A very elaborate post on vitaly here feel like i understand him already. Well i live in ukraine.

felt to give quick translation for my non korean friends
vitaly에 관한 매우 정교한 게시물은 내가 이미 그를 이해하고있는 것처럼 느껴진다. 나는 우크라이나에 산다.

한국 사람이 아닌 친구를 위해 빠른 번역을주는 느낌

Vitaly Vaterin says he does not participate in the EEA in Qingdao, China. I mentioned in the first part what it means to cooperate with the Central Bank of China and Russia to publish an Ether-based virtual currency. Did Vitalic Butterin get in the way? I think. This time I want to show that the EEA, which is now driving up the price of Etherium, will in fact violate the basic spirit of the block chain, eventually leading to the loss of etherium. To do this, we first tried the EEA to expand the area of ​​Vitalic Butterin Etherium, but the EEA has gone against the basic intent of the block chain and ultimately the EEA will undermine Etherium's foundations. Why Vitalic Buterin promoted the EEA Etherium is a strange step in the ideals of the block chain world. Vitaly Vitterin, director of Etherium, seems to have a greater emphasis on marketing than technology. The most representative is EEA. As the so-called Etherium Business Alliance implies, Vitalic Buterin seems to be doing its best to port companies to Etherium. His intentions are understandable. It is going to build up solid position in the block chain system of Jung-gu heating. If it is the most representative platform among the block-chain projects, it might be the intention that Bill Gates can control the block-chain system just as Windows has rated the computer world. It's as if Windows was better than the Windows, even though it was much better than Windows. If so, Vitalic Buterin misrepresented the number. The situation is different from then. Among the military proverbs, there is a saying, "past generals." If you fight in the way you used to fight in the past, it always means to lose. There is also a saying in the grandchild law that tradition is an insecurity. It means that you can not fight and win in war in the same way. In this respect, I believe that the strategy of Vitalic Buterin is very likely to be wrong. Let's see why. I think Ether's recent rise is thanks to Ether's marketing. It does not seem to be my own idea. From what I have said from the beginning, technology is basically the most important thing for IT companies. Marketing is next. Especially in the block chain, technology became a decisive factor. Even if the technology is not enough, it is not a situation that can be tolerated by marketing. In a block chain, technology is the first and the last. Recently, one of my friends, Stithmidd, has posted a posting pointing out the problems of the EEA. It was written by @tryword, but it did not get much attention. There is an absolute taboo in the world of investment. He is trying to see what he wants to see and not to see what he does not want to see. Oddly, it seems that the tendency in the world of etherium and steam is very strong. In order for your investment to be good, it is a priority to make sure that you do not go in the direction of what is going wrong. However, people try not to look strange at all, but only intentionally. Such phenomena are now happening. Https://steemit.com/kr/@tryword/6v3ugf Why does the EEA undermine the foundation of Etherium Eiderium's EEA thinks that those who reproduce their self contradictions are the most misguided policy directions. It is clear why you think so. The original block chain was a technique for eliminating inefficiencies due to the concentration of large corporations, countries and banks. I have talked about it with Vitaly Vaterin himself. "While most of the technology automates workers who perform only simple tasks on the edge, the block chain automates the center to extract power. Instead of losing the job of a taxi driver, the block chain takes away Uber's work and helps taxi drivers to deal with customers directly "(Block Chain Revolution, p. 48) Why would Vitaly Vaterin try to get in touch with the center? The EEA means that the block chain originally aimed at the periphery and the periphery walked into the centralized center of self-centering. This is the enemy of the enemy. Will Vitalyk become a Trojan horse and destroy large corporations, banks and nations? Or will it be rather a frontrunner of large corporations, banks, and nations, or centers? I think the latter is more likely. In any case, the EEA will not use public keys. They will use a private key. Vitalic Buterin 's hasty policy is likely to proceed in the direction of the future of Etherium, as well as the dark cloudiness of the future of the block chain. Vitalic Buterin was too premature. He should have put Etherium in the best condition first. And on that basis, we had to succeed at one of the ongoing Dapps. Based on Etherium, it is too far from the corporate alliance that any Dapp is not working properly and can take the etherium base. Will the corporate alliance and Dapp win or will they compete? In conclusion, Vitalic Buterin broke the basic spirit of the block chain in an attempt to raise its market share. Above all, he was patient. Patience is the best policy. Why did Dan Larimer make EOS an Ether? Is it ally of Ether and EOS? Or is it another war? I think I'm the latter. Dan Larimer seems to be a much more militant person than Vitalic Buterin.