Why We Need to Pay Attention to Usury

in #catholic6 years ago


I chanced across a blog post on usury a couple weeks ago that is the best explanation I've ever read of it. It turns out, usury-a major sin for Catholics-is almost completely misunderstood by most people in the modern world.

If you have a bit of time, the original article is hard to beat. I'll do my best to sum it up in under 1500 words.

Why Does Usury Matter?

This is a good place to start. It matters because something that has been denounced for centuries is worth investigating, even if one is not a follower of a particular group or faith. Ideas come and go, but those that are useful to a functioning society tend to stick around longer. Those who are interested in the rising inequality between the rich and the poor should also look into how usury may affect this. Finally, if usury is morally and materially detrimental to its victims, it is important to learn how to avoid being the victim of it.

What Usury Is Not

Let's start here. I've seen usury defined incorrectly as "charging a high rate of interest" on loans. This is not usury, although it is often an unjust action. A used car salesman who sells a vehicle at a 40% interest rate is not being usurious, although such an act generally is greedy and deceptive. (There is a way that used car dealers can be usurious, but we'll look at that later) These sorts of loans are often called "non-recourse".

Defining Usury in Simple Terms

Usury is charging interest on lending that which is consumed in its use. Let's break that down a little.

If I borrow money from a credit card company, I consume that money when I use it: I can't pay for something and still have my money. On the other hand, if I take a loan out against a house, the house is not consumed in its use, and it is not usury for a bank or lender to charge interest.

A better way to say it is this: if a person fails to repay a loan, and the result is that the lender can seek repayment from the person himself, it is usurious. This is opposed to a home mortgage, for instance, where a bank would typically reclaim the home (which has not been consumed by the borrower).

The small (but important) difference is here: in the usurious case, a person is being loaned money itself. In the case of a non usurious loan, the person is co-owning an asset with another party, and paying a rent for the continued use of the asset. In the case of a conventional home loan, for instance, the home buyer begins with a 20% down payment, making them co-owners with the bank of their home (this is not how home ownership is explained by real estate agents!). The bank charges interest, which essentially is the price the buyers pay to be able to live in that house while they pay it off fully.

Both the home buyers and the bank have a mutual end goal: the sustaining of a capital asset. When collateral is involved, and recovery of the collateral will close the contract, the loan is probably not usurious.

But when a credit card company loans money to an individual, that money is consumed (generally towards consumer "goods"). These loans have no specific collateral, and debt collectors can go after a person's future work...essentially putting them into debt slavery. This is one reason why lenders are so prevalent among military communities: they know they can seek action against borrowers who don't repay and that the government will dock their pay until they are repaid in full (various laws have been written in recent years to combat this).

The Effects of Usury

This is most easily seen in an area where usury has touched a great deal of the population: student loans.

Yes, student loans are usurious. The insane rise in the cost of college is a direct result of decades of usurious loans, which have created money out of thin air (no collateral). Student loans cannot be dismissed in bankruptcy, and the lender can't just take the collateral and close the contract. To be clear, from my understanding, they are only usurious if there is interest charged onto the payment, but even a small interest rate (1%) is usurious in this case.

Conclusion

Usury is the charging of interest on loans that are full recourse, where collateral does not exist that can be taken by the borrower to close the loan. It has serious effects on the economy and increases the gap between the rich and the poor, and it is understood by very few people. I may write more on this later this week, but in the meantime, curious readers should read St Thomas Aquinas' careful treatment of usury from the Summa Theologiae, and also check out the original link I mentioned from Zippy Catholic, which has a lot of FAQ's about this.

P.S. Platforms like Maker, Salt, and Lendroid offer non-recourse loans against your cryptocurrency. Another reason to be excited about the blockchain: it offers non usurious loan options!

-Jeff


Posted from my blog with SteemPress : http://steemmaker.com/usury/

Sort:  

I'm not convinced that someone having an unsecured credit card is sinful for the credit card company. I don't see that as biblical.

Deuteronomy 23:19 has been traditionally taught by Christians as prohibition against lending money at interest against persons:

"Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. 20 You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess."

Since the New Testament makes all of us brothers in Christ, one cannot charge usury at all, as there is no "foreigner" anymore.

De facto, we are all brothers, in holy scripture it is written, do not give money to your brother's growth. If you give money, it's a sin. But, if you are trusted with funds, then, when the time comes, you need to multiply these means, and not bury them in the ground, or to eat. Otherwise, it's also a sin.

I've never even heard the word usury let alone known it's meaning. I find this topic very interesting even though I have no religious foundation. Clearly, usury is one of many tools used to shackle the population with invisible chains.

SALT coin would not qualify as usurious. The loans given are backed by crypto holdings.

https://www.saltlending.com/

I wonder, how will they stop people from taking out a loan to buy more crypto... and then using that crypto to take out another loan to buy more crypto... and so on... lol

Yes, SALT is also a great platform!

To answer your question, you can only withdraw less than the amount you put up for collateral. With Maker, if you deposit $10k of ETH, you can withdraw until you get to 150% collateralization. Under 150%, your collateral is sold and you take a haircut on your holdings.
So in the above case, you're going to only want to withdraw about $5k in DAI. That puts you at 200% collateralization, which is still a bit risky, as ETH is still pretty volatile.

And yes, usury leads to slavery...which I think is why it has had such a long lasting prohibition (at least 3k years).

The problem with this country is that people think you need a degree to get a job. My niece has a degree and $55k in student loans, she's a waitress. When I was growing up, I got an associates degree at a community college. Why do people think they need to go to a university for 4 years? I'd rather start my young life not $55k in the hole. Great post Jeff.

Thanks, it is a serious problem and I hope we see some solutions in our lifetime. $55k is a real burden; she would never have been lent that if usury was illegal.

I think another aspect of usury is that it can involve deceit and/or deliberately leading people astray via the temptation of instant gratification. Or in the student loan example, that involves a measure of tempting people to gamble on getting a good job with the degree so they can pay the loan off, in addition to the deceit of promulgating the idea that they need a degree.

In other words, I can also see the Bible banning usury because of the snowball effect of other sins becoming involved.

That's the feeling I got, too. In the long term, usury seems to always lead to slavery for the borrowers.

It makes me appreciate the bankruptcy protection laws we have more than I used to...

I hadn't really looked into what constituted usury. That clears it up a lot for me and it makes sense why that commend would be in place. The goal was to not put your brothers into slavery to you. If there's no asset to be recovered, there's not chance to cancel the debt, and they'll be working for years (or forever) to pay off the loan.

On the flip side, even if usury is permitted by law in the USA, people might do well to heed the warning. There must be a reason that it was to be avoided. (I explained that above as you did in the article.)

Great post i never thought about it before

Maybe usury is worth noting, he needs attention :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 61940.19
ETH 2433.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50