RE: Daily Celestial Challenge : (Monday) - Darkness
Dark energy/matter are nothing more than a mathematical construct due to a failed paradigm and therefore is nonsense.
If time is an arrow can you point me in the direction it is pointing? Time is not an arrow, nor is it a dimension, it is that which allows for change to occur.
CMB has been shown by several papers to have many faults that raise questions concerning its claims. Including the fact that Kirchoff's Law on thermal emissions has also been shown to be erroneous and being so it takes down Planck's constant 'h' and Boltzmann's constant 'k'.
The standard model is based on an erroneous paradigm, that being gravity a weak force is the prime force of the universe while the electric field is a thousand billion billion billion times stronger than gravity. Gravity is not even a foundational force or field and is likely an epiphenomenon of electricity.
I hope the fact that we have a difference of opinion on these matters does not interfere with us conversing about it. It is ok to disagree but to do so in a respectful manner.
Peace
#daemon-nice
It is common that, when reading about the universe or about particle physics, one will come across a phrase that somehow refers to “matter and energy”, as though they are opposites, or partners, or two sides of a coin, or the two classes out of which everything is made. This comes up in many contexts. Sometimes one sees poetic language describing the Big Bang as the creation of all the “matter and energy” in the universe. One reads of “matter and anti-matter annihilating into `pure’ energy.” And of course two of the great mysteries of astronomy are “dark matter” and “dark energy”.
And thanks for putting out such a thoughtful comment as i feel like it might encouraged you and that for me is an achievement.