You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Announcing the Delegation Committee
Good starting point and certainly an improvement from how it has been done previously.
Still think it is vital that while the committee should be flexible and efficient in how they appprove new projects for a delegation, the community should have a mechanism to opt the receivers of the largest delegations out should it fail to live up to the requirements stated in the first document of delivering sustainable value to the community at large.
They do. It has a quarterly review. Every recipient has to reapply every 4 months. AND, if a recipient sucks, for any reason, they can yank it. For no reason. And, recipients have to be willing to sign contracts, to handle their delegation as they have been asked to. Or rather, as they proposed to, and for which they received approval. If they deviate, the delegation gets yanked, theoretically.
This is where I think having extra sub committee members will come in handy.