You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Twitter stopped shadow banning people they disagree with.
No, both sides are not total shit. One side is correct, the other is extremely incorrect.
Both sides are the same shit in a different toilet. You said it yourself.
uh, no. Anti-fascism is objectively correct, fascism is objectively incorrect. If you mean democrats and republicans, they are both on the fascist side of the spectrum.
Anti fascism is fascism. You cannot be objectively intolerant of intolerance. Either you are tolerant or you are not tolerant. Its literally impossible to be intolerant of intolerance. LMAO
????
Yes you can. Protect people and shun the animals of society. It's why we have prisons to begin with lmfao.
One problem : antifa protects zero people. lol
If the nazis and antifa all got together in the same place and they all killed each other tomorrow. The world would be a better place instantly. Only problem is, the term Nazi is so loose now it literally just means anyone who isn't a neo liberal.
Which means antifa has the ultimate objective to kill pretty much everyone...
Also its literally impossible to be intolerant of intolerance. Unless you change the definition of the word it means you would not be able to tolerate yourself. Which makes zero sense.
Peak Centrism at play lmfao.
You should really talk to more leftists, you're literally entirely wrong and keep parroting far-right talking points and neo-liberal talking points while at the same time saying you disagree with them? Strange.
Antifa (myself, and dozens of other people I know who identify as such) have protected dozens of people personally from violence and other sorts. I know of hundreds of anti fascists that also volunteer at homeless shelters, give financial aid to police brutality victims, pay for medical costs to keep us alive when healthcare industries deny coverage, etc. You are wrong. You don't know what you're talking about. Expand your world view.
You frequently talk about how bubbles are bad, but you somehow have managed to position yourself in a situation where you don't understand any leftist philosophy even remotely and just do the same thing you preach against and just pretend they're crazy without evidence.
Anti fascism is by definition, against fascism. There is no equivocation with fascism as it is a polar opposite.
Neo liberals call people nazis to look "cool" so they can try not to upset us, but we know their game. They're on the shit-list, too. Hence the massive primary action that is shitting all over corporate dems over the last 6 months.
Please get out of the bubble and talk to more leftists or look at some more leftist philosophy lol, you're literally spewing a lot of the same garbage that I see people like Richard Spencer or Mike Cernovich say (two confirmed neo-nazis)
No the word is just not correct. Its actually genuinely impossible when using the definition of the word to be intolerant of intolerance.
Can we at least agree that the word is being used incorrectly. Because intolerant of intolerance means you have to be intolerant yourself which means you are not tolerant of your own beliefs.
Its literally impossible. Maybe change the word or something. Use different terminology or something. It doesn't work that way. Its illogical as hell. You cannot be intolerant of those who are intolerant. It does not work that way.
Well I am talking to one right now and you are not effective at getting me to agree with your side of the argument. When I see Nazis and antifa all I see are intolerant jackboot thugs who are butt hurt that the centrists wont side with them. That's all I see.
Also you just combined Cernovich with Spencer... They are not even remotely similar.
If you want to win the debate on this topic, you should ask cyberdemon WHO did they help.
None of the examples provided was stuff she did herself.
Trying to help and then failing isn't the same thing as actually helping someone, which can basically describe these ideologies in a nutshell.
As they say... The road to Hell is paved in good intentions.
I mean, I guess I could kill people but it's ok so long as I donate a few bucks to charity, right?
Intolerant people in this example are bigots; people that have the express purpose to make minorities sad and want to see them erased from the world.
Being intolerant of those people is the rule. If you can't decipher context well enough to figure that out, well... that's just a bit strange.
"jackboot thugs" lol, because a few people get heated and hurt people, that means everyone with a leftist ideology is a thug? .... thinking emoji.
Nazis and fascists' core philosophies end-goals are to eradicate minorities. Antifa's end goal is to create a peaceful and loving society. Just because a few leftists punched a nazi or two, does't mean that the goals of the entire movement are different. It just means you have a problem with registering sample sizes.
Cernovich is an alt-right white supremacist who pushes labels of pedophilia onto people and doxes journalists for fun and with the express intent to get them harmed. He is literally the same style of person. If you can find me some evidence that cernovich isn't alt-right, feel free to link it. I've seen dozens, if not hundreds, of articles and tweets of his own admission, and videos of him spewing this nonsense.