Man Made Climate Change Proven A Hoax?
In a recent major scientific study, a prominent scientist has published a peer-reviewed paper to one of humanities largest science journals which expresses that NASA & NOAA have indeed artificially altered data to suit a political narrative and can now be proven as unscientific and a manipulation.
Whilst controversial it is some of the basis as to why president Donald Trump has pulled out of the Paris climate change agreement and has rattled libertarians who believe that we are destroying our planet.
Lord Monkton is a strong advocate to this new major study and now suggests that this is the nail in the coffin for man made climate change and can no longer lay claim that it is supported by science.
Please see article for more information and would love to hear peoples comments how they feel about this strong conviction and if we have been cheated by an agenda to tax and profit further from the public whilst creating a whole new industry driven by fake manipulated science.
If you actually read the paper, the study calls into question the historical data being used from 1880 and 1970 before we had much better technology to measure global atmospheric and surface water temperatures. The study does NOT question how the data post-1970 was treated.
The conclusion of the study was also a lot less sensational than the theblaze.com writeup. They said, basically, yeah the data shows some short term warming from the 70s but we're not really sure if the data before then is really that reliable, which is a fair point but not the smoking gun you need to invalidate an entire corpus of climate change research.
Please research a little deeper before you start tossing out politically-tainted red meat.
Edit: Also a good number of the authors of the paper used to work for various fossil-fuel companies. That's not grounds to disbelieve them but grounds enough to be skeptical.