Hello sir,

First of all take my sincere honor and respect, sir. 

I am presenting international English language translation by giving sincere respect to you.

Hopefully you are good at the grace of God. 

Thank you very much for presenting your 1st valuable blog post on Monday sir.

English version: 

In the evening, I went to the theater and watched the recent hot comedy movie "The First Richest Tomatoes". I originally planned to go to see it last Friday, and later I changed it tonight.
　　

The online response of this comedy movie was very good, and the box office was once soaring. It was close to or even surpassing the momentum of "I am not a drug god" in the previous period. Many people have said after reading that "Tomato Richest" is different from "I am not a drug god". It is pure entertainment and funny movies. The whole film has a lot of laughs, which can almost make you laugh from the beginning to the end.
　　

However, I think that "The First Richest Man" has some characterizations in some places. For example, Wang Duoyu (Shen Teng) is driving on the road and being touched by porcelain. I personally think that it can reflect some social reality. Xia Zhu (Song Yi Hua) happened to go to work, just to see Shen Teng with the person who touched the porcelain on the side of the road, intuition and superficial phenomenon made her think that the king was extraordinarily bullying, bullying passers-by, and took out the mobile phone for shooting, while shooting When speaking to passers-by, encourage passers-by not to be afraid, telling the truth, and the crowds who are not aware of the truth are now surrounded by "infuriating indignation", and there is a look of "the road is not flat." All this makes it worthy of being a victim. The king who is the victim is the extra one. "The scholars meet the soldiers, they can't tell the truth." They have no choice but to help.
　　

In the final episode of the film, Xia Zhu once again saw that the passerby who had been "crashed" once again re-enacted the porcelain on the road, and suddenly realized that Wang Duyu had been shackled before. As for Xiazhu, I didn’t secretly regret my previous recklessness and impulsive misunderstanding of Wang Duyu. I didn’t know this, and I didn’t say much in the movie.
　　

Of course, we all know that when a person sees the same person twice to "touch porcelain", except for the traffic police, the probability is very low, and it is almost impossible. After all, the movie is a movie, or the sentence, art comes from life, or is it higher than life.
　　

However, this seemingly absurd misunderstanding is gone in real life? Obviously there is. We are in the modern network information society. Every day, we are surrounded by thousands of news information. No matter how much we turn on computers, mobile phones, tablets, etc., we will see a lot of life and social information, and most of the information is also Provide a place to comment and exchange. I often see on the Internet that many people will judge the "right" of a certain news. However, in many cases, the sights are not necessarily true, or the news you see is not necessarily the true side of the facts. Or, you only see a part of the truth, just as we said in the article "Blind Man" that we learned when we were young, what you see (feeling) is not necessarily the true side of things (facts), at best, at best. It’s just a corner. However, many people still don’t understand this truth. They criticize or arbitrarily evaluate others. They think they are “objectively correct” or “see the truth.” As everyone knows, it’s like the bamboo in the "The First Richest Man" movie. I thought that I saw the truth of the facts and wanted to do justice for this. I don’t know why I didn’t, but I was used by others.  

Dear visitor friend, please visit the link and see the image: https://bit.ly/2LXl0Iz

The picture source from baike.baidu.com 

Sir, accept my sincere honor and love.

I pray that you and your family should stay healthy.

Good night sir.

your most obedient,

         olvio