An Introduction To Common Law

Were going to cover republic vs. democracy and how it affects your sovereignty as an individual.  First, let’s talk about the system that we are currently in.  When the founding fathers put together this constitution they were up to their eye balls in abuses.  They saw the murders, they saw the robberies and so on that was done by the English military.  They would see how the military would just move into someone else’s home just because they wanted it.  So, our framers put together a system that would endure and preserve your freedoms.  So, they said look… we are self governing.  And what self governing means is that you tell yourself what to do and that you are not governed by anybody, you are governed by yourselves.  The only limitation of your self government that you cannot get away with is if you conduct yourself in such a way that it encroaches on the sovereignty of someone else.  And as long as you stay within that limitation, you mind your own business and they mind their own business which is the general theme.  But, they also recognized that there were a few power structures out there they had to contend with. There was France; Spain, Mexico, and many others, and all of them would love to take over the United States.  Of course it wasn’t known as the United States, but nevertheless they would like to take them over.  So, in order to have a force that would meet their force, they put together this government.  And, the idea there was to make a government that would protect its people from the outside world while at the same time having no authority to deal with the people themselves.  We the people had common law, and common law worked well, and everyone knew it.  As a matter of fact there was an ad out there that states he had a real problem prosecuting people, because at night they were running around screwing up the town, and then during the day they were sitting in grand juries.  And another problem is that everyone in the United States was a lawyer.  So, more law books were sold here in America then in the British island because we as people in America took this idea of law very seriously.  We knew the kinds of people that were running the system and the people for the most part knew the kinds of people that were running the system.  We understood the common law.  And, that was hard to deal with for the bureaucrats so after the constitution was put together, they managed to sneak through our 14th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment created a new class of human being called “citizen of the United States.”  And, it clearly states that if you were born in the United States, you are now naturalized and subject to the jurisdiction, you are a citizen of the United States.  You can be born in America, naturalized but not a subject, so what would you be then?  You’d be one of the people because the people own the government, and the government owns the citizens.  Then in the 1850’s they not only took over peoples homes but they also took over a school system.  It was the first idea of mandatory school system, and there were other public schools systems for people already, but they had to make it mandatory.  But, not for everybody because most of people still lived in small towns where farmers and people would get together and hire a teacher, but the government couldn’t stand all that education.  So what they did was create their public school systems and it was populated under military supervision.  Their parents did now want them to go to THAT kind of school so parents forced the issue that this was not the kind of place they wanted their children to be brought up in and it was very illegal what they were doing here, but when we are talking about raw powers of the authorities of military, it became fairly hard to resist.
 

And why was this so important to the government?  Because once they got in command of the schools and setting their curriculum, and from the 1850’s to about the 1950’s they phased out the subject of civics, and replaced it with a new subject called American Government or Social Studies.  So, when you and I went to school, we learned about the American Government.  And when you look at civics, what is civics?  Civics is that actual branch of government that deals with personal rights.  So, you drop civics and bring in that branch of philosophy that deals with only American Government, and you get a people that are no longer knowledgeable about their rights anymore, because people have slowly been commercialized into really not ever learning their rights.
 

Someone once told me that the most important subjects in school, or to be educated on are civics and communications, because if you don’t know your rights and you don’t know how to speak about those rights, then how are you going to be able to protect the rest?  And if you don’t have a good handle on the English language, you’ve got a problem, because how are you going to speak up about those rights you have and protect the rights if you can’t figure out how to go about speaking about those things.
 

Some things like this I believe are dormant in people and need to be awakened from time to time, because they initially know they have rights, and can feel they do in their hearts, but some people don’t know where to begin when dealing with the issues that life carries over on a person and works them into someone that are not.  I believe it is very illegal what the government is doing to people and people need to be aware of those things, when they do happen, and more often then not they are happening a lot more these days.  Powerful criminals have been getting away with it for years, you don’t think they will just once day say sorry and stop from doing bad things to people, do you?  They never will.
 

So you’ve got to learn how to spell, how to write and how to read, and you’ve got to learn how to separate propaganda from facts and how to find it so that you can re-write it, you have to separate facts from lies, valid thinking.. valid behaviors and so on, such as with goes in the study of English, the study of communications and the study of personal rights.  From there once you do have your full capability to communicate with others and to know your rights, from there is where everything else we do comes into play.
 

You can do what you choose to do once you have those two things under control.  What would you do if you didn’t have those rights, or you didn’t know those rights, or you didn’t share with others about those rights because you couldn’t communicate about those rights?  So it doesn’t matter how much English words you know if you don’t know your rights, because you can’t communicate about something you don’t know about and if you can’t communicate, but you know those rights, then you have no voice and you can’t speak them, you can only feel them and don’t know what to do with them, so it’s important to have both civics and communications within education, as without the two, you get a cluster-fuck about what your rights are, and you can’t speak out about something you have no idea about, because you aren’t being taught them in the public school system, because their people just don’t want there to be well educated well versed people in the world who are ready to stand up on their rights and who want to take their sovereignty back and not be subjected to their maritime admiralty laws when they aren’t helping you or your families, and your families for the most part are blind by what you talk about because they haven’t been taught the same things that you now know… they’ve been following the decrees of this social suicide of a government that is hell bent on making people dumb so they can keep on taking your stuff and taking your lives away from you.  Let’s just say they like to keep truth and prosperity in life far away from you, the citizens because you are not one of them, and you are not a people.  You are instead a corporation and a corporation has certain responsibilities that you don’t really know about either because from one city to the next they change, from one state to the next they change and obviously from one country to the next, there are vast differences.
 

