IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF COVID19: The Truth Is Out There (Part 4)

in #covid19last month

 

This in-depth analysis of COVID19 is 19k words and 42 pages long. This PDF is the entire report so it is easier to download and read. I have spent many months working on providing you this analysis. I hope you find it informative and it helps you understand the dangers that are fast approaching all of us. Please send questions or comments to jhann.analysis @ gmail.com, email is also in the PDF. I will try to respond. Thank you.

 

Since Steemit only allows so much text I have split this report into multiple parts.

 

 

 

Alternatives to Vaccines

We need to stop using a one-size fits all approach to healthcare. Each person is unique and needs to be treated as such. What might work for some will not work for others. With all of the allergies people have, why is it ignored that people could be allergic to what is found in the vaccines? Why are doctors and medical professionals with a difference of opinion being vilified and having their licenses pulled for speaking out against the use of vaccines? Why are only those in “authority” positions who hold your biases the only ones you view as correct? Confirmation bias is a logical fallacy. Healthy debate includes all sides of a discussion. Science is a process of discovering the truth and if one side is silenced and censored then it isn’t science but pseudoscience. Fact Checkers, which are used to silence and censor anyone with an opposing view to the government rhetoric being pushed, are the initial stages to Thought Police described in the book 1984.

 

Why spend billions of taxpayer funds on brand-new unproven vaccines when a fraction of that money could have been spent on focusing on non-liability free products that had already been approved by the FDA as being safe for human consumption? Why would we not focus on already approved products that lessen the severity while also providing a natural immunity? “Follow the money” isn’t some crazy crackpot idea. There is no money to be made when the masses understand how to take care of themselves and not rely on big pharma’s liability free products. Products that drive large amounts of adverse events also drive up profits for other medication, like heart medication, that is pushed by these same for-profit pharmaceutical companies that provide the liability free vaccines.

 

With the EUA that the FDA “may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases . . . when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives”. Based on the government website USA Spending as of April 2022 3.63 trillion in taxpayer funds have been spent focusing on the response to COVID19, with none of the funds focusing on alternatives to vaccines, and most of the funds going to special projects, politicians net worth, and the pockets of the politically connected. How much relief did the government send you? Did it really help you? Do you feel it was 3.63 trillion worth? At least 75 politicians owned stock in the pharmaceutical corporations that produced the COVID19 vaccines. Do we really no longer care about conflicts of interest?

 

Many of the below alternatives were being researched early in 2020 with doctors around the world speaking out about the benefits these alternatives produced. The vaccine should never have been mandatory or forced when healthy people have alternatives to the liability free experimental gene therapy vaccines to keep from catching a new variant of the common cold.

 

 

Cannabis

NIH: Cannabidiol Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication and Promotes the Host Innate Immune Response

  • Version 1. bioRxiv. Preprint. 2021 Mar 10. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.432967
  • “Here we report that cannabidiol (CBD), a compound produced by the cannabis plant, inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection. CBD and its metabolite, 7-OH-CBD, but not congeneric cannabinoids, potently block SARS-CoV-2 replication in lung epithelial cells. CBD acts after cellular infection, inhibiting viral gene expression and reversing many effects of SARS-CoV-2 on host gene transcription. CBD induces interferon expression and up-regulates its antiviral signaling pathway.”

NIH: Fighting the storm: could novel anti-TNFα and anti-IL-6 C. sativa cultivars tame cytokine storm in COVID-19?

  • Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Jan 31; 13(2): 1571–1590. Published online 2021 Jan 19. doi: 10.18632/aging.202500
  • “Overall, we are the first to show that application of C. sativa extracts profoundly decreases the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines in human 3D tissues. Still, our study has several pitfalls. Here, we used human 3D full-thickness skin model to analyze the effects of cannabis extracts on inflammation and fibrosis. While it would be important to replicate the data in an airway epithelial and alveolar tissue models, and use either SARS-CoV2 virus or its components to induce inflammation, our data can be used as a roadmap for the future analysis. Moreover, key fundamental mechanisms of inflammation and fibrosis are similar in various tissues, and key roles of TNFα, IL-6 and other interleukins, chemokines, and MMPS have been well-established in an array of fibroproliferative diseases.”

