RE: Steemit Developer @sneak Hides Two Highly Revealing Posts Related To Verifiable Student Actors Involved in Florida School Shooting
I'd advise you to try not awaken the giant, but I think you already have. The Streisand effect had already taken hold, and even if you bury this comment. It's going to echo thunderously throughout the platform!
Yes, everyone is going to know you're a conspiracy theory whackjob, shaming children who just watched their friends get murdered. I can't wait until steemit has enough sane people with stake on it to flag all you tinfoil hat nonsense peddlers to zero forever.
It's absolutely disgusting to see some of the idiocy that earns on this platform. Thank fuck it's only because of a handful of early adopters who are the sole cause of it. Soon they'll be outnumbered by well-staked people who have two brain cells to rub together, and you and your chicken little ilk will stop earning and go back to whatever butthole of the internet you used to post your chemtrail and antivax and crisis actor and pizzagate rubbish before you came here.
You've checked all the boxes with that one. Demagoguery (name calling), Conflation of issues (lumping into categories), extreme vitriol and hatred to incite frustration, blatant use of children, desire to control ideas on platform through mass thinking.
Recognizing the Enemy of Truth: Cryptome’s Guide To Forum Spies – GCHQ and COINTELPRO Disruption Techniques
https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/05/05/recognizing-the-enemy-of-truth-cryptomes-guide-to-forum-spies-gchq-and-cointelpro-disruption-techniques/
@sneak you said that I was: "shaming children who just watched their friends get murdered"
PROVE YOUR CLAIM!
Your gas-lighting attempts mean nothing on this platform! Is it standard practice for Steemit developers to engage in slanderous accusations?
I love Steemit! I particularly love that wallets are publicly auditable, because it shows associations that would otherwise be hidden, such as between you, @blacklist-a, and @bloom.
It reveals a desperate attempt to conceal information that challenges the status quo, and that you are conspirators losing that fight.
You seem to be wholly dependent on the idea that your little stake is all it takes to change the perception of reality to what supports your particular derangement. This is further revealed by your failure to provide any debate other than flags and ad hominems. @bloom is worse. He doesn't even dare ad hominems, because that would open him up to flags, and demonstrate just how little support he actually has in the community.
It's why he has to be funded off chain. The only reason you have any cause to feel justified in your statements is your stake.
That is ephemeral, illusory, and worse for you, temporary. I really can't think of any less substantial support for ideas than the person promoting them has a stake.
You really should join @bloom in completely hiding your vitriol behind flags alone, rather than revealing the insubstantial nature of your views with posting actual words, if you want to be most effective in your attempts to censor.
It leaves a smaller window for folks to examine what you're trying to achieve.
Actually, you should either put up or shut up about the facts you're trying to twist, and since you've demonstrated you have no reason behind your flags, utterly failing to point out a single fact other than your complete subservience to propaganda, it's obvious that flags are all you have; your stake is all you can rely on to preserve your deranged world.
I don't envy you the cognitive dissonance that's going to hit you, someday.
It'll be a good thing in retrospect, after you've absorbed the reality it reveals, but it'll be difficult to ride out, given the depth of your hostility to facts and debate.
Good luck with that.