RE: September 11, 2001: This Post Will Likely Show You How Little You Actually Know About The 9/11 Attacks... SERIOUSLY...
Excellent post - some of this I knew but some just as theories. You have provided a detailed analysis and it will take me some time to work through it all. I need to refrain from commenting in-depth at this time as there are a number things that I have not heard before. It would be helpful if you added links at the bottom of the post so that people can easily read your reference materials.
I do believe that aircraft drones were used as replacements for the actual flights that hit the twin towers and the pentagon. If it was an A3 then it had to have been structurally re-enforced for it to not break up as it did its 500 knot loop and nosedive into the pentagon. I am surprised that they would use such an old plane and not a more recent one which would more closely resemble the real plane.
What created the round exit hole in the C-Ring if the A3 was blown up just before impact? The hole seems to suggest that something (maybe a missile/drone) pierced through to the C-ring.
Once in position the official wargames were called off and the drone A3-Skywarrior continued its path towards the Pentagon as if it were flight 77
My understanding was the wargames were called off after the pentagon was hit and after Shanksville? That's what the film 'The New Pearl Harbor' stated. In the grand scheme of things I don't think that is overly important and it certainly doesn't trouble me.
How much of this post can you prove and how much of it is theory based on your research and the connecting of dots? My question is not designed to cast doubt over this post but rather to help me gain a better understanding of how you have arrived at these conclusions?
A short explanation is fine for now but if you wanted to expand on it further that might be best done in a new post?
Thanks for taking the time to write this article. I learned some new things which is great. Following you.
I'll do my best to answer your questions below.
It would be helpful if you added links at the bottom of the post so that people can easily read your reference materials.
I am sure it would be but this is data I have collected for over a 10+ year period of time and I don't have a reference list readily available (and don't feel like spending countless hours to find them all for other people who aren't willing to do the digging themselves).
If it was an A3 then it had to have been structurally re-enforced for it to not break up as it did its 500 knot loop and nosedive into the pentagon.
It was traveling slightly slower then that but you are still somewhat correct, and it may very well of had a few custom refinements/reinforcements done prior to the operation to ensure the drone aircraft would hold up better under the more extreme conditions it would be put through.
I am surprised that they would use such an old plane and not a more recent one which would more closely resemble the real plane.
They used an older aircraft such as the A3 due to it being a retired aircraft (no one to miss it once gone). If they used a currently active aircraft instead it would of been much harder to explain away where it went (you can't just make an active military aircraft vanish without raising a lot of questions as to where it went). Also they didn't need the A3 to resemble the expected aircraft (Boeing 757) since the majority of people would never see it, due to the decoy 737 which was the main focal point for those nearby the crash site at the time (the road directly beside the pentagon was already partially shutdown prior to the attack taking place, which caused most onlookers to be to the north of the impact point, which would of made the decoy fly directly over them, making it stand out much more then the A3 which was far smaller, traveling quite a bit faster, and was approaching further south where there were less eyes to see it).
What created the round exit hole in the C-Ring if the A3 was blown up just before impact? The hole seems to suggest that something (maybe a missile/drone) pierced through to the C-ring.
I can't say for sure, but it appears to likely of been caused by a thermobaric missile which would of been mounted below the A3 and launched just prior to impact with the exterior wall (just after the internal explosives were set off, and just before the A3 detonated itself).
My understanding was the wargames were called off after the pentagon was hit and after Shanksville?
Close, they were called off shortly after the 2nd WTC attack took place, but before the Shanksville crash or pentagon impact took place. During this time substitute drone aircraft had already swapped into Flight 93 and Flight 77s simulated flight paths so that they could take over the expected flight paths after the false radar blips were removed and continue their specific approach as if they were the expected aircraft.
How much of this post can you prove and how much of it is theory based on your research and the connecting of dots?
You can make up your own mind about this, but I think you will find it is far more based on fact then speculation.
Anyways, hope this helps.
Oh and as an added note, if you start to REALLY dig into the 9/11 black op you will likely be just as surprised as I was to find the US NAVYs fingerprints are found throughout every single aspect of that days events (as to be completely honest the Navy was the last place I expected to look, but maybe that is exactly why it was used so heavily... It isn't very expected).
Thanks for answering my questions budz. It makes sense. I'll take a closer look. Cheers.