PubMed NIH: Nigella sativa for the treatment of COVID-19: An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial

  • Complement Ther Med. 2021 Sep;61:102769. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102769. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
  • “Effective treatment for Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is under intensive research. Nigella sativa oil (NSO) is a herbal medicine with antiviral and immunomodulatory activities, and has been recommended for the treatment of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of NSO treatment in patients with COVID-19.“
  • “A total of 173 patients were enrolled for RCT. The average age was 36(±11) years, and 53 % of patients were males. The control and NSO groups included 87 and 86 patients respectively. The percentage of recovered patients in NSO group (54[62 %]) was significantly higher than that in the control group (31[36 %]; p = 0.001). The mean duration to recovery was also shorter for patients receiving NSO (10.7 ± 3.2 days) compared with the control group (12.3 ± 2.8 days); p = 0.001.”
  • NSO supplementation was associated with faster recovery of symptoms than usual care alone for patients with mild COVID-19 infection. These potential therapeutic benefits require further exploration with placebo-controlled, double-blinded studies.”

 

 

Hydroxychloroquine

BMJ Journals: Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19

  • Postgrad Med J. 2020 Sep;96(1139):550-555. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137785. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
  • Hydroxychloroquine has shown several antiviral mechanisms, including the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha.”
  • The effect of hydroxychloroquine on SARS-CoV-2 (covid-19) has been studied in vitro, demonstrating its pre-entry result, probably due to the inhibition of the virus ACE2 receptor and the viral inhibition post-entry. Also, in vivo studies have demonstrated clinical improvement and decrease in the viral load.

Science Direct: Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review

  • New Microbes New Infect. 2020 Nov;38:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100776. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
  • HCQ has been shown to have consistent clinical efficacy for COVID-19 when it is provided early in the outpatient setting; in general, it appears to work better the earlier it is provided. Overall, HCQ is effective against COVID-19. There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19. HCQ has also been shown to be safe for the treatment of COVID-19 when responsibly used.

PubMed NIH: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial

  • Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
  • Despite its small sample size, our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.

PubMed NIH: Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Potential Mechanism of Action Against SARS-CoV-2

  • Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2020 Aug 24;1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40495-020-00231-8. Online ahead of print.
  • Out of these drugs, chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have demonstrated positive results indicating a potential antiviral role against SARS-CoV-2. Its mechanism of action (MOA) includes the interference in the endocytic pathway, blockade of sialic acid receptors, restriction of pH mediated spike (S) protein cleavage at the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding site and prevention of cytokine storm.

 

 

Ivermectin

PubMed NIH: A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness

  • Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:214-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.191. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
  • • “The trial included 72 hospitalized patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh, who were assigned to one of three groups: oral ivermectin alone, oral ivermectin in combination with doxycycline, and a placebo control group. Clinical symptoms of fever, cough, and sore throat were comparable among the three groups. Virological clearance was earlier in the 5-day ivermectin treatment arm when compared to the placebo group (9.7 days vs 12.7 days; p = 0.02), but this was not the case for the ivermectin + doxycycline arm (11.5 days; p = 0.27). There were no severe adverse drug events recorded in the study. A 5-day course of ivermectin was found to be safe and effective in treating adult patients with mild COVID-19.

PubMed NIH: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines

  • Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402.
  • Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”

 

 

N-acetylcysteine (NAC)

PubMed NIH: N-Acetylcysteine to Combat COVID-19: An Evidence Review

  • Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020; 16: 1047–1055. Published online 2020 Nov 2. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S273700
  • “N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used in clinical practice to treat critically ill septic patients, and more recently for COVID-19 patients. NAC has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating characteristics that may prove beneficial in the treatment and prevention of SARS-Cov-2.
  • N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is inexpensive, has very low toxicity, has been FDA approved for many years, and has the potential to improve therapeutic strategies for COVID-19. NAC administered intravenously, orally, or inhaled, may suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication and may improve outcomes if used timely. Potential therapeutic benefits of NAC include, extracellularly scavenging ROS radicals, replenishing intracellular GSH, suppression of cytokine storm, and T cell protection, thus mitigating inflammation and tissue injury. NAC administration in combination with other antiviral agents may dramatically reduce hospital admission rate, mechanical ventilation and mortality.

