No but there are videos, the emissions are very clean, in fact one video I saw measured the emissions to be cleaner than the air going into the intake. It appears to use considerably less petroleum ect than a normal gas engine. I think you originally meant the hydrogen fuel cells which are different to geet and use electrolysis to separate the hydrogen though it's possible there is a viable way of doing this economically.... Do you think it is possible that oil companies would prevent people from exploring "free" energy alternatives?
The laws of physics prevent people from creating free energy alternatives. I have studied this GEET engine theory, the exhaust from a lawnmower is just not going to turn anything into plasma and if it did it would not create a strong enough current for electrolysis or to "crack the molecules". That guys molecules were cracked. Think about it, if plasma was splitting molecules into their component atoms why wouldn't the fuel burn up right there? why would it even make it to the combustion chamber? what will happen when you pour cold water in there?
Its a compelling theory because it is sciencey. There are plasma garbage incinerators:
They produce little or no excess energy though and the units are massive. The advantage is they allow the incineration of hazardous and other difficult types of waste.
If you want a free energy generator build a regular gasifier, you can use pretty much any dry biomass as fuel, wood or coconut husks for example. Its a tried and true technology and you can easily convert an automobile or electric generator. It's "free energy" assuming you can get wood chips or other biomass for free.
perhaps it doesn't combust before the combustion chamber due to the vacuum, if you heat wood in a vacuum it doesn't combust and at high temperature would also apparently break up into its separate elements. I actually stated in the post that in the eyes of classical physics the process appears impossible, but I will choose to remain open minded with the knowledge that anything that goes contrary to accepted facts within academia is ignored and essentially swept under the rug in favor of dogmatic theories. None of us actually know anything, we think we experience a material world of matter yet the closer we look the more we realise existence takes place in a singular unified field, one immaterial source energy.. It's bizarre.
the gasifier heats up wood or other material so that it releases its hydrocarbons in an anoxic environment. The laws of physics at least in regards to the GEET engine and "free energy" are fairly straight forward, you can't run a lawnmower or a generator off of water. You can run an engine briefly or poorly on watered down gas. The reason no one is running their car or powering their house with a GEET engine anywhere in the world is that it cannot be done, not as a result of any sort of conspiracy.
Did you read about the plasma waste disposal and how it does not create much if any net energy?
The post was aimed at highlighting that there is a long list of people exploring alternative "free" energy sources who have seemingly met government interest and interference. The deeper we dig the longer the list becomes. Tesla seemed fairly adamant on harnessing ambient electromagnetic energies, and indeed the very substance of the universe and matter is one unified electronic field, classical physics becomes obsolete when we delve into what the world and existence itself is actually made of. Slightly off topic but I'm completely down with the theory that the sun is electrical as opposed to a big ball of fire, I think it's a shame that our minds have been closed by science dogma.
The sun is not a big ball of fire, it's a large nuclear reaction it has electric and magnetic forces involved. The guy who invented the GEET engine died of old age didn't he?
It's very a very appealing prospect, getting free energy. That's how you know that if any of these things actually worked the government or whoever would not be able to suppress them. If you could make a water engine like the guy in the video said, your own homemade Mr. Fusion at garage tolerances, then everyone would be doing that. Everybody in Alaska would have converted their generators long ago.
The laws of physics preclude free energy and perpetual motion machines.
Wood gasifiers are real so you can find all sorts of people using them for all sorts of things.
Tesla was using the earth to transmit electricity, not generate it.
When I say a big ball of fire in the sky I mean I prefer the theory that the sun is electrical and not a nuclear furnace, you quite simply cannot state what the sun is with such certainty, we don't know.
If it was possible to build a multi-million dollar business from scratch then everyone would be doing it, wouldn't they?
The laws of classical physics only apply to how the world appears on the surface, and we are still making discoveries that seemingly contradict previous theories.
Yes wood is a good fuel and a non-pollutant.
Tesla wanted to extract energy from the ionosphere and provide free and wireless energy, his funding was pulled.
Coldfusion appears to open us to the possibility of "free" energy.
"you quite simply cannot state what the sun is with such certainty, we don't know."
Yeah we do, we know in detail the various nuclear reactions that occur in the sun.
If it was possible to build a multi-million dollar business from scratch then everyone would be doing it, wouldn't they?
No, most people are far too lazy and/or stupid and lack the self confidence to do it. It's quite possible if that is your goal and you are willing and able to work for it. The richest guys I know started with nothing.
The laws of classical physics only apply to how the world appears on the surface, and we are still making discoveries that seemingly contradict previous theories.
Yes, sometimes theories of physics are contradicted, the laws of physics, like conservation of energy, are never contradicted.
Burning wood puts a lot of particulates into the air but it is carbon neutral.
