Simplifying The Complex

in #christianity7 years ago

One question that tends to cross the minds of many people involves the reason why there are so many different denominations of Christianity. It all revolves around two things: the relationship between the individual with the principle of sin, and the relationship between the individual with God. At the heart of these two things is the relationship between the humanity and the divinity of Jesus with His Father in heaven.

When Jesus walked among his disciples, they were not clear about these things. This is why their focus was on who would hold the most power in the kingdom of God. Even after Jesus was resurrected, it was asked of him if he would now restore the kingdom to Israel. It wasn’t until the day of Pentecost (which was 50 days after Passover, and was a commemoration of the giving of the Ten Commandments) that the eyes of their understanding were opened, and they saw the truth of the matter.

It was this ability to see that empowered them to love God, and one another, in fulfillment of the law. And, it was their love for one another that empowered them to “turn the world upside down.” It’s interesting that Jesus was never accused of this. Paul makes note of this love for the brethren that existed in the Church at Ephesus.

But as time went on, a change came. Something happened to cause the Church to lose its first love, and the Church at Ephesus was particularly called out in the book of Revelation over it. That something had to do with people acknowledging others as being more superior than themselves. This made a place for the establishment of a clerical hierarchy within the Christian religion. The Bible calls those who advocated this false sense of humility, Nicolaitans.

As people lost love, they consequently lost the understanding of the relationships between themselves, sin, Jesus, and the Father. This made a way for alternative explanations of these subjects, which led to the formation of factions within the body of believers throughout the Roman Empire. In the beginning of the fourth century, the Roman Emperor Constantine associated himself with Christianity, and used his state authority to call together an ecumenical conference in the year 325. Out of that came a creed that defined what it meant to be a Christian, and those who opposed it were deemed enemies of the state. This was the beginning of what is now known as the Roman Catholic church.

Another thing Constantine did during his reign was to move the capital of the Roman Empire to a city in Turkey that he named after himself, Constantinople (now Istanbul). In the proceeding centuries, another Christian religious hierarchy would develop in the Eastern Roman Empire, also known as the Byzantine Empire. By the eleventh century, the Vatican recognized this other hierarchy as something that needed to be addressed, so the pope sent dignitaries with a letter essentially saying that there wasn’t enough room on this planet for two separate structures, and that they needed to acknowledge the pope as the true head of the organization. The eastern organization responded with something akin to telling the pope to take a long walk off a short plank. This marked an event in the year 1054 that is known as The Great Schism. This produced what is now known as the Eastern, Russian, and Greek Orthodox churches. By the end of the century, the Vatican had attempted to rectify this separation by sending an army to Jerusalem (which was in Byzantine territory), and liberate it from the Muslims in a public relations disaster that is now known as the Crusades, but that is another subject.

Throughout the Middle Ages, there were those who attempted to introduce reforms to return the Roman Catholic church back to the divine model that Jesus gave, or assembled as a separate body. Most of those people were denounced as insane if not executed for heresy, as were my ancestors. It wasn’t until the 16th century that a reform lead out by Martin Luther was able to succeed as a result of the German princes unwillingness to prosecute Martin. This is where the term Protestant came from.

From there, other western European countries became Protestant which produced separate denominations such as the Anglican church of England, and the Presbyterian church of Scotland. Around this same time, the Bible started to become mass produced, and the United States was founded. These things, coupled with the freedom of conscience, gave birth to a multitude of different congregations and denominations based on different people’s conclusions from reading the Bible.

Regardless of how many different bodies of professed believers there are, Jesus broke it down to only two, as he knew all this was bound to happen, and spoke of it in a parable.

“The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.” Matthew 13:24-30.

When asked about the interpretation of this, he said,
”He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.” Matthew 13:37-43.

The preachers of this world may warn their flocks about this harvest coming to pass someday. My point in publishing this however, is to testify that someday has come.
Sort:  

So you are announcing the second coming?

Bold. Somehow I missed it. Are you claiming to be Jesus?

Well, what exactly do you mean, then?

Are you being abrupt with me because you're holding a grudge against me for questioning one of your previous posts?

Don't be like that. If you don't want people to comment, what's the point of posting? I'm just trying to dialog.

What do I mean about what?

You didn't question my previous post. You expressed your reasons for disagreeing with it. I stopped responding to you because I have no desire to attempt to persuade people against what they are settled on believing because that isn't dialogue, it's arguing.

How should I be like? You asked some questions, and I answered them. Do I owe you something else?

Well, specifically I was asking what you mean by announcing the second coming. Jesus is back? Please, I would like to hear more. I haven't seen or heard anything where I'm at, and based on my understanding of scripture I was thinking it would be a world-wide event. I'm assuming you have some deeper meaning I'm missing, so I was asking what it was.

I don't post anything in the comments section just to express my opinions on something. I only post in the interest of dialog. I enjoy it, and this is a social media platform. Your posts are interesting to me, so I try to engage.

I'm not settled on believing anything. Everything I believe is subject to re-evaluation and I really don't think there's any kind of faith worth having that can't stand up to scrutiny.

You don't owe me a thing. I was just trying to have a conversation for conversation's sake. You did answer, but they were rude answers, like you would give to someone you were hoping would stop bothering you. Okay, I will.

You're not bothering me. I just tend to not give any more information than I have to based on my experiences with people. Especially people that I don't even know. I can only assume that Garth Freeman is your real name.

The second appearing of Christ is a much bigger subject than people realize because of their understandings (or lack thereof) and conclusions surrounding the first appearing of Christ. I'm going to be addressing this in my next post, and probably others.

This post has been ranked within the top 50 most undervalued posts in the first half of Apr 22. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $1.69 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 22 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 62648.12
ETH 2562.87
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74