PubMed NIH: Therapeutic blockade of inflammation in severe COVID-19 infection with intravenous N-acetylcysteine

  • Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;219:108544. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108544. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
  • “NAC was also administered to 9 additional respirator-dependent COVID-19-infected patients without G6PD deficiency. NAC elicited clinical improvement and markedly reduced CRP in all patients and ferritin in 9/10 patients. NAC mechanism of action may involve the blockade of viral infection and the ensuing cytokine storm that warrant follow-up confirmatory studies in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

PubMed NIH: Bottom-up analysis of emergent properties of N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant therapy for COVID-19

  • World J Virol. 2021 Mar 25; 10(2): 34–52. Published online 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v10.i2.34
  • “NAC is a long-known antioxidant whose main clinical application is in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Its mucolytic and anti-inflammatory properties make it useful in chronic bronchitis, and its ability to reduce homocysteine levels is of benefit to people with heart disease. Moreover, it helps mitigate the impact of environmental toxins and malignancy by preventing reactive oxygen species overproduction. NAC use has also shown promising results in the treatment of various viral infections. By increasing glutathione levels, it impedes viral replication and decreases viral load. Several studies have illustrated the antiviral activity of NAC against influenza A strains H3N2 and H5N1.

 

 

Vitamin C, D, and Zinc

NIH: Zinc, Vitamin D and Vitamin C: Perspectives for COVID-19 With a Focus on Physical Tissue Barrier Integrity

  • Front Nutr. 2020; 7: 606398. Published online 2020 Dec 7. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.606398
  • Several minerals and vitamins have antioxidant, immunomodulatory and antimicrobial roles which could be helpful for the immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In the absence of a widely available treatment or a vaccine for COVID-19, supplementation of micronutrients emerges as an important measure to improve the immune system and to prevent the development of severe symptoms. Some of these micronutrients are the vitamins A, B, C, D and E, and minerals such as selenium, magnesium, and zinc.”
  • Overall, the medical literature demonstrates that the supplementation with zinc, vitamin C and vitamin D can mitigate viral respiratory infections. Thus, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the supplementation with such nutrients may be characterized as a widely available, safe and low cost measure that can be useful to cope with the increased demand for these nutrients in case of contact with the virus and onset of the immune responses, as well as to lower the risk of severe progression and prognosis of this viral infection.”

NIH: The Role of Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Selenium in Immune System against COVID-19

  • “Low levels of micronutrients have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes during viral infections. Therefore, to maximize the nutritional defense against infections, a daily allowance of vitamins and trace elements for malnourished patients at risk of or diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be beneficial. Recent studies on COVID-19 patients have shown that vitamin D and selenium deficiencies are evident in patients with acute respiratory tract infections. Vitamin D improves the physical barrier against viruses and stimulates the production of antimicrobial peptides. It may prevent cytokine storms by decreasing the production of inflammatory cytokines. Selenium enhances the function of cytotoxic effector cells. Furthermore, selenium is important for maintaining T cell maturation and functions, as well as for T cell-dependent antibody production. Vitamin C is considered an antiviral agent as it increases immunity.
  • “Patients with malnutrition are more likely to be from lower socioeconomic groups; thus, nutrition supplementation is important for the risk group as well as older adults who have a relatively weak immune system. In this review, we focused on the importance of vitamin C, vitamin D, and selenium for immunity enhancement. The immunomodulatory properties and the consequences of deficiencies or supplementation of these micronutrients against viral infectious diseases, including COVID-19, are summarized in Table 1. Since severely ill COVID-19 patients were reported to be deficient in more than one nutrient, we suggest that nutritional deficiencies may favor the onset of COVID-19 and increase the severity of the disease. Combination of some of these micronutrients (vitamin C, vitamin D, and selenium) may help to boost the immune system, prevent virus spread, and reduce the disease progressing to severe stages.

 

 

 

Masks

 

“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave” – Fredrick Douglass

 

Many don’t realize that Industrial Hygienists are the Subject Matter Experts who are capable of assessing physical, chemical, environmental, and biological hazards within a workplace and environment that could lead to injury, illness, or death. They are the specialists around appropriate control mechanisms, administrative controls, and use of Personal Protect Equipment (PPE). These individuals should be the go-to experts that help set policies. Why are some of these experts being ignored and vilified when they speak out against the use of masks for COVID19? Why should we trust career politicians or other government officials who are constantly lying and changing their policies over those who should be considered the true experts?