There is nothing more fearful then ignorance in action.  And there are judges in the world that really have a lot of power and no education, so people are left with this horse shit system that doesn’t allow a people to even have rights let alone stand on their rights.  Because these judges are acting in admiralty law that makes citizens as slaves and regular people left alone.  If you’re not a “regular person” like they are then you are subject to a lot of fines and court costs and cops pulling you over, and it’s not like they had to do this, but they did do this, and they’ve been getting away with it for a long time, because people ultimately aren’t even taught what their rights are, let alone how to go about communicating with their top dogs that are completely brainwashed into a system that isn’t allowing a people to have any rights at all while making sure other people get a free pass so-to-speak.  They get to do whatever they want!
 

When you go to school you are raised on two of the three English languages; the first one is slang, the second one is Modern English, and the third you don’t learn because they want to create confusion so they can get away with whatever law they want to create over a people and get it to where it’d be illegal to many things that a person might like to do or even need to do in order to get by.  But, the third language they don’t teach is Legal English, or Legalese.  It’s made so that when you or I walk into a court system they get to let the presumptions lie on behalf of you the people, when you are the sovereigns and in a real legal system your government is supposed to work in your favor and you create the laws, they don’t create the laws over you because you are no longer a citizen, you are the sovereign because you are the person, and not how they define person, but you are a people.    
 

You are all human beings and you all have rights.  And you have to be able to do the math in common law.  The whole statutory law is lined up against you and if you have any cracks in your law, they are going to find that crack and run right in and stomp out your every chance of succeeding in life.  They don’t want you to succeed.  They don’t want you to be able to think these things through, and with common law you’ve got to have a reasoning process and you’ve got to be able to think things through.  And so you get into language and dictionaries and you will realize that we speak three different languages, just within the English language in America.
 

Wise men are instructed by reason; Men of less understanding, by experience; The most ignorant, by necessity; The beast by nature. That was in Letters to Atticus, Cicero
 

Language and dictionaries: Which language do you speak? There is people language, and there is citizen language?  Which one are you? Bill of Rights All rights are available to the People of the United States But only some rights are granted as privileges to Citizens of the United States of America.
 

They will ask you what language you speak.  And when you go into the public school system you are being taught up to a point the language that we speak, but you aren’t taught the legal system, or this legalese so people leave school with misconceptions and they leave school and go out into the world that way, with misconceptions of this legal system.  And, judges; when you walk in front of a judge and you say something and you mis-state it, it makes a judge carry misconceptions because you are going to bring in contradicting things into the court system without even knowing it, so you create a little confusion.  So the judge is going to look at you and when a judge is left with some conflicting thoughts, he’s going to make some choices and as long as there is confusion there, he’s going to use discretion.  And we all know where that goes, because in their many laws, they get to do whatever and pull whatever rug over your eyes as long as you don’t speak the language they speak, they are going to leave you with more misconceptions and more confusion and you leave the courts with more confusion and more misguided misconceptions, so there are a people that are left without justice while there are a people that are still working you over.
 

So when a person calls themselves a sovereign citizen, both of those words contradict each other because sovereign means the law maker or master, and citizen means slave.  So which are you a master; or a slave?  And when you call yourself a sovereign citizen you are really calling yourself a master slave.  So, I don’t recommend using the term sovereign citizen, but rather just knowing that you are a sovereign.  All people are sovereigns.  All the people are born with free and inherent rights endowed to them by our framers of the constitution and the Bill of Rights.
 

So when you walk into a court system and you don’t know these rights and don’t know the language they will try to use to pull the rug over your eyes, you are walking into a court system and the ball is always going to be left in your future wages, loss of jobs, etc… etc…  because they aren’t working for the citizens they are working for the Sovereignty.  And all courts are sovereign courts but the lower level courts are just sabotaging people through their legalese while people don’t know this stuff, only because they aren’t taught civics at all.  They are taught how to be citizens, but aren’t taught that they are sovereigns.  They aren’t taught about the rights that are inherent given to us by our creators, nor even natural law within common law, which is the law of the land, and was the common law of the land before this dumbied up system just took care of itself with all of its dumbied up people willing to take FIAT in turn for messing up peoples lives worse then they were before they stepped in it; meanwhile still calling themselves as this benefit to humanity.  While for some, I can see how it could seem that way, but for some I can see where they feel deteriorated by a system that is not teaching you civics and civil matters and aren’t teaching you these things because you are meant to be slaves and not know that you are even a slave at all.  This is how people walk into a court system and sabotage their sovereign position because they don’t know how to word things and end up saying things that contradict what you are saying and you end up not being a sovereign but a citizen.
 

