Sort:  

I read the article. I'm not terribly surprised with his analysis nor with his idea's on how to go about solving the issues. My first impressions is that he wants are to essentially scare you with the stats. Almost like a justification for what he is about to propose.

I'm sure it will compel plenty of people because no one wants, to have a poor income, no resources, no parks and trees, no assurance of food, no water, etc.

I think where he really tries to put the cherry on the cake is with global temperatures. That dictates a lot of potential issues with natural disasters and property and it's the one thing that can gain them a LOT of power over people.

His section on "What to do?" Interesting. Have fewer children and reduce your carbon footprint. It's interesting for ominous reasons.

Reminds me of this "Georgia Guidestones" and it reminds me of the Eugenics program started by the academic world.

It reads:

"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."


Link

I know what their end goal is, sadly. But we need to have more natural disasters like we had this year in Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Mexico and all over the world. The pain needs to be bad enough that we'll be willing to give up more of our rights.

My future post, might be #4, will talk about this agenda to influence nations by using the weather as an excuse. And it has multiple benefits, according to them. This also ties into your other post about Egypt. The similarities you've noticed between pagans and Gods people. There's a counterfeit that is the crowning act...and they need the morality to decrease, to help families, and heal "mother earth." These folks also see the earth as a deity.

And all of this..."for the common good."

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 58068.07
ETH 3133.85
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44