 

Dr. Stephen Petty, P.E. CIH., C.S.P. of EES Group, Inc., is one such expert in the industrial hygiene field. He holds nine U.S. patents and has written a book “Forensics Engineering: Damage Assessments for Residential and Commercial Structures 2nd Edition”. Dr. Petty has been deposed nearly 100 times and gave court testimony in roughly 20 different trials. His testimony and expertise were critical in having a Kentucky Judge invalidate Governor Bashear’s State of Emergency Actions in June 2021 for private schools. Hierarchy of Controls is used to minimize exposure and infections, with PPE being the least effective option to minimize and control diseases and viruses like COVID19. In a recent podcast, Dr. Petty discussed how to control exposures through proper industry standards. This YouTube video has been continuously removed from YouTube for violating community guidelines because it went against the narrative that face masks actually worked. Dr. Petty has repeatedly explained that respirators are PPE, not masks. Masks have never been respirators and have never been PPE.

 

As I mentioned previously, we have been told by government (link is from State of Illinois Department of Public Health) for over a year that “My mask protects you, your mask protects me”, but this is a fallacious argument for several reasons. PPE is Personal Protective Equipment not Protect Everyone Else Equipment. Masks are PEEE (pun intended) and should be treated as pseudoscience. If the item you are wearing is not protecting yourself then it is not PPE. Even the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA), which has strict requirements for respirators, does not have guidance on masks. This is due to masks not being able to be fit-tested which invalidates masks being effective an any regard and further shows masks are not PPE.

 

Protecting yourself protects society. You are not a risk to society and others if you are not sick. If you are a risk to others because you are sick you are still not responsible for others’ health and no one is responsible for your health. You must take precautions to protect yourself, not others. Not following proper PPE or industry standards can and will increase infection rates. This has been the industry standard for decades and has been proven to be true through many studies. Health is a personal reasonability except for when dealing with children. Are we adults who are capable of taking care of ourselves or are we children in need of being controlled and monitored by a parental figure? Government is not and should never be considered a parental figure though. It is not upon others to protect us and look out for our health, with the exception of someone’s job, e.g. doctor in an ER that you visit, or parental figure over children.

 

A problem with some of the studies the CDC uses as evidence showing the “effectiveness” of the cloth masks fails at addressing real world scenarios. Using a headform and mannequin to simulate a person coughing doesn’t consider things like how people move around, turn their heads, adjust their masks, contaminating masks by touching it, breath in those contaminates, how often the masks are replaced, and the different airflows and pressure in each environment as individuals move through the environment. These laboratory-based experiments do not reflect real-world situations.

 

This CDC study states that you need to wear a mask fitter, over a medical procedure “surgical” mask (different from a cloth mask), to “potentially” increase protection to >= 90% for aerosols ranging in size from 10 um or less. The CDC knows that if they change the range to 5 um or less their statistical models displaying the effectiveness significantly drops in value showing that masks really do not work and are pseudoscience. Lying with statistics is a real thing. Anybody that has taken a course on statistics knows how easy it is to manipulate numbers and get what you need to support your argument. COVID19 is 0.125 um in size, so why does the CDC focus on particulates that range up to 10 um in size? Cloth masks do not stop or slow down COVID19 and from the studies below do not provide any benefit beyond a statistical assumption and modeling that “potentially” there could be some benefit. Math is not science, it is only a tool to help analyze data in the process of discovering the truth. Math and simulations alone are not good science.

 

Next time you are in a store that is handing out surgical masks for COVID19 look at the product box and instructions. You’ll see that the product instructions specifically state that the surgical masks do not offer protection for you or others against COVID19. Why would you keep wearing masks when they do absolutely nothing to help you or others from catching COVID19? Blindly following authority and being a good obedient citizen is the wrong answer. If masks don’t help then what is the real purpose for the government forcing people and businesses to wear them under threat of violence? If a business doesn’t listen and enforce government dictation their business license is revoked and their business is forcibly shut down with the owner being arrested for defying tyranny. I can tell you that being forced to wear a mask is not about your safety nor the safety of others around you.