A citizen is a publicly owned slave and a sovereign is a master.  The constitution says if you are born and naturalized and subject to their jurisdiction, but it doesn’t matter what jurisdiction you are in, people are not subject.  Because to be subject to anything you have to be a citizen, THAT means you are a slave, and to be a People you are not subject to anything.  You are a sovereign, and in other words YOU make the laws, and what YOU say goes so long as it doesn’t infringe upon the rights of another.  There is not authority of the government to do anything with the People at all.  The People ordained this constitution and established this constitution for whom?  For those guys over there!  They call themselves the United States of America, it is the world’s smallest country about ten miles square and sits in Washington D.C.  But what they don’t tell you is that they are a corporation.  You, if you are a citizen are just like a corporation and your birth certificate acts like your receipt for the bankers who then get to collect on your consent to being a citizen, but you don’t have to consent and you have that right.  Although that is what they are working on taking away from you the people, you the People have to get just as deviant as they are in your thoughts and know that they are working it out to where you don’t have any freedoms and you won’t see any freedoms ever if you let them, because they will take away your every right to thrive in this country, as what we are witnessing all over America today, this global take over of mans rights and against what allows a man to be free. The United States have no jurisdiction other then the consent that you the sovereign gives them, because the citizens don’t know they are sovereign which is how they get to manipulate peoples rights into privileges and so on and so forth.  The actual country of the United States of America is a tiny country in comparison to the United States because it’s actually located in the District of Columbia.  It’s actually a very large country in terms of how many people it employs and how much expense is required to keep the country going in a positive direction.  So, the People ordained this constitution for the people of the United States of America, the corporation.  That is how it read in the preamble of the constitution, so the preamble, when something becomes ordained or established, there was nothing there before the sovereign to start placing illegal fictions over another person until something has been ordained and established, and in order for you to ordain something or establish something it has to be consented to and written down, and if you don’t consent to their ordinances and their establishments, you do not belong to its decrees.  So when they created this thing, the people were sovereign before they created this thing, but even now after they created this thing, the people are still sovereign because the word, “ordain” means, to authorize, and to establish means to put it down on paper, or to write it.  So if you ordain something or authorize it, and then you create it or write it down, where do you see it in there that you gave up your authority, or your sovereignty?  You are above whatever you created, or you are above whatever you authorize.  The slave cannot turn around and take over the master because our salve is called the government, because they are there to serve us, and it says so right in the preamble.    
 

Okay so there are also two separate categories of law, and it can be broken down into two separate categories.  On the one side you have common law, the law of the people, or the law of you and me, it’s not the laws that are written down, it’s the laws on how you think it should be, because common law basically refers to whatever you can convince a jury of.  When you do a law suite, you decide what the jury is, and that jury is subject to your law.  So when you write your laws, you can write them and say the law states as follows, or that you declare the law to be as follows:  And then write your law.    
 

 i.e. (I declare the law as follows; anyone who runs around screwing up peoples lives for FIAT currency is a fraud and anyone that does will be held accountable for their actions taken against a person or a people for their own inherent goals to make more FIAT currency in doing so.)  I think it should be illegal for a people to get away with that.  I think it should be illegal for a people to work out real education out of the schools systems and replace it with a form of dictatorship where they get to train people into becoming idiots and not knowing their rights and then leave with the confusion that is left when they get out into the real world, they aren’t prepared for the real world.  Not even close!
 

How likely is it that I’d have a jury in that courtroom that is in my favor?  Probably unlikely, because the system doesn’t represent anyone well unless it wants to or feels like being a nice guy.  But, that doesn’t mean I’ve given up.  I’m ready to prosecute and personally judge every last one of them and they aren’t going to take any of it, because they are criminals running in the color of law, but aren’t the law.  They are this fictional law, and people just don’t know it because they aren’t taught this.  They are taught this new way of thinking without all the guts that of a true and free nation, independent from a self serving government.    
 

It’s very similar to what the state does.  Take a regular traffic ticket for an example; the state accuses, the state prosecutes, the state judges and the state executes the judgment.  And because they’ve taken away the jail time, because of infraction, and there is no jail time associated with infractions.  Because they call it infractions they like to make it a civil matter, they want to say it’s quasi-criminal but, it’s not… it’s civil and there’s no jury allowed in their court systems so, that’s how they pull that rug over on people, because they get people knowing that they can’t have any more people other then the state there to represent you.
 

So, you see, as a sovereign that’s all that you would do too, you would write laws and prosecute and carry out the execution if necessary, because people are ultimately knowing that they carry out laws every day, or they conduct their lives in a lawful way or unlawful way based on their decisions as to what they feel is lawful and/or legal over their lives.  People, basically give themselves their own set of laws and will either abide by their own laws, or they won’t.  But, most people genuinely want to abide by their laws of physics, their laws of gravity and not test laws of science in such a way that would destroy themselves or others.  While, there are all kinds of people in the world, I find there are more people that genuinely wanted for a better life that they could believe in; and then hand it down to the next generations to make a better world, and a safer place for everyone… but then there are people that just sabotage that at every level in life, and if you’re not careful enough you will fall asleep at the wheel and what takes over is unreal.  You become trapped in the dogma of some other mans dream and goals he’s got written over you and less and less who you wanted to become.    
 

The judge will start to judge you by all the facts that you brought to the table but are also held accountable to uphold the law.  Sure, their was a people that were in my presence who left me with more debt and less ability to pay this so-called FIAT currency debt, and were conducting their jobs in a sort of way as to make more FIAT currency themselves in doing so, and yes… it sabotaged your job and took away your rights as a people and placed you in place of a citizen placing you with illegal debt that was created before you were ever born.  But, your law is no good according to the jury.
 

