You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Capitalism Isn't Corporatism

in #capitalism8 years ago (edited)

“Corporatism” is best understood as an alliance of business, labor and government, with government as the senior partner. Ed Klein wrote in one of his books how Obama is very enanamored of the idea.

Corporatism, in the sense I defined it, is anathema to a system of free minds and free markets. The people are not served by the government, but merely have their role to fill in a managed system. Corporatism is the basic structure of most Kleptocracies.

Blaming Corporatism or any other bad thing on private sector organizations (like corporations) is wrong, I think. Political power is the coin of the realm, and private actors are all supplicants to the politically powerful, to the extent that power extends to such individuals’ livelihood. The game today is to buy off the politically powerful, in order to be left alone. All big economic actors, including oil companies, have to do it. Of course, it gives them access to plead for their special interest, which is a good side business for the pol’s, e.g. the Clinton Foundation.

Sort:  

@redq

Regardless of "good" or "bad" people merely need to understand the distinction. Only then the puzzle can unravel in social consiousness and things really start taking a different turn.

David Mamet wrote in his book The Secret Knowledge: “between Good and Evil there is no choice, and thus moral choice means a choice between two evils.” There is no moral choice between free markets and 'corporatism'. Corporatism is clearly bad.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 63788.86
ETH 2476.31
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.66