On 9/11, Why Were Flight 11 & 175 Mentioned As Being 757's (when official story is they were 767's), And Why Was Flight 77 Thought To Be A Fighter Jet (official story is it was a 757)?

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks we were officially told that 2 Boeing 767's (flight 11 & 175) crashed into both the North and South towers, and that 2 Boeing 757's (flight 93 & 77) crashed in Shanksville and into the Pentagon. With that said, are people aware that on 9/11 a variety of different aircraft types were mentioned during that days attacks?

On 9/11 NEADS (the Northeast Air Defense Sector) refer to both flight 11 and flight 175 over their radio transmissions multiple times as being 757 aircraft (when the official story is they were 767 aircraft). In fact, listening to their transmissions from during that days events, they appear to not even once refer to flight 11 or 175 as their supposed actual aircraft types (767) and continue to refer to them as 757's throughout all of the various conversations during the event.

9/11 The Lost Tapes full documentary - September 11 2001 NEADS NORAD FAA TAPES
Example: 15:02- "American 11, ah 757, possible hijack."

Then you have the pentagon aircraft (flight 77), which is said to of been a 757. The issue is the entire time the aircraft was being monitored by air traffic controllers that day, they were all convinced it had to be a fighter jet due to its speed and maneuverability that it was displaying, including its final high-speed cork-screw dive, leveling off on an even level supposedly just feet off the ground before impacting the bottom floors of the building. The fact that this aircraft was basically wrote-off as being a fighter jet during the event, and the fact that it did a maneuver that a 757 could not do, leaves a lot of questions as to how accurate the official accounts of that day really are.

"The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane"

Sidenote: On top of that a black box which is said to of been from flight 77 which was discovered days after the attacks took place shows the flight as coming in from a slightly different angle then the official flight path (came in more from the NW instead of the West), was traveling at a higher altitude then the official story says (several hundred feet above the ground instead of ~1 foot off the ground), was traveling a fair bit slower upon impact then we were told (~345MPH instead of ~530MPH) and the entire black box records cut off randomly 8 seconds before reaching the actual building.

So what are your thoughts? Do you think the official 9/11 story holds water, or are you one of the many people who still has a lot of questions and concerns about what really happened that day? And before you answer that question you may like to know that the head chairman of the 9/11 commission himself has openly stated that he doesn't believe the 9/11 commission report that he himself help create.

Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission
https://www.amazon.com/Without-Precedent-Inside-Story-Commission/dp/0307276635

"The 9/11 Commission now admits that the official evidence they were given was far from the truth"
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/sep/12/911thebigcoverup

"The 9/11 Commission was set up to fail"
https://www.amazon.ca/Without-Precedent-Inside-Story-Commission/dp/0307276635

Anyways, share your thoughts in the comments below!

---

ASK QUESTIONS, DEMAND ANSWERS and NEVER FORGET!