The founding fathers had a belief and a faith in people, and yeah a few people here and there might have a crazy idea on what the law should be, but if you’ve got someone inside of the world that has a crazy idea, you have a jury that levels out all the crazy from the world and levels out all that madness.  You ever try to get 12 people to agree on something?  It’s not such an easy thing to do.  This is why there is so far less madness today then any other time in history because we have such amazing people from all over the world and no one is doing anything wrong or hurting anyone else for their own power.  They had a belief that if you made this common law the most used law of the land and the highest law of the land, that you wouldn’t have these issues I was just lying to you about.  And this is where people should look at their 7th amendment within the constitution because it says it right there that any decision reviewed by a jury is not made in any court.  The Supreme Court can second guess the jury.  And that is the primary legal system.  There is only one problem with it, and that is, that it puts the power into the hands of the people, the juries and that’s painful to bureaucrats because they can’t stand it.  So the statutory law is the law of the special interests, and the common law is the law of the people.    
 

The statutory law is a law that is written, and it has an authoritative force that goes along with it, while common law is whatever it is that we say it is… because that’s all that people are doing.  Custom usage is very stable in this country and people have a very unique way of doing things, and for the most part people are fairly stable in what they know of law and what they are doing to protect themselves from it and for it, because sometimes the law isn’t doing what is right by you, the people that it was instituted to protect and isn’t caring about what it is willing to subject you as citizens, or slaves of the state and end up taking more from you then you bargained for.  That is not why law is here, and that is not why law was created.  Law was created to protect the innocent and jail the perpetrators of fraudulent behaviors and criminal activities that lead to harm other people.  Which is the people that run this show over a peoples lives and not the people with the same hearts as you, but people that would cover-up crimes and history in order to protect their friends and criminal buddies.  Common Law is a great way to stabilize society while if you want to destabilize the economy and society introduce law with special interests throw out the common law and go with the statutes and ordinances that murder a peoples ability to thrive and don’t see anyone’s true grievances.  We’ll see how fast a dictatorship shows up, and this is how democracy looks like.  Because if they can write anything they want into statues and ordinances and use them without regards to the people, you know someone that is rich enough is going to come along and try to bribe somebody into it, I think they call that lobbying right?  And so, that’s one of the main problems with this statutory system.
 

There are two great area’s of law, there’s the common law; which are your natural laws, and then there are everything else.  Everything else must be written.  The constitution says here are the things that you can do, and here are the things that you can’t do.  The state constitution is written the same way – here’s what you can do, and here’s what you can’t do.  And what do we mean when we say the state?  We are referring to the group of people, the organization of people who call themselves the state.  The whole idea of having a constitution was to place a fence around these guys and contain them.  The constitution was not written for you or me, it was written for them.  It states, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
 

In order to establish this long list of tasks, the United States declared this to be made for the United States of America, meaning the corporation of the United States of America.  The United States is different from the United States of America.  The United States is the states united, and the United States of America is the Corporation that’s located in this plot of land called The District of Columbia.  That Corporation is a public trust if you want to get technical it’s not even a real country, it’s a business.  The states are countries, and every state in the Union is a country in it of itself.  So how can you tell the difference between a state and a corporation?  It’s easy.  All corporations have a president, a secretary and a treasurer.  Does the United States have a president, secretary and treasury?  Yes.  And, they are appointed but the president is elected, and the rest are appointed with the approval of congress.  So the United States of America is just a corporation and all corporations are trusts.  Usually when you think of a trust you think of a corporate trust, or a state trust, but there are many kinds of trusts.  And a trust will have a trustee, and trustor, and a beneficiary and has description of the authority of the trustee.  We the people are the trustors, in order to accomplish their tasks and this list of jobs.
 

So we have a corporation here, a trust, with a list of things that it can and cannot do.  A specific list to follow although you get to the ninth amendment, and it states that just because all of this is listed here, doesn’t mean that everything is listed.  But it basically says that everything that is not stated here is not grated to the state but, reserved for the people.  And, that is a very important piece of information because if your job is not listed here, then you can’t assume it.  And now they assume a lot of jobs and that’s a problem because it reserves them the ability to ignore the constitution or work around the constitution whenever it can.  And they aren’t authorized in doing so.  The United States of America has no sovereignty.  The state of California has no sovereignty.  The state of Minnesota or Minnesota itself doesn’t have sovereignty.  The sovereignty is within the people and it even says that within the penile code, and if you read the government code it specifically states that the sovereignty is in the people.  Government code section 11120 and section 54950 states very clearly, “the people of the states do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.”  You can use that one in court.  They don’t teach you this in school systems because they don’t want you to know that THAT judge is YOUR agent and HE works for YOU and NOT the CORPORATION nor the BANKSTERS of this Corporate Trust Located in The District of Columbia.   
 

That judge is my agent and until I grant him the authority to push me around, he has no authority.  And, I know that is theory but in actual practice we got a problem there.  But, you’ve got to remember a lot of people when they push a law suite in court a lot of people talk tough, but when you get to court – you had better throw that toughness out and here’s why…  Because when you go to court and you bring your case in there, you have no guns to back it up, and you have no power.  You may have legal power but you don’t have any physical power.  You can go all the way through and get a judge that is in your favor, but how are you going to enforce it?  And the only way you’re going to enforce it, is if you can get the people under control who you are trying to get under control.  So, it doesn’t matter what your judgment is because you don’t have any internal support for your judgment.  And what I mean by this is that you don’t have people that are in there on your side that are going to be pushing for you to make sure that your case works, they are all ready and willing to find any reason to place you in contempt of court or contempt of law.  I can only tell you that you have got to be a nice person in court if you want to get out without harm, because they are willing and ready to harm anyone with more fee’s fines and costs and other things that can eat up your time in life, and if you’re just that bad they might even serve you a life sentence and charges that you’ll never pay because the money won’t ever exist.  No one is going to support you if they don’t like you, so it’s always best to remain on your best behaviors in court.    
 