 

Our lungs are excretory organs and function by pulling clean oxygen into our bodies and dispelling nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and thousands of other potential chemicals that build up in our systems. We should not be breathing in what we exhale. Doing so can lead to respiratory infections like Pneumonia and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), which began to spike during the summer of 2021 when it should have peaked during winter of 2021. If you are using a mask when you exhale or cough the large respiratory droplets get caught in the mask contaminating the mask which you then breathe back in. Small respiratory droplets, the real driver of COVID19, pass through easily and contaminate the environment around you. As you touch surfaces and adjust your mask you contaminate the mask because every place you go is considered a contaminated environment, which you then breath in everything being caught in the mask. It gets even worse when you aren’t replacing your masks every 45 minutes to an hour. You should always assume all environments are considered contaminated unless you are in a clean room that was designated as being sterile, which takes a lot of effort to keep sterile. This is not happening in your home, in your vehicle, nor is it happening in stores you are shopping in.

 

Even surgical masks are only rated to be used during surgery, a sterile environment, and should only be used for 45 minutes before being replaced. In contaminated environments any potential benefit is significantly reduced and requires changing out the mask in shorter intervals. When looking at large datasets, studies have shown no statistical evidence that surgical masks reduce infection rates. Some studies have shown that when taken in small datasets there is a small decrease in infection rates but the statistical advantage goes away as more data is collected indicating that the reduced infection rates might only be a correlation instead of causation.

 

Cloth masks offer significantly lower “protection” than surgical masks in all laboratory studies and simulations. How often do you replace your mask? Are you sure your mask is working as promised? As you inhale with a mask on you are inhaling the contaminates on the mask back into your lungs. This is not appropriate for containing airborne viruses nor is it effective. Masks are not properly rated respirators and do not protect the individual who wears them. Where are all the biohazard bins in stores to dispose of used masks that have been contaminated?

 

As Omicron began to spread, so called “experts” on CNN started to come out saying cloth masks “are little more than facial decorations” and that everyone should switch to N95s, which are respirators. Even N95 respirators are not properly rated to fully protect against COVID19. Why have these media “experts” pushed masks, especially cloth masks, so hard for the past two years to only say they are merely facial decorations now? Why are children, who had the lowest risk to COVID19, still being forced to wear masks at public schools? Could it be that the government is actually pushing to create a delay in children’s education and social evolution possibly making them easier to control as they get older?

 

If masks actually offer no medical benefit, why were masks ever pushed to begin with? Why were medical licenses pulled from doctors and nurses who spoke out against the mask wearing mandates? Why are we still listening to government and health officials who constantly push incorrect standards and practices? Do you really think we only recently discovered the magical properties of cloth in fighting against infectious diseases? Why is cloth not used in any other medical setting? Maybe there is a different purpose in forcing the masses to wear masks?

 

 

Mask Studies

PubMed NIH: Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population

  • PLoS One. 2008 Jul 9;3(7):e2618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618.
  • Masks worn by patients may not offer as great a degree of protection against aerosol transmission.” – COVID19 is transmitted through small respiratory droplets, aerosol particulates.

PubMed NIH: A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

  • BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 22;5(4):e006577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577.
  • “This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.

PubMed NIH: Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery

  • Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD002929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub3.
  • “Surgical face masks were originally developed to contain and filter droplets containing microorganisms expelled from the mouth and nasopharynx of healthcare workers during surgery, thereby providing protection for the patient. However, there are several ways in which surgical face masks could potentially contribute to contamination of the surgical wound, e.g. by incorrect wear or by leaking air from the side of the mask due to poor string tension.
  • “We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials. We identified no new trials for this latest update.”

PubMed NIH: Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure

  • J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 May;27(3):352-357. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.42. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
  • “We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials. We identified no new trials for this latest update.”

PubMed NIH: Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review

  • BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5):e002553. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002553.
  • “The COVID-19 pandemic has led to critical shortages of medical-grade PPE. Alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. More robust evidence is required on different types of medical-grade facial protection.” – Cloth masks are not rated against COVID19 nor does it offer medical-grade protection.

