Claiming capital

Hello Esteem Dear Friends, in the post dew today I want to mention capital as a means of boosting the economy of a country but also used as a strangulation mechanism of the employee.

SOURCE

The accumulation of capital derives from the profit that in turn derives from the surplus value and this is not created by the capitalist but by the salaried because it lacks sense that a worker without the possession of means of production can have free of charge the labor structure-private property of the capitalist or the landowner.

Let's say that the surplus value is the worker's interest to the employer for having allowed him to use his means of production with which that worker produces sufficient compensatory value of the salary received.

Indeed, when the owner of the means of production makes them available to the worker, it can not be a free collaboration of the worker towards the latter.

So to say that the worker is exploited by the employers because it leaves them surplus value would not go beyond being a truism or a subjective appreciation.

Thus, it is not surprising that the capitalist can wield that thanks to their efforts could be made of the money with which to acquire means of production in the market or usufruct those of their land that, save for the original property, every capitalist for centuries it has because it has been "winning" even if only indirectly.

Of course, that does not detract rationality or legality from such an accumulation. Established private property on the means of production, to enter capitalist or merchant is contemplated in the Constitution from the very times of the French Revolution: freedom of trade, equal commercial rights and social harmony between speculators and speculators.

That unscrupulous employers-who are the most-skimpay pay is one thing, and another that the employer in general is denied getting rich (accumulate capital) according to their managerial skills, their initiative, their stealthy control of the good use that should be given the worker to a factory or other property.

So, if private ownership of the means of production were to be ended, from the moment in which the rulers of the day or the high bureaucracy assume that property as collective or national, from that very moment, only one exploiter would have been replaced by other.
For the rest, that the workers self-coordinate in the collective management of the available means of production is and has been the tremendous challenge to which workers have been subjected in order to preserve the high and undeniable productivity that private capital has achieved. in these 300 or more years.

We will continue to develop this kind of demand for capital, for the employer, and for the weaknesses of the work of a proletariat that has received a bourgeois and contradictory culture between employers and workers, many of which hide their low productivity behind political reasons.
Since biblical or patriarchal times there have been private owners of the means of production, and save the worker of a glebe yesterday, or today a family worker in the condition of domestic staff, the employee has means of production that require administrative supervision given the characteristics of industrial and industrial work.

Of course, the exhaustive days, the employment of boys and girls, the discrimination of the wage earner against the wage earner and, above all, the maximization of the surplus value at the end of the reduction of the working time necessary for the recovery of the value of the salary, are all of them are anti-human practices that necessarily fall in the political area and it would be the government that would regulate those conditions, but not the issue of prices, nor the rate of profit, nor the type of market.

For example, the industrial work of footwear has never clashed with the craftsmanship of the shoemaker despite the fact that this primitive work prevents the growth of more values ​​of use as it does work seriously under the punctuation of the division of labor reduced to phases of work
The capitalist market is foreign to political affairs, but leaders interested in taking personal advantage of blackmail against employers, and through union populism, have oriented the teachings of Marxism-Leninism, not towards the greater productivity of capitalist industrial work, but towards a Alleged reduction of proletarian poverty.