If you’re the type of person that likes to go around and create enemies, you’re most likely the guy that will walk into court scowling at the clerk and the officer and the judge, and more then likely aren’t going to get your way in court because they simply just don’t like you, which is wrong in it of itself to think that likeability has something to do with how you are treated in a courtroom but there is a lot of truth behind it when it comes to bias people to a situation.  Weather or not it be someone that has studied your case and looked over your case before even seeing who you were, goes to show a picture to the judge that might not be so good before you get to the judge, so it’s best to be on your best behavior, simply for the fact that the judge might like you and might go more lenient on you or your case if you present yourself in such a way that makes you a likeable guy.
 

Every-time you walk into a courtroom you should have a new face and show no contention in your voice that coins your depression about the situation.  It is what it is, and the world is not giving people justice, but what are you going to do about it?  Getting mad is only going to fuel their fire, and their fire is what counts against your future earnings, even when they are the ones taking it away from you.  It’s best to just be on your best behavior, and try to stay out of harms way.  It’s always good to carry a friendly face, not just in court, but in real life as well.  A lot of people will help a person out if they have a friendly attitude towards others and a peaceful grace about them.  And I know a lot of people that have been through tremendous pain in life, so I know what is at stake when you are walking into the court system.  But be nice to your enemies, because your enemies are sometimes people that would never really want to cause you harm, they just do what they think is best and sometimes there is a difference of opinion, but opinion is not fact, it is opinion and people are allowed to have their opinions about things.    
 

The whole system that is in favor of itself and thinks it can write up any law it wants to over a citizen and give other people free reign over that law is just possessing powers of evil and allowing those evil powers to manifest and then grow.  These people literally live off of making sure that you aren’t awake enough and that you are just dumb enough to accept whatever they want to throw at you.  There is a lot of different forms of law; there is The Roman civil law system, also known as statutes, and you have maritime law, admiralty law, the law of merchant, and now they have coded merchant law into Uniform Commercial Code or UCC Merchant Code.  That is really the law of the merchants.
 

I’m going to hang you on your own words.  The people are the sovereigns, and the people created the constitution, right?  Then you have the congress and the congress is controlled by the constitution.  And congress passes all these rules and one of these rules was called admiralty.  So no matter which way you slice it, the admiralty draws its authority from the congress, and the congress draws its authority from the constitution, which then draws its authority from the people.  And the issue here is that I’m one of those people and I have no direct control over those admiralty people.  They have the authority that we have delegated to them.  And they have the provision where they can bring the common law in.  So here we have a structure that is the People, then the Constitution, then the Congress, Admiralty Law and then Common Law underneath that.  The fact is that, they have all the authority in the world except for one.  And that is that they have no direct authority over that.   
 

In the other branch you have the People, and you stay outside of the Constitution and you create your own court.  And, just like they have in their own capacity to create their own courts, you do the same in defense against them; you create your own court and law, and in fact there is a rule that says the very essence of sovereignty is that the sovereign creates the law decrees the law.  So, you create the law if you are a sovereign.  So here you are; you’re the sovereign, you create your own court, you create your own law, and one of the things that you can ask for or order, is to use Common Law.  And you can use Common Law so long as it is not repugnant to their statutes, so you have one form of governing over here where you have all these branches of government before it comes to the Common Law, and then you have just Common Law or Natural Law.  In other words, they want you to believe those statutes and ordinances are above Common Law, and if you go down that line of thought, that is what you end up with.  And, you can turn it around on the clerk and tell them that because you are the sovereign that you can declare that you can use their statutory law as long as it’s not repugnant to the Common Law or the Natural Law.  As a sovereign through your own personal authority you can reverse those two positions because you ultimately have the rights and if your government is abusing you through these commercial codes and structures and know it, you don’t have to keep taking whatever they want to give a people and pull the fuck you rug over your eyes.  You don’t have to keep taking their lies and schemes over your livelihood, because even through the pain and struggle you shouldn’t have to listen to all their garbage and take all their commercial debt, because you are not meant to be a slave, you were meant to be free, and a free people would never consent to it, if they knew the truth on how this stuff actually worked out, because it for the most part is defaming a lot of people through the use of psychological damage it creates and the physical pain that comes with it.  At this point in court you get to ask them, would you like to have common law over here on this branch or would you like to have common law over here by the sovereign because common law supersedes all statutory law if you know your rights, you would know that you are the sovereign and you would know that you were being worked over if you still believe that you are a citizen, or a free citizen, as citizen means slave, what that would make you is a free slave.  Because they don’t want the slaves to all know they are slaves now or there would be a civil war before morning and people would be super mad!  And it makes the judges who are stuck in Admiralty Law get really mad and upset when you point out the fact that you are the sovereign and that you have a problem with how they are running their very court system  when its not in your favor and highly always seemingly against your favor, because the system needs people dumb enough to believe they are citizens of the United States of America or weather or not you are a sovereign that lives in the United States.  People are above the Constitution because people created the Constitution as a set of instructions for these people to follow, and you’ve got to remember, the Constitution does not grant any rights to the people, and if you read it, you will see that it was set up as frame work for how the government was supposed to conduct themselves and proceed because they were creating all this havoc on peoples lives, and they knew it, and they knew it themselves, and the people know it, and it’s just seemingly a huge fraud over the people.  Like Lord Of The Flies.  The Constitution recognized the rights, but doesn’t give you your rights, you give yourself rights and you conduct your life in a certain way that follows your rights.  That constitution is important, but it’s for them, not us… and since it’s not for us, it’s for them.  So people create their own court system, and even a strong legal family system.
 