PubMed NIH: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses

  • Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.
  • “We included nine trials (of which eight were cluster-RCTs) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness (two trials with healthcare workers and seven in the community). There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.18. There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.26; 6 trials; 3005 participants).”
  • “The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.” – cloth masks are worse.

 

 

 

Conclusion

Nothing in the thousands of years of history dealing with government shows us that we should blindly trust what they tell us; the government and its agents are not here to protect and serve us. Government, historically, has always led to tyranny. It was true thousands of years ago when Plato explained the lifecycle of government and it still holds true today. We should be challenging and standing against government overreach and tyrannical actions at every step or the future will be filled with nothing but tyranny for our children and their children. Is that what you really want? Are you really that scared from the 24/7/365 government propaganda being pushed that you are willing to accept tyranny for the long term? Without stepping up and speaking out this tyranny will only grow roots, dig itself deeper, and spread to a level we have never witnessed or experienced in the recorded history of humanity.

 

A dangerous and slippery slope of actions have begun that will only lead to economic disasters that will cost millions, potentially billions, of lives. Do you think that maybe that is exactly the goal by those dictating our lives through global policies and coordination efforts by the political rulers and wealthy elites? How often do you hear these same individuals speaking on the burden that overpopulation is causing?

 

Government lied about lockdowns being only for two weeks. Government lied about the number of vaccine doses you would need to get to return to normalcy. Government lied about masks and their benefits. Government lied about the origin of COVID19 and not being involved with the gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. Government lies constantly without concern of accountability or facing criminal convictions. Trillions have been handed over to a select few while the economies around the world have started to collapse. Massive food, water, and energy shortages are just around the corner and will only make things worse.

 

Is this the new normal you really want? We are responsible for our own health, our own actions. We are not responsible for others’ health and actions. We should focus on protecting ourselves not accepting government rhetoric at face value in the hope the government will take care of us because we can’t. Government is not a parental figure taking care of children. It is a tool or action of control. It is controlling the masses through a monopoly on violence, lies, and intimidation. If we are being controlled then we are slaves to this tyrannical system forced upon us. Only standing up for our rights and the rights of the innocent people around us is how we enact real change. The issues we are in cannot be voted away or solved through a corrupt system that was created to keep us in control. You cannot vote your way to freedom.

 

Repeatedly injecting ourselves with liability free experiment gene therapy medical procedures, while eating McDonalds or other processed fast foods, is not a standard for health anyone should follow. Strong immune systems are our best protection against diseases and infections, which many government measures and restrictions, e.g. forcing gyms to close or require vaccines to work out in a gym, will weaken our immune systems. If you read through this entire analysis and still think vaccines are your best option forward in protecting your health then that is your decision to make and no one should vilify you for making that decision. It is your health and your life on the line, you are responsible for it, only you should be making these decisions. The same goes for those who choose not to get vaccinated or get any booster shots. No one should vilify them for deciding to protect themselves in the way they think is best.

 

Nothing about our future looks bright and things will only get worse. We are allowing it to happen by going along with tyranny and not speaking out against the atrocities being committed around the world and here in the U.S. 2022 will be worse than 2020 and 2021 combined. I feel sad for my children and the innocent people around the world who will not understand the freedom I grew up with. That experience is all but gone as we head into the future with Big Brother always watching and at our side, controlling our every move. Welcome to the new Age of Tyranny.



 

My name is Jeffrey Hann and I'm an anarchist/voluntarist, Army veteran, business analyst, graphics and website designer, and content creator. I have a passion for truth and being logical, which eventually lead me to anarchism. I strive to live my life through voluntary actions and valuing rights. I own Journalistic Revolution (Facebook|Instagram) and I can be found on Twitter|Instagram|Minds|Steemit|Keybase

 

If you enjoy my work please think about donating crypto:

  • BTC address - 12TLd1xnRXSQZnVfMG8WRUNNF9k4YoKDsc
  • ETH address - 0x589BA5535D507999c1413871390554225ae775F6
  • CRO address (Cronos network) - 0x28a8e48679666d26e86382062C28A44c56b96dcf

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.07
JST 0.031
BTC 20836.34
ETH 1189.56
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.27