Self-Censorship: Where The Real Damage Is Being Done

I was going to write another article today about a different topic, but I backed down because I didn't think I could deliver the kind of fiery, forceful, unmitigated argument it would need to be without risking getting banned from social media and blogging platforms.

The article I was planning on writing, which you'll just have to imagine now, would have been titled " 'Assange Can Leave Whenever He Wants!' No, Idiot, He Can't." The feature image was going to be a screen shot of a blue-checkmarked empire loyalist named Greg Olear tweeting the infuriatingly dopey argument that Assange is free to just waltz out the embassy doors whenever he wants, so therefore he isn't actually being imprisoned by an Orwellian power establishment for publishing authentic documents about powerful people. Never mind the fact that you can say exactly the same thing about literally anyone under political asylum; they are all free to leave the political asylum they've been granted at any time, and pointing this out is just describing the thing that political asylum is. Never mind the fact that a UN panel ruled that Assange is being arbitrarily detained by the threat of imprisonment. Never mind that the same US government which tortured Chelsea Manning is currently openly pursuing Assange's arrest because of his publications, making the assertion that he's "free to leave" the same as saying he's "free" to jump off a cliff. People don't want to believe that their government imprisons journalists, so whenever Assange is in the news you see this argument making the rounds.

It would have been a firecracker of an article, but when it came time to write it, I backed down. I'd generally rather scrap an article than write something tepid and boring that won't make any impact, so the risk of losing access to my platforms outweighed my desire to write what I'd planned on writing.

I've been self-censoring more and more lately, especially since the latest round of coordinated cross-platform silencing of multiple alternative media outlets the other day. Back in August I had my Twitter account temporarily deleted when I said the world will be better off without John McCain and a bunch of #Resistance accounts mass reported me; Twitter cited "abusive behavior" as its justification. The only reason my account was restored was because there was a large objection from many high-profile journalists and activists who understand the dangers of internet censorship, and I'm not willing to gamble that I'd get that lucky should something similar happen again. Being able to disrupt establishment narratives on a high-traffic website like Twitter outweighs the benefits of speaking in an unmitigated way.

And that ultimately is precisely the point. If the social engineers can make an example of a few dissident voices in the public eye, everyone else will rein in their own speech and behavior to avoid the same fate. The overall effect of this phenomenon is actually far more effective in suppressing dissident speech than the overt censorship is by itself, because self-censorship actually silences exponentially more anti-establishment opinions. For every one voice you crack down on overtly, a thousand more silence themselves out of self-preservation, not saying things they would otherwise say and not doing things they would otherwise do.

Meanwhile empire loyalists know that they can consistently get away with saying anything they want with total impunity. The other day for example I criticized the fawning media accolades that professional Atlantic Council propagandist Eliot Higgins has been receiving lately, and he responded by calling me "Grotbags", an obese witch character from a nineties children's television show. The joke being, you see, that I am overweight, and I am also a woman, so I am therefore similar to the character Grotbags. Ha ha ha. Eliot has been repeating this hilarious joke for months with zero consequences. He also made headlines back in June with his repeated public invitation for people who disagree with him on Twitter to suck his balls, also with zero consequences.

After my August Twitter suspension a #Resistance account publicly doxxed me, posting my home address, phone number and other information. I didn't make a public ordeal out of it at the time because I obviously didn't want to draw attention to it, but I did report it because I wanted it deleted. I was not expecting Twitter Support to reject my report, especially after they had me jump through a bunch of hoops to prove that I did in fact live where the doxxer was saying I lived, but they did.

"We understand that you might come across content on Twitter that you dislike or find offensive," Twitter wrote back. "However, after investigating the reported content we found it was not in violation of Twitter's private information policy. As a result, it won't be removed at this time."

I see this routinely across all platforms; some accounts act without any fear of consequences, others seem primed for hair-trigger suspension. The bias is distinctly slanted in the favor of those who support CIA/CNN narratives and attack anyone who speaks out of alignment with the agendas of the US-centralized empire.

So while we are mitigating our speech more and more, the Eliot Higginses of the new media environment consistently get away with all manner of abusive behavior without any repercussions. We're fighting a media war in which we are not just outnumbered and outgunned, but are increasingly forced to fight with one arm tied behind our backs. The only thing we have going for us at this point is that authenticity is attractive and oligarchic funding can't buy creativity or inspiration.

So anyway, there's my confession that I have been caving to self-censorship to avoid being de-platformed. Rather than denying it, I think it's best that we all admit to it when we do it and call it what it is, because it's an unseen part of the people's media rebellion that is generally overlooked and under-appreciated. I haven't really figured out what to do about it beyond that, but in my experience drawing the light of attention to these things is always a good idea.


Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal,buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Sort:  

so the risk of losing access to my platforms outweighed my desire to write what I'd planned on writing.

So 'they', won...

Your fear of retribution because of the expressing of your opinion, was higher than your desire to express your thoughts..

ISN'T THAT LOSING YOUR PLATFORM, ANYWAY?

Exactly my thoughts reading this.

I've been doing the same thing. I don't want to have to establish new social media accounts, so I have been keeping my comments very very tame. That being said, I wonder what the growing under-the surface backlash will look like when the brakes come off... because believe me, I think it's inevitable that there will be a backlash growing stronger and stronger due to this censorship. It just hasn't been seen or felt yet because the platforms where it would ordinarily be said are filled with people like us, who are all walking on eggshells. But it's coming. I can tell by visiting other places like GAB and YOUTUBE and some alt-right message boards... the backlash is growing.

Can't say I haven't done the same.

Caitlin, I want to refer to you as the Great and Powerful Oz. You are invaluable as a writer. At the same time I feel like Dorothy or The Tin man begging for you to listen and help. Not once have you acknowledged my replies.

I don’t believe I have been too offensive. I have not meant to be.

Why do I reply to you? It is like one of those movies where the hero archaeologist is in the secret cave and has found the sacred tomb or whatever. Now all he needs is that one sacred jewel to place in the right place and wonderful, magical things will happen.

I have that jewel.

More than ten years ago I had an epiphany that solved everything. The real issue in the world was the unhindered supremacy of individual intelligence. I have never looked back.

The solution is a Collective Intelligence

You are so right when you dream of a better.world. You are just missing that one part. That one perspective.

It will change everything.

We will kick some serious ass. Or we can continue to document the abuse and cry foul

We need to realize that new world, I need you to listen.

So, you're human. Like us all. Still, I hope you will write that post. Getting black listed is better than losing your self respect. Also, when they come down on you, they expose themselves. Karma has a long memory. You might find a better way to get the truth out. Who knows? But, I think, it is best to keep faith with the "better angels;" it keeps the light shining from your eyes, a light more influential than words.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.20
JST 0.037
BTC 94320.05
ETH 3419.91
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.88