When you walk into a court room you are the sovereign and that court is a sovereign’s court.  So, it’s up to you if you want to let that judge sit up on your chair because this is your court which means that everything in that court is made for your defense, not your furthering mistreatment of your legality, or your rights.  Because the court system doesn’t hold your standards in their law of court, it only holds whatever standards they are feeling up for at the time, and for the most part it takes a lot of peoples FIAT away from them and future earnings of any more of their FIAT fake money.  You see, so the plaintiff is the supreme power in that courtroom because it was created for you by the framers who represented to educate you.  So the clerk will ask everyone around them if they are okay with allowing Common Law into the court when really, they don’t have the say… YOU DO.  You’re the plaintiff, you ARE the sovereign and that is a sovereign’s court.  The government really has no right in doing anything to anybody until the people give them the authority to do so.  And, how do they get their order?  By filing a case.   
 

And what you do and how you say it is by telling the court that this is a court of record, and not a court of law or anything else because court was originally a court of record for the people that we could have on earth and not for the people that we don’t or people that have been wiped off the face of the map.  But, none the less, that is what you are making is a record.    
 

Court of Record is a very important topic too because court of record states a certain criteria that the courts must follow and those are:  it keeps a record of all the proceedings the tribunal is independent of the magistrate or judge that they must proceed according to Common Law it reserves the power to fine or imprison for contempt and generally has a seal  Note that the judge is NOT the tribunal and the tribunal is either the sovereign themselves representing on behalf of themselves, or they are a fully powered jury that is not paid for by the government.
 

Any real court is the court of record and will operate as a court of record, but you’ve seen how these courts are operating today, they are operating in horrible manners and with no regard for the people that it serves at all.  So out of ignorance they want you to conduct yourselves in that fashion because you are not in a court of ignorance you are in a court of admiralty law, or some other punched out scheme on some hidden agenda.  Either way, they are forging the fact that their legal system was made for the people, and that was for all people, not just Americans, but for anyone that legally comes here and wants to help Americans better the world.  But, what we see today is the complete opposite of that Common Law or Natural Law because their admiralty law is so much more important then how it affects your livelihood or even your ability to perform work, psychologically damage you, the whole nine yards happen and they stem from the abuses that go along with admiralty law, and how a people get to corrupt another people through forms of data mining and other social aspects of our worlds technologies.  Some people just study law over the internet, some people study admiralty law, while some people just study.
 

If you know Court of Record you know that it can overthrow the constitution and can overthrow admiralty law and can overthrow even the judge because the tribunal cannot be a judge or magistrate, it has to be someone else who is on their payroll, but ultimately cannot make any decisions.  Because you are the sovereign and you decree what that law is, and if they don’t like it, you can always get a jury that can sit there in judgment of your law.  So a lot of times people can do that, they tell a judge that they are not the tribunal who gets to make the orders and then they make the issues that vacate the judge’s orders.  It’s not easy but it is all cut and dry, because they are all words, words that have been perverted by legalese and trickery getting people to subject themselves to further mistreatment based on the fact that they don’t like to fuck with these people, so just say yes sir, and no sir, and take whatever that comes, and pay whatever they ask you to pay and give them your home and car and everything you’ve worked hard for if they ask you for it, just let them rape you, but just don’t go tell anyone about it now either, we wouldn’t want the rest of the people to know how they are getting butt fucked by their uncle chuck while some pop-corn Hollywood show is doing some kiddy porn on a silver screen… who cares?    
 

“If you make yourself sheep, the wolves will eat you.”  -Benjamin Franklin My Mission is showing people truth and empowers officials and governments to obey or follow their own laws.  If you take an oath of office, why not back it up with some of your actions.  Make yourselves accountable…  Otherwise, some of us are literally slaves, and other people are just comfortable ones.  Slavery is this open air prison system!
 

So, what is a court?  A court is a plaintiff in the suit of the sovereign.  And you know some of these court clerks will stab you in the back the first chance they get, so it’s always good to present yourself in the utmost manners to gain yourself respect of the people within the court.  When someone wants to stab you in the back, don’t let that affect your demeanor because when you can tolerate a clerk that is trying to stab you in the back and bring them the proof of what you’re telling them to be true, they have no jurisdiction over you, and they know it.  They will try to trick you into having all the jurisdiction over you they need to stab you in the back but you as a sovereign don’t let them, and you show them that you’re not backing down from the fight.  After all, this fight is their fight any ways, not your fight.    
 

Judicial notice is when they will take and consider something as fact and evidence they need to use in order to make a decision in your case.  A lot of cases foresee any judicial decisions to be made in your favor.
 

Judicial Cognizance is; the term given to the information that a judge must act on regardless of the fact that it is not proved in evidence.
 