No, Tesla wanted to transmit electricity wirelessly and he was able to do so, he harnessed the power of Niagara falls, hydroelectric was the source. The problem with wireless transmission is that you could not meter it, you are basically broadcasting electricity, anyone could receive it. Obviously that is not a sound business plan and that's why his funding was pulled. Fun fact about Tesla, since he owned the patent on AC he was receiving a royalty of $1 for each kilowatt hour of AC power. He choose to give up his royalty because otherwise AC electricity would have been too expensive for mass adoption.
Cold fusion is a technology that is always 10 years away.
Plasma gasification
Plasma gasification is an extreme thermal process using plasma which converts organic matter into a syngas (synthesis gas) which is primarily made up of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. A plasma torch powered by an electric arc, is used to ionize gas and catalyze organic matter into syngas with slag remaining as a byproduct. It is used commercially as a form of waste treatment and has been tested for the gasification of municipal solid waste, biomass, industrial waste, hazardous waste, and solid hydrocarbons, such as coal, oil sands, petcoke and oil shale.
The laws of physics prevent people from creating free energy alternatives. I have studied this GEET engine theory, the exhaust from a lawnmower is just not going to turn anything into plasma and if it did it would not create a strong enough current for electrolysis or to "crack the molecules". That guys molecules were cracked. Think about it, if plasma was splitting molecules into their component atoms why wouldn't the fuel burn up right there? why would it even make it to the combustion chamber? what will happen when you pour cold water in there?
Its a compelling theory because it is sciencey. There are plasma garbage incinerators:
They produce little or no excess energy though and the units are massive. The advantage is they allow the incineration of hazardous and other difficult types of waste.
If you want a free energy generator build a regular gasifier, you can use pretty much any dry biomass as fuel, wood or coconut husks for example. Its a tried and true technology and you can easily convert an automobile or electric generator. It's "free energy" assuming you can get wood chips or other biomass for free.
Plasma gasification
Plasma gasification is an extreme thermal process using plasma which converts organic matter into a syngas (synthesis gas) which is primarily made up of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. A plasma torch powered by an electric arc, is used to ionize gas and catalyze organic matter into syngas with slag remaining as a byproduct. It is used commercially as a form of waste treatment and has been tested for the gasification of municipal solid waste, biomass, industrial waste, hazardous waste, and solid hydrocarbons, such as coal, oil sands, petcoke and oil shale.
No but there are videos, the emissions are very clean, in fact one video I saw measured the emissions to be cleaner than the air going into the intake. It appears to use considerably less petroleum ect than a normal gas engine. I think you originally meant the hydrogen fuel cells which are different to geet and use electrolysis to separate the hydrogen though it's possible there is a viable way of doing this economically.... Do you think it is possible that oil companies would prevent people from exploring "free" energy alternatives?
The laws of physics prevent people from creating free energy alternatives. I have studied this GEET engine theory, the exhaust from a lawnmower is just not going to turn anything into plasma and if it did it would not create a strong enough current for electrolysis or to "crack the molecules". That guys molecules were cracked. Think about it, if plasma was splitting molecules into their component atoms why wouldn't the fuel burn up right there? why would it even make it to the combustion chamber? what will happen when you pour cold water in there?
Its a compelling theory because it is sciencey. There are plasma garbage incinerators:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_gasification
They produce little or no excess energy though and the units are massive. The advantage is they allow the incineration of hazardous and other difficult types of waste.
http://www.floridatrend.com/article/7294/incinerating-garbage-the-high-tech-way
If you want a free energy generator build a regular gasifier, you can use pretty much any dry biomass as fuel, wood or coconut husks for example. Its a tried and true technology and you can easily convert an automobile or electric generator. It's "free energy" assuming you can get wood chips or other biomass for free.
perhaps it doesn't combust before the combustion chamber due to the vacuum, if you heat wood in a vacuum it doesn't combust and at high temperature would also apparently break up into its separate elements. I actually stated in the post that in the eyes of classical physics the process appears impossible, but I will choose to remain open minded with the knowledge that anything that goes contrary to accepted facts within academia is ignored and essentially swept under the rug in favor of dogmatic theories. None of us actually know anything, we think we experience a material world of matter yet the closer we look the more we realise existence takes place in a singular unified field, one immaterial source energy.. It's bizarre.
the gasifier heats up wood or other material so that it releases its hydrocarbons in an anoxic environment. The laws of physics at least in regards to the GEET engine and "free energy" are fairly straight forward, you can't run a lawnmower or a generator off of water. You can run an engine briefly or poorly on watered down gas. The reason no one is running their car or powering their house with a GEET engine anywhere in the world is that it cannot be done, not as a result of any sort of conspiracy.
