliest to suggest a data driven sentiment based approach to feature selection. We can have a vision, but the vision we have may be too early for the majority of the world to grasp.