When a person states they are a person of whatever city or state they live, the most important piece of information you gave them is that you are a sovereign.  When you say you are a person you put the judge below you, and if you don’t own the outfit, they have to prove through the courts that you are not.  You automatically place yourself as the sovereign in their courts and placed the judge below you.  You’re automatically in charge and you own the outfit, and if you don’t own the outfit the load is on them to prove you’re not the sovereign.  So you own the outfit by stating you are one of the people.  People don’t yield their sovereignty to the agencies they are serving.    
 

The next thing you say is, and in this court of record complains of… and what is a court of record?  A court of record is common law and the tribunal magistrate, in other words that judge can’t say boo about anything you are doing to work the legal system to work in your favor and not against it, and if he does he is out of line.    
 

You don’t have to say that you are a sovereign, or that you have God on your side, because all you have to say is that you are one of the people and that in this court of record because a court of record is a Common Law court and a sovereigns court and has to represent you as the sovereign and not the citizen slave that it wants you to represent. An attorney at law is an appointee as an attorney who is educated in Common Law, and when it comes to the ways the courts are operating these days it’s hard to find anyone that is well versed in Common Law, which is sad because it’s the Law of the People.  Common Law is not case law, case law is what they teach you in school but case law is not even a percentage of Common Law.    
 

You slide right over that and you are the plaintiff, and they are the defendant and in a counter law suite you are the counter defendant and they are the counter plaintiff.  And the issue is jurisdiction.  Because when you challenge jurisdiction, what they are supposed to do is stop everything right there and prove the jurisdiction to you, and that they never can they always rely on assuming that the placement was correct and even had it not been what they do and how they go about doing it is what is illegal and action that is taken against you by the courts systems and by the police systems.  But, they don’t want to tell you that because I assure you that if everyone knew that there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning and people would be furious.  They don’t have proper jurisdiction over you or the courts when you are one of the people because they simply don’t care.  They don’t even consider that they are belittling your life, and more then likely when they work one over on hundreds of people every day, I’m sure they sleep just fine at night while you sit there and struggle in yours.  They don’t know how to prove jurisdiction over the courts and they never have and never do, because the courts belong to the people and not the people racking up their admiralty law damage over a people.    
 

So lets talk a little bit about a Republic vs. a Democracy.  In a democracy, what is the first thing they teach you as kids?  They teach us the pledge of allegiance.
 

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God,  Indivisible, with liberty, and justice for all.”
  

In the pledge of allegiance, we do not pledge our allegiance to a democracy.  A Republic is the proper description of our government, not a “democracy.”  I invite you to raise awareness about that distinction.
 

 The distinction between our Republic and a democracy is not an idle one.  It has great legal significance.
 

And just what is the significance between a pure democracy and a republic?  In a democracy all it takes is 51% to beat a 49%.  So we get into these big debates about things and go all into it and discuss things and topics and 51% wants things to be one way and 49% wants it to be another way, and because we live in a democracy the 51% wins and the other 49% have to yield to the 51%.  Well, what happens then is that 49% of people have no rights.  What the majority wants the majority gets and that is what everybody wants and is currently okay with, so that’s how we proceed, with absolutely no rights.  The last thing the people want is democracy because this is what democracy looks like.  If all we have is a democracy, all you will see is a loss of rights all across America, and beyond.  Because whatever the majority wants they put on their initiative and they vote on it, and when it gets put in, you’re subject to it, without exceptions.
 

So what is a citizen?  What is the definition of a citizen?  A citizen is a legally recognized subject or national of a state or commonwealth, either native or naturalized.  When you are subject to the government, it makes you a controlled person and you can’t bucket.    
 

So if I walked up to a person in uniform and said, you’re violating peoples rights and accepting FIAT currency which is fake to do so, how do you think that police man or woman would respond?  They’d probably say, yeah… so what’s it to you, and what is your name sir, and can I see your I.D. and be asking for back-up to take you to the nearest FEMA regional camp and tell you snoopy is going to be there to get you excited to go to camp snoopy.    
 

I other words however, who am I to lour all my personal preferences over you or over this police officer by telling them that it’s illegal to accept FIAT currency to flatten out a good portion of the nations ability to thrive.  I’m sure that police man wouldn’t like it, however the peace officer would totally dig it, because peace officers are more friendly then your hell bent admiralty law sucker for all their hate and bull shit they do to people, but either way, who are we to decide for them what they should think about the way they conduct their affairs with people?  Although if you’re not doing any harm, except wearing a legal authority to ruin peoples lives, you might not think of it as so bad or anything, but it is.  It’s a serious problem we are having with these people.  But, if you’re accepting FIAT currency and you want to be bought into being its slave, and you’re conducting yourself in a manner that doesn’t afflict with peoples livelihoods or their jobs and you aren’t hurting anyone, then I have no jurisdiction over you… you’re doing the best you can.    
 

In a democracy however if you are subject to the jurisdiction, you have to do whatever you are told you have to do.  And what is the method we use to tell a person what they have to do, well they call them statutes, and in a democracy their statutes are everything.  In a democracy, you are instructed on what you can do and what you can’t do, so on and so forth.  And we have a name for that.  Whenever you have privilege taken away or re-granted or reinstated, all of that is done through their statutes.  And I want you to catch the phrase granted to you, when something is granted to you, whom is it granted by?  The government.
 

So if you play by the rules of the government and subject yourself to all its decrees and things then you have to play by the rules of that government weather or not it kills you, or sabotages your career or livelihoods, you are subject to the jurisdiction that is provided for you in statutory law which is admiralty law, so on and so forth.  So in this democracy, you have no choice other then to go along with the commands of the majority.    
 