Did you read about the plasma waste disposal and how it does not create much if any net energy?
The post was aimed at highlighting that there is a long list of people exploring alternative "free" energy sources who have seemingly met government interest and interference. The deeper we dig the longer the list becomes. Tesla seemed fairly adamant on harnessing ambient electromagnetic energies, and indeed the very substance of the universe and matter is one unified electronic field, classical physics becomes obsolete when we delve into what the world and existence itself is actually made of. Slightly off topic but I'm completely down with the theory that the sun is electrical as opposed to a big ball of fire, I think it's a shame that our minds have been closed by science dogma.
The sun is not a big ball of fire, it's a large nuclear reaction it has electric and magnetic forces involved. The guy who invented the GEET engine died of old age didn't he?
It's very a very appealing prospect, getting free energy. That's how you know that if any of these things actually worked the government or whoever would not be able to suppress them. If you could make a water engine like the guy in the video said, your own homemade Mr. Fusion at garage tolerances, then everyone would be doing that. Everybody in Alaska would have converted their generators long ago.
The laws of physics preclude free energy and perpetual motion machines.
Wood gasifiers are real so you can find all sorts of people using them for all sorts of things.
Tesla was using the earth to transmit electricity, not generate it.
When I say a big ball of fire in the sky I mean I prefer the theory that the sun is electrical and not a nuclear furnace, you quite simply cannot state what the sun is with such certainty, we don't know.
If it was possible to build a multi-million dollar business from scratch then everyone would be doing it, wouldn't they?
The laws of classical physics only apply to how the world appears on the surface, and we are still making discoveries that seemingly contradict previous theories.
Yes wood is a good fuel and a non-pollutant.
Tesla wanted to extract energy from the ionosphere and provide free and wireless energy, his funding was pulled.
Coldfusion appears to open us to the possibility of "free" energy.
Yeah we do, we know in detail the various nuclear reactions that occur in the sun.
No, most people are far too lazy and/or stupid and lack the self confidence to do it. It's quite possible if that is your goal and you are willing and able to work for it. The richest guys I know started with nothing.
Yes, sometimes theories of physics are contradicted, the laws of physics, like conservation of energy, are never contradicted.
Burning wood puts a lot of particulates into the air but it is carbon neutral.
No, Tesla wanted to transmit electricity wirelessly and he was able to do so, he harnessed the power of Niagara falls, hydroelectric was the source. The problem with wireless transmission is that you could not meter it, you are basically broadcasting electricity, anyone could receive it. Obviously that is not a sound business plan and that's why his funding was pulled. Fun fact about Tesla, since he owned the patent on AC he was receiving a royalty of $1 for each kilowatt hour of AC power. He choose to give up his royalty because otherwise AC electricity would have been too expensive for mass adoption.
Cold fusion is a technology that is always 10 years away.
Plasma gasification
Plasma gasification is an extreme thermal process using plasma which converts organic matter into a syngas (synthesis gas) which is primarily made up of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. A plasma torch powered by an electric arc, is used to ionize gas and catalyze organic matter into syngas with slag remaining as a byproduct. It is used commercially as a form of waste treatment and has been tested for the gasification of municipal solid waste, biomass, industrial waste, hazardous waste, and solid hydrocarbons, such as coal, oil sands, petcoke and oil shale.
The laws of physics prevent people from creating free energy alternatives. I have studied this GEET engine theory, the exhaust from a lawnmower is just not going to turn anything into plasma and if it did it would not create a strong enough current for electrolysis or to "crack the molecules". That guys molecules were cracked. Think about it, if plasma was splitting molecules into their component atoms why wouldn't the fuel burn up right there? why would it even make it to the combustion chamber? what will happen when you pour cold water in there?
Its a compelling theory because it is sciencey. There are plasma garbage incinerators:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_gasification
They produce little or no excess energy though and the units are massive. The advantage is they allow the incineration of hazardous and other difficult types of waste.
http://www.floridatrend.com/article/7294/incinerating-garbage-the-high-tech-way
If you want a free energy generator build a regular gasifier, you can use pretty much any dry biomass as fuel, wood or coconut husks for example. Its a tried and true technology and you can easily convert an automobile or electric generator. It's "free energy" assuming you can get wood chips or other biomass for free.
Plasma gasification
Plasma gasification is an extreme thermal process using plasma which converts organic matter into a syngas (synthesis gas) which is primarily made up of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. A plasma torch powered by an electric arc, is used to ionize gas and catalyze organic matter into syngas with slag remaining as a byproduct. It is used commercially as a form of waste treatment and has been tested for the gasification of municipal solid waste, biomass, industrial waste, hazardous waste, and solid hydrocarbons, such as coal, oil sands, petcoke and oil shale.