Free speech is very important. My point is that there is a difference between articulating what you wish people would do and shaming people. When one shames others they take a stance of being someone of authority to judge others. When I said you have no right to tell people what they should or should not do, which is a common phrase, it indicates that you are a person with an opinion, but not having authority. I merely am pointing out that you have no authority or right to authority over how people use their accounts.

For example:

I don't wish anyone ill will who resteems this junk or writes resteem. I just want you to think that it may not be the best way to use Steem.

This sentence brings out a much different response from me than the one below. I care about quality content reaching the top, if you did not use shaming tactics, I might have shared your view somewhat.

To anyone upvoting or especially resteeming this for 1 Steem: You should be ashamed of yourselves and reflect on how your actions are harmful for the community.

This is not you simply exercising your right of free expression, its the act of shaming. You have attached your own code of ethics to Steem's upvote button, which is fine for you, but you are not anyone's authority figure here. The whole point of POB was to decentralize the voting process, not centralize it under the mentality of a certain demographic on Steem.

I respect your right to upvote what you want and I suppose even downvote what you dislike. As for the rest of us, we did not buy SP so that we would be told how to use it. I will use any account I own however I so wish.

Now, if you happened to use a different approach, you might very well have my support. For example, I feel too many of the same people keep ending up on Trending and I would like to see diversity there. If you tried to make a cultural move (via positive encouragement, not shaming) for people to find and devote their upvotes toward quality content producers with reputations below 60, I would support that.