Now, it’s real important to bureaucrats to have control and to place this jurisdiction over you, but it is also real important too that they keep you ignorant of the fact that you are being controlled.  So, they have to somehow make you believe that you are within their jurisdiction because they know that they don’t have any jurisdiction over you, and especially not in the manner they wish to proceed with your ability to thrive in this country, HELL NO.  They don’t want you to get away with knowing a damn thing about your rights, so they trick people.  So, the easiest way to trick people is to take advantage of their own ignorance.  And how do they do that?  Well, you do to school and the first thing they teach you is the pledge of allegiance.  They teach you that you are a citizen and that you’ve got to be a good little citizen if you want to advance in life, and that you’ll have certain duties and so forth.  And then they teach you the benefits of being a citizen and you’ll learn all these things throughout your schooling years all the way up through high school.  And if they were to tell you that these are privileges that can be granted or taken away from you at the discretion of the government, I suspect that if everyone really knew that today, that we’d have a revolution within 24 hours.  So, they don’t tell you that because governments are allergic to revolutions, they don’t like that kind of thing.  So what do they do?  They give all these privileges a special name and you’ve herd it thousands of times, civil rights.  That’s what these privileges should be called are civil rights.  They should be called civil privileges, because that is what they are but they want to trick you into believing that it gives you some sore of benefit while making sure you are sustained by its decrees and will give up that right when asked.  And civil rights are the last thing you truly want because civil rights are civil and are then a civil matter and you were born with natural rights.  So, you want the rights that you were born with, not the rights that are gifted to you.  So what you are looking for are Natural Rights.  You might accept their civil rights if it somehow works out to your advantage but I assure you that you don’t want civil rights, you want natural rights.  Rights that are endowed to us by a creator, or a natural state of being a human being on this planet and should be preserved in being able to obtain the unreachable destinations in life that set you apart from the herd and make millions in the process, but they don’t want any of that, because that would mean for that much more empowered individuals and empowered individuals means that these people have a lot more real people to fight.  They don’t need a lot of real people to fight because they just want you all dumbied up and bought into their decrees and never studying a damn thing that could set you or anyone else free from the chains that bind us.  Most of all have to deal with peoples abilities to thrive, some have to deal with debilitating issues that are being taken advantage of… but whatever reason that it be… the disenfranchisement starts from the minute you are born, and the second you go to school – you enter this quasi-moronic environment of people that all want to help you be a good little slave, and people who will try to make this slavery all feel like home.
 

They teach you that you are a citizen of the United States of America, so what happens if you’re not a citizen of the United States?  Well, that must mean that you are one of the people of the United States.  And if you’re not a citizen, what else could you be?  You might be a people!  You see, because people own the government and the government owns the citizens that slave after the government.   That is what is known as, the pecking order.  A people are defined in the preamble, a citizen is defined in the 14th amendment.    
 

What is the legal definition of a democracy?  A democracy is the form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy.  (Blacks Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition pp. 388-398)
 

No government organization has sovereignty, all the sovereignty lies primarily in the people.  But, which people?  It’s the whole body of people.  Individually there is no sovereignty in a democracy, because it contradicts the individual sovereignty.  In a democracy we vote on things and if we pass those things we vote for, everyone has to follow its decrees and if it doesn’t, it’s not a real democracy because not everyone is interested in living the ways that some government is going to tell them they ought to live.  So, a whole continent wide could overthrow their government simply by saying, well they aren’t going to take care of this problem over here so, we’re just going to start to do it ourselves.    
 

So what is a Government that is a Republican Government?  One in which that powers of the sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through chosen representatives by the people, to whom the powers are specially designed or delegated.  (Blacks Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition p 626)
 

The word people can be either plural or singular in context.  The word “people,” is not the plural word of the word person.  You have one person, or many persons.  That is the proper usage of those two words, legally when we are speaking legal English.  The word “people,” is a singular; meaning, you are a people, I am a people and they are a people.  Of course you never hear it spoke that way, the fact is; is that you are a people.  Or, all of you together are people.  So, it’s one of us or more.  And, each of us is sovereign.  And we know this by the preamble.  When we created this entity called government, we created it, and we gave up nothing, but we still have our sovereignty.  You see, you can’t tell me that I don’t have my sovereignty, because it’s all about what you learn and how much you’re willing to be knowledgeable about facts and truth.  And, if you tell me that my sovereignty belongs to some group of people, we go back to a democracy.  And if I have personal issues with sovereignty, and then someone comes along and says that I must do something, where is my sovereignty in that?  I’m now subject to somebody else’s dictates.  But, if someone comes along and says here’s a new rule and I suggest we all follow it, it’s advisory… well, that’s a whole different story.   
 

As individual sovereigns; we have no obligation to anyone else, other then to not injure someone else and to not to infringe upon the individual sovereignty of someone else.  So, if someone comes to me, or I go to them and say that here is a rule that has come up, you’re free in your sovereignty in what you choose in you capacity as to what you think in your own sovereignty as to what you should do, and if you don’t follow it, and it hurts someone or it infringes upon the sovereignty of another, well that’s your responsibility and you’re going to have to face the consequences that follow your behavior in your sovereign decisions.  Why did you injure that person?  Why didn’t you follow the rules?  And you know it’s a responsibility, but it only operates if you injure somebody, right?