Thanks for your response. There are some very real challenges in making things happen and doing it equitably, aren't there?

I agree that too much of what's donated is misallocated, often for greedy purposes. The Clinton Foundation is famous for doing just that. But there are some that require their workers to raise their own support.

I'm curious how your perspective works out for folks who want to help and are both physically capable and have the skills to make an impact, but can't afford to do anything.

What if someone really wants to make a difference for people, and has the skills, but doesn't have the finances to do it? Should they pursue it and ask others to help? Would it be wrong for them to receive an income from